Started By
Message

re: I believe the WSJ story about Trump being told his name is in Epstien files is a set up

Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:34 am to
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
10189 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Epstein bros blame Trump for trying to unseal actual testimony


Dude, it was widely reported, at least in the real media, that the grand jury request was complete bullshite as those transcripts are RARELY released and only under certain circumstances. This was proven by the Florida judge yesterday who essentially said "my hands are tied, can't release".

It was an empty gesture so why are you acting like it was some yuge sign of transparency from this admin?
Posted by Gifman
Clearwater Beach, FL
Member since Jan 2021
18917 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:35 am to
quote:

mmmmmbeeer


Oh boy it just got real creepy in here.
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
6035 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:37 am to
Let me get this straight, they can’t legally release them according to the judge but somehow that is also Trump’s fault. Trump is right, I wouldn’t listen to any of you goofballs
Posted by LSUnation78
Northshore
Member since Aug 2012
14230 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:37 am to
We already knew “his name appears”

He was a party to prior trials.



The prosecutor in that trial openly stated the Donald was the only individual who tried to help their case. He was noted as being a extremely forthcoming with information. Even thanked Trump.

So yea, his name is involved the files. We know.
This post was edited on 7/24/25 at 8:38 am
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
10189 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:37 am to
quote:

Question is what does it say? Again - I don't think he is that type of person


I don't think Trump is a pedo by nature...he may have dabbled in "close enough to being of age", but I don't think he's anything like an Epstein.

He's hiding this because he knows that the evidence will point to him not only being friends with Epstein, but being VERY aware of what Epstein was up to and not doing anything to stop it. Same with Clinton. It's a horrible look and anyone who was aware of what was happening and did nothing to stop it should be called out publicly, whether they participated or not.
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
10189 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:40 am to
quote:


Let me get this straight, they can’t legally release them according to the judge but somehow that is also Trump’s fault.


How is it possible for a point to fly so far over someone's head?
Posted by LSUnation78
Northshore
Member since Aug 2012
14230 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:40 am to
quote:

not doing anything to stop it.



Wtf was he supposed to do, go liam Nesson on epstein? Trump wasn’t in charge if anything except mar a lago, where Epstein was banned from once it was discovered he had recruited from staff at the resort.

Old prosecutor said Trump was actively helping their case against epstein.
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
6035 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:40 am to
The irony in your own self own is astounding
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32765 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:41 am to
quote:

In yesterdays press briefing she flat out said Obama committed Treason in front of all the media heads and no one batted an eye.


Probably because it’s an extremely silly claim.
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
10189 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Wtf was he supposed to do, go liam Nesson on epstein?


If you find out your neighbor is fricking little kids, you wouldn't know what to do with that information? Really?
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
6035 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:42 am to
You mean like Trump being a Russian agent and a child sex trafficker yet you had no problem believing those? Doddering old fool
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
10189 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:42 am to
quote:

The irony in your own self own is astounding


English motherfricker. Do you speak it?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167605 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:46 am to
The reason this is going away-if not gone. AND Trump can't sue them for this one. Is because beyond the paywalls of articles it says it is a nothing burger.

Bill Kristol is desperately trying to say crucify Trump for lying to a reporter that he wasn't told his name was in files.

The WSJ part that is paywalled says this
quote:

"In May, Bondi and her deputy informed the president at a meeting in the White House that his name was in the Epstein files, the officials said. Many other high-profile figures were also named, Trump was told. Being mentioned in the records isn’t a sign of wrongdoing.
Trump has always been known to be in a black book rolodex-- with many others never accused of wrongdoing. If I am reading correctly Trump's name was in the binders, listed as accused of no wrong doing.
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
6035 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:48 am to
Listen boy wonder, let me break it down for you in terms you can understand like your Fortnite bros: Trump isn’t obsessed with the Epstein files because he is too busy being President and attempted to have the actual transcripts released. I am sorry that you are more interested in knowing who Epstein had sex with than improving the nation. That feels like a “you” problem
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
6396 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:51 am to
So what?. Epstein could have had a list of high profile targets that he was trying to get there, etc etc.
Millions of reasons why Trumps name, or anyone else's, could originally have been in the report, or have been placed in report later.
Russiagate wasn't the only thing those felons were cooking up to stop MAGA
Posted by LSUnation78
Northshore
Member since Aug 2012
14230 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:55 am to
Neighbor?

My neighbor doesn’t live on an evil villain island.



I don’t think neighbor means what you think it does.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
24865 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:05 am to
It is interesting how hard the MSM tries to play up the tenuous at best links between Trump and Epstein but ignore the Clinton links.


Also interesting how Trumps relationship with Epstein 30 years ago is relevant but Obama cooking intelligence I
Less than 10 years ago is too old of news to report on.

Posted by gumbeaux
Member since Jun 2004
5327 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:05 am to
quote:


He never campaigned on releasing them. He mentioned it when questioned about it but it was never a core campaign promise that is just another fantasy created by the Epstein obsession


That is incorrect. His campaign promise was to release the Epstein, MLK, and JFK files. He said it over and over in his campaign rallies without being asked. JD Vance did the same thing.
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
6035 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:10 am to
He mentioned them in interviews when being questioned. You are the one factually incorrect. I have been to two Trump rallies and not once was Epstein or MLK mentioned nor was it ever brought up in a single debate. I am sorry you believe in fairytales
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
13872 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:23 am to
DUH.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram