- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I believe the WSJ story about Trump being told his name is in Epstien files is a set up
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:25 am to udtiger
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:25 am to udtiger
The idea that Trump doesn't know every detail about the Epstein files is moronic.
He knows, and has known, everything for 10 years or more.
He knows, and has known, everything for 10 years or more.
0
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:37 am to gumbeaux
quote:
He said it over and over in his campaign rallies without being asked
Should be pretty easy for you to find video of that, in that case. I know I'd love to see it.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:43 am to mmmmmbeeer
quote:First off, the intel reports were classified. So whether or not it's old news to the intel committees, it is new information for the rest of Congress as well as the public. Second, any rebuttal was only as valuable as the information and interpretations provided Congress by the intel community at the time.
You realize the report she's released is just the 2017 report from the House Intelligence Committee, right? A report which was thoroughly discredited at the time and completely made a sham by Marco Rubio's bipartisan Senate Intelligence report.
In fact, there was and is zero evidence Russia impacted the 2016 election, nor is there even evidence that the Russians preferred Trump over Hillary. Their expectation was that Hillary would win. That is what intel showed. It is not remotely what intel passed on.
So, to be clear, you're dismissing out of hand the fact our intel leaders did everything they could to undercut the incoming administration 8 fricking years ago. The DNI even went so far as to label Trump as "Russian Asset." Shy of a state-sponsored assassination attempt, it does not get much worse than that.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:54 am to NC_Tigah
A woman notified the FBI twice after the Epstein story broke in 2006 and said Trump should be investigated because he stared at her legs in 1996. Wow what a bombshell.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:55 am to mmmmmbeeer
quote:You have no idea WTF you're talking about.
How is it possible for a point to fly so far over someone's head?
The problem is much of the material you are bitching about was presented to the Florida grand jury. Got it?
If the DOJ had simply released that information prior to seeking court approval, that action would have been illegal, and the lawyers carrying it forward would have been in a world of hurt.
We'll see what the second circuit ruling shows, but that is the problem.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:00 am to udtiger
Why do people think that there is a list out there of people who partook in perversion at Epstein's island? It isn't that simple.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:01 am to udtiger
People need to understand what this likely means.
Did trump attend the same parties or events as Epstein? Yes.
There fore he may have been questioned about his evening or interactions with JE.
If anyone of us were at home and it was discovered one of our close neighbors was murdered and the police ask you when was the last time you saw them, did you notice any uncommon vehicles in the area, if their spouse is a suspect, they may ask you about their character, etc.
Congratulations, your name is in that report and those files. It in no way implies you are guilty of any crime.
Also, Occam's razor says if he was implicated in any of the slightest way, these goobers would have dropped this bombshell years ago when they were in charge.
Did trump attend the same parties or events as Epstein? Yes.
There fore he may have been questioned about his evening or interactions with JE.
If anyone of us were at home and it was discovered one of our close neighbors was murdered and the police ask you when was the last time you saw them, did you notice any uncommon vehicles in the area, if their spouse is a suspect, they may ask you about their character, etc.
Congratulations, your name is in that report and those files. It in no way implies you are guilty of any crime.
Also, Occam's razor says if he was implicated in any of the slightest way, these goobers would have dropped this bombshell years ago when they were in charge.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:07 am to RobbBobb
quote:
I now believe Trump is ready to, yet again, lead the haters off the cliff
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:18 am to udtiger
quote:
Second, there is no explanation as to how his name is in there - client list or just the flight log info we already know?
It is possible that this is so . . .
It's interesting that they moved to unseal the grand jury testimony in Florida, back when Epstein reached that plea deal.
I do believe I've seen an interview with one of the victim's lawyers that Trump was helpful to the criminal/civil investigation. We also know that Trump kicked Epstein out of Maralago - and I've always heard that it was bc Epstein perved on an underage employee.
It is quite possible that Trump was either an informant or even testified in those proceedings.
The real mystery to me is, and forever will be, why all these other powerful people continued to hang out with Epstein after that original plea deal. The scandal with Epstein is a deep state one, not a sex one.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:25 am to udtiger
Trump needs to be removed from office and replaced with JD
This is beyond embarrassing.
This is beyond embarrassing.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:40 am to udtiger
It will be interesting to see if Trump drops a lawsuit on this new story.
I’m the meantime, the WSJ has hired a heavy hitter on the first suit.
I’m the meantime, the WSJ has hired a heavy hitter on the first suit.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 8:08 am to Pezzo
quote:
its a distraction from the current releases by Tulsi. In yesterdays press briefing she flat out said Obama committed Treason in front of all the media heads and no one batted an eye.
Yes. Definitely this. Definitely not the other way around. No one batted an eye because she sucks.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 10:14 am to udtiger
Of course it is. Deep State doing Deep State things.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 10:22 am to andouille
quote:
Why do people think that there is a list out there of people who partook in perversion at Epstein's island? It isn't that simple.
When asked about it:
Kash Patel said the FBI Director possessed Epstein’s black book(s).
Pam Bondi said the list is on her desk.
The people prefer simplicity. They eat it up without thinking twice about it.
Nuance is not on the menu.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News