- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/14/26 at 9:45 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
it's pretty clear she's always had a strong desire for fame and attention
You mean like Ian Carroll and Candace?
Posted on 3/14/26 at 9:57 pm to the808bass
Candace is pissed because she loved Charlie and he chose Erika instead. Meanwhile she got stuck being the beard for a gay rich English guy and wants to destroy Erika due to being butthurt. How anyone takes that fake liberal bitch seriously, or any of these influencers, is beyond me
This post was edited on 3/14/26 at 9:58 pm
Posted on 3/14/26 at 10:14 pm to Jtomka
quote:
@ProjectConstitu
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 3/14/26 at 10:44 pm to WarBoudin
Jesus Christ you are trolling or a militant, effeminate, brainwashed some flavor of queer
Posted on 3/15/26 at 2:45 am to stout
Ian Carroll is a drug addicted schlep making bank from people whom want to believe, like agent Mulder.
Posted on 3/15/26 at 6:49 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
100000000000% everything the Left accuses the other side of doing is what they alone are guilty of doing.
What does the left have to do with this thread?
Posted on 3/15/26 at 7:26 am to SlowFlowPro
Ericka Kirk is 37 yrs old. Epstein was under investigation for his island shenanigans starting in 2005. When she was a teenager herself. And living in Arizona.
In what realm does she even have ties to Epstein to be associated with his antics? This is full on clickbait nonsense.
Posted on 3/15/26 at 7:38 am to SouthEasternKaiju
It's not as much clickbait as exposing a known conspiracy theorist for taking that too far
But my question remains. What does the left have to do with this thread? Ian Carroll is not associated with the left. Neither are Tucker or Candace.
But my question remains. What does the left have to do with this thread? Ian Carroll is not associated with the left. Neither are Tucker or Candace.
This post was edited on 3/15/26 at 7:39 am
Posted on 3/15/26 at 7:42 am to SlowFlowPro
Why do you ask questions to which you already SHOULD know the answers?
Jeffrey almost exclusively used his island and girls to placate and cater to a LEFTIST group. Erika? The face of undeniably Right. Interjecting her name so frivolously into this mess is nonsensical clickbait rubbish.
Jeffrey almost exclusively used his island and girls to placate and cater to a LEFTIST group. Erika? The face of undeniably Right. Interjecting her name so frivolously into this mess is nonsensical clickbait rubbish.
Posted on 3/15/26 at 7:53 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Why do you ask questions to which you already SHOULD know the answers?
It's a legit question because this forced insertion of "the left" is quite silly
quote:
Jeffrey almost exclusively used his island and girls to placate and cater to a LEFTIST group. Erika? The face of undeniably Right. Interjecting her name so frivolously into this mess is nonsensical clickbait rubbish.
And you just proved my statement above correct
Look, even within the forced-framing of your insertion of "LEFTIST" with Epstein, this still makes no sense within the thread. Why, you ask? Because to engage in that silliness, Epstein has to actually be involved. The problem for that with this thread is that Ian Carroll was promoting a lie and Epstein never was involved, so this forced association with the Left never existed in this story.
If Erika Kirk was never involved with Epstein, and those are all lies, then how can you logically argue this to explain what "the Left" has to do with this thread/discussion:
quote:
Jeffrey almost exclusively used his island and girls to placate and cater to a LEFTIST group.
The actual Epstein has no place in this discussion, because the inclusion of Epstein by Ian Caroll is a lie. It never happened. It's a fugazi.
So, we come back full circle. What does "the Left" have to do with this thread?
Posted on 3/15/26 at 7:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Ian Carroll claims there is audio of Erika Kirk scheduling girls for Epstein
"The problem for that with this thread is that Ian Carroll was promoting a lie and Epstein never was involved"
There are no words.
Posted on 3/15/26 at 8:03 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
The problem for that with this thread is that Ian Carroll was promoting a lie and Epstein never was involved"
There are no words.
I already covered this
quote:
Look, even within the forced-framing of your insertion of "LEFTIST" with Epstein, this still makes no sense within the thread. Why, you ask? Because to engage in that silliness, Epstein has to actually be involved. The problem for that with this thread is that Ian Carroll was promoting a lie and Epstein never was involved, so this forced association with the Left never existed in this story.
If Epstein wasn't actually involved, then any of his connections also weren't involved. Neither Epstein nor those connections are relevant to this discussion b/c his inclusion is a lie. That means your framing of including "LEFISTs" fails because that requires the very connections shown above to not be real or relevant to this discussion.
I can't make this more simple for you.
Posted on 3/15/26 at 8:09 am to SlowFlowPro
I get it. You're just perpetually miffed that Epstein is a Leftist issue, and despite all the efforts to include Trump into his illegal antics, there's zero there to show he or any other prominent conservative had such dealings.
It's literally eating THE LEFT up.
It's literally eating THE LEFT up.
Posted on 3/15/26 at 8:15 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
I get it. You're just perpetually miffed that Epstein is a Leftist issue,
quote:
there's zero there to show he or any other prominent conservative had such dealings.
There is nothing to show basically anyone else, conservative or otherwise, participated in his illegal sexual behavior.
quote:
It's literally eating THE LEFT up.
The Left has nothing to do with me or this thread, and you've yet to explain it other than pulling an Ian Carroll and inserting Epstein into a situation dishonestly.
Posted on 3/15/26 at 8:27 am to WarBoudin
Holy crap Batman. You are meth’d up.
Posted on 3/15/26 at 8:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
inserting Epstein into a situation dishonestly.
Literally in the subject line.
Double
Posted on 3/15/26 at 8:50 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Literally in the subject line.
Labeling that inclusion a lie.
Which, as has been explained to you 3 times now, means Epstein isn't actually involved in any way.
Which, as has been explained to you even more times now, means inserting Epstein into this story where he isn't involved is engaging in the same dishonest behavior.
Posted on 3/15/26 at 9:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
anti-Zionism into antisemitism which has rhetoric issues, as I pointed out when MAGA types tried to do just this with the anti-Israel protests
Yeah, the left would never mask their antisemitism as anti Zionism
Posted on 3/15/26 at 9:39 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Yeah, the left would never mask their antisemitism as anti Zionism
Not shocking you'd promote this retarded MAGA NPC silliness.
It's not 2024 anymore. The talking points have changed, NPC. You must have missed the software update.
Page 8 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News