- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I just watched the Tucker interview with Larry Sinclair.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:34 pm to ScottFowler
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:34 pm to ScottFowler
Libs are just mad that the veil is being pulled back. Their heroes are being exposed for the horrible humans that they are. Barry, Joe, Big Mike- they’re all the worst sort of people.
Someone very powerful allowed this to come out. The question we should be asking is “Why?”
Someone very powerful allowed this to come out. The question we should be asking is “Why?”
3
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:37 pm to Placekicker
quote:
Libs are just mad that the veil is being pulled back.
None of this is new.
Larry Sinclair published a book about this same shite around 2008/2009.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:43 pm to Placekicker
This isn't a bombshell. This guy is the origin of the Obama gay crackhead side quest already, and it didn't stop anything. Obama isn't running, Sinclair was flushed out early in 2008 and has nothing to gain by repeating his story. He looks like he hasn't ever gained anything from the story.
The fact there doesn't seem to be a motive or a clear consequence to this is partly why I believe it. In the absence of clear ulterior motive, the truth in spite of lies is usually the motive.
Tucker's motive is clicks, but he also seems intent on telling stories he wasn't allowed to tell before.
The fact there doesn't seem to be a motive or a clear consequence to this is partly why I believe it. In the absence of clear ulterior motive, the truth in spite of lies is usually the motive.
Tucker's motive is clicks, but he also seems intent on telling stories he wasn't allowed to tell before.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:48 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Would you trust Sinclair with your wallet?
Would you trust him with your dicck in his mouth?
Obama did.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:53 pm to L1C4
quote:
Remember when Tucker wouldn't have Sidney Powell on his show because she didn't have proof of her claims?
Which turned out to be a smart move.
But now he has this clown Sinclair on. WTF
I don't think Tucker would run with this if he cannot back it up. Think about it rationally. Tucker would not risk what he is trying to build after Fox if this were BS. You do you, though.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:55 pm to BeepNode
quote:What about gay pride? I would think you all would be celebrating if it's true.
Congrats on being gay.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:58 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Gut instinct: Most, if not all of his story is true. Just a read and I wouldn't die on that hill without evidence. He doesn't seem encumbered by remembering previously told lies to maintain a story. Very nonchalant, no hesitation, no obvious contradiction. I agree his demeanor and recount of events is much more believable than Christine Blasey-Ford (sp?). I wonder how he'd do in a Senate committee hearing.
Agree totally - compared to any of the other crud the mainslime media has vomited out over the past 20 years - this guy was absolute truth.
ands compared to that he was outright perfect.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:01 pm to Speckhunter2012
quote:
I don't think Tucker would run with this if he cannot back it up.
Larry Sinclair took two polygraph tests on this back in 2008. One about the drug use claims and one about the sexual claims.
He failed them both.
The results that indicated deception were independently reviewed by two other examiners and they corroborated the results.
Tucker is just reheating a stale bowl of bullshite and you dumbasses are just reaching for a spoon.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:03 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Tucker's motive is clicks, but he also seems intent on telling stories he wasn't allowed to tell before.
Tuckers motive is a reckoning
Dude is worth 500 million
WTF?
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:04 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
Was it as saucy as you hoped for?
Not to answer for Flex but Sinclair's account of his encounter with BO isn't particularly shocking. I think it's become quite apparent over the past 10-15 years that BO was probably the worst thing to happen to the constitutional republic.....but I think Biden has a great shot at dethroning BO and becoming the worst thing to happen to the constitutional republic.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:04 pm to FlexDawg
I am Barry's bruised battered and broken butthole.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:08 pm to bamadontcare
quote:
Tuckers motive is a reckoning
Tucker probably got a list of all the folks that matter who called for his firing.
Everyone of them is shitting bricks now that X gives him unrestricted access to cover and expose whatever he chooses.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:16 pm to Speckhunter2012
quote:
I don't think Tucker would run with this if he cannot back it up. Think about it rationally. Tucker would not risk what he is trying to build after Fox if this were BS. --
Do you suppose that Sinclair has been keeping "That Shirt"
with Barry's juice on the collar and front?
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:16 pm to Speckhunter2012
Damn! Automatic double post again. Fix that bug.
This post was edited on 9/6/23 at 8:19 pm
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:17 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
Tucker is just reheating a stale bowl of bull shite and you dumbasses are just reaching for a spoon
Obama is a God to be worshipped to you liberals, and even though you think a man sucking another man’s dick is “stunning and brave” you don’t want to have to admit Obama is gay because then you’d have to admit your god lied to you.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:35 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
polygraph tests
I wonder if corrupt people could cover up lie detector tests?
Nah, surely not.
That would be like a pathologist performing an autopsy report claiming someone who took a deadly amount of fentanyl died of strangulation.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:36 pm to ImaObserver
quote:
Damn! Automatic double post again. Fix that bug.
It only happens to demofeds.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:45 pm to FlexDawg
Didn’t he pass a polygraph test? Thought they said that on Newsmax earlier.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:47 pm to L1C4
I don’t think he is. Seems pretty genuine.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:48 pm to L1C4
I also think he’s dirtbag POS regarding his, umm… hobbies… but a dirt bag POS knows another dirt bag POS like him when he sees one.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News