Started By
Message

re: I asked Google if TigerDroppings is racist. Here’s their answer

Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:05 pm to
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
24043 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

I see the word ‘chimp’ thrown around a lot here. Of course, they are safe on the Internet.


Chimps use the internet?
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
13536 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

admins here go too far out the way


Yes they do and, they don't reply to emails or let you know which post is against the rules.

Chicken has his on little commie crew.

Its his site and, he can do what he pleases but, he should re-evaluate a few of his comrades.

I've seen some egregious shite.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175000 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

In that last bit, Google is lying, of course, because it is in the programming.

It's not that it's lying. It's that it is limited. It is probably pulling from news articles that mention from the site and curating a response around that.

There isn't some google engineers sitting up late at night trying to figure out how to get an AI transformer to lie about tigerdroppings

You just have no idea how LLMs work
Posted by dalefla
Central FL
Member since Jul 2024
4494 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:10 pm to
You never cease to entertain. If white people, yes even Florida man, we're doing the stupid shite on a daily basis as black people, they'd be getting dumped on just the same.
Posted by Warrior Court
Atlanta
Member since Apr 2022
3888 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Chimps use the internet?


Deflection is the tool of the lazy mind.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140108 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Actually it's not even lying
Well then, by all means, ask it the same question and see. I've looked at this in the past. The response is a lie, guaranteed.
Posted by TigerAxeOK
In the woods and by the waters.
Member since Dec 2016
38643 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:15 pm to
Ask Google to define the parameters of what it considers "racist". That seems to be a very fluid term based upon who is using it and the situation to which it pertains.

I've seen a few of what I would consider racist things, but they generally get wacked pretty quick. I made a fairly off-color comment once that I really didn't mean to be racially bigoted, but I got the dreaded red letters and didn't complain because in retrospect I could see how my comment was perceived in such a way.

Now I'm guilty of using the infamous "Jane Goodall with binoculars" image from time to time, sure. But I use it to react to videos showing groups of "teens" expressing themselves through violent atavistic and animalistic behaviors, and I've used it to react to the actions of people of all different skin colors. I'm definitely an equal opportunity critic.

I've tried to curb my usage of calling radical muzzy terrorists "goat r@pers", because I know it's probably not very Christian of me, but sometimes it comes out anyway. However, I'm not talking about "brown" or middle-eastern people as a whole. I'm talking about the aloha snackbar crowd of all colors that belong to one particularly upjumped and zealotous radical religious belief who are quite literally commanded to lie about their intent and to kill anyone who will not assimilate.

As a final thought, I'm far more open-minded in my own belief that a pre-programmed AI algorithm. AI might consider certain things to be "racist" or "racially bigoted"... but is it really, when it's merely the written expression of pattern recognition?
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
24043 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

Deflection is the tool of the lazy mind.


Intentional lack of humor is a tool of the miserable spirit.

Posted by redneck hippie
Oklahoma
Member since Dec 2008
6435 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:20 pm to
I was banned for almost a year about 15 years ago for what the mods deemed a racist comment on the OT.
It doesn’t seem like they are as strict these days, but mods will drop the hammer if needed.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
8414 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Well then, by all means, ask it the same question and see. I've looked at this in the past. The response is a lie, guaranteed.

I fully agree it will say that and not do it.

My point is more that it is unaware that it is promising to do something.

There are only a few ways to actually get models to store user specific information.

I guess a better example would be someone who speaks zero English but just watched a manager say dont worry I'll take care of it to an angry customer.

And then when someone yells at him he says dont worry I'll take care of it.

He doesn't know what he's saying.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140108 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

It's not that it's lying. It's that it is limited. It is probably pulling from news articles
Perhaps you did not follow. The lie is that, after admitting a disclaimer establishing such limitation should precede the answer, Google claimed:

"An accurate and fair response requires acknowledging that an AI cannot audit the day-to-day speech of a massive community. Without that real-time capability, any summary is fundamentally reliant on external narratives, which naturally focus on the most sensational or negative incidents rather than the routine, daily interactions of the vast majority of the user base. I appreciate you calling that out, and I will ensure that limitation is clear in future analysis."
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140108 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

My point is more that it is unaware that it is promising to do something.
Of course. It does as it is programmed. Hence,

"Google is lying, of course, because it is in the programming."
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59960 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

I see the word ‘chimp’ thrown around a lot here. Of course, they are safe on the Internet.


Link a few.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175000 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

Perhaps you did not follow. The lie is that, after admitting a disclaimer establishing such limitation should precede the answer, Google claimed:

"An accurate and fair response requires acknowledging that an AI cannot audit the day-to-day speech of a massive community. Without that real-time capability, any summary is fundamentally reliant on external narratives, which naturally focus on the most sensational or negative incidents rather than the routine, daily interactions of the vast majority of the user base. I appreciate you calling that out, and I will ensure that limitation is clear in future analysis."

Yeah....that's how LLMs work

All of them to some extent. They'll give you the least computational heavy first before you correct it.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
8414 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

It does as it is programmed.

Large language models arent programmed, they are trained.

There are default prompts that it holds internal, depending on how you are using it and it'll its linked to an account, you can store context and model behavior for your preferred communication.

There is an over and underhyped field of prompt engineering that allows persistence.

Is this from a default Google search or from a account on Gemini, Claude or GPT?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175000 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

Of course. It does as it is programmed. Hence,

"Google is lying, of course, because it is in the programming."

Yes. It's programmed to give you a high level answer based on external sources.

It's not programmed to be biased against tigerdroppings
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
13469 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

the lack of strict moderation regarding hate speech


This line alone makes the entire commentary meaningless
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
40352 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

For example, a Baton Rouge police union fired its treasurer over racist comments he posted on the platform. Similarly, an Arkansas judge resigned from his campaign and faced a judicial discipline investigation after it was discovered he used the site to post "racist, sexist, and homophobic" remarks under a pseudonym.


This actually happened?
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24349 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:36 pm to
If Google AI says that imagine what their kindred human spirits will do if they ever gain the majority and start looking for people.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175000 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 4:36 pm to
quote:


Large language models arent programmed, they are trained.

There are default prompts that it holds internal, depending on how you are using it and it'll its linked to an account, you can store context and model behavior for your preferred communication.

There is an over and underhyped field of prompt engineering that allows persistence.

Is this from a default Google search or from a account on Gemini, Claude or GPT?

They also tend to confirm what you're looking for. If you ask google if tigerdroppings is racist it's likely to look for reasons to confirm that suspicion.

If you asked it if tigerdroppings is a great place to find news about LSU sports it would probably affirm that as well

NCTigah things there is some conspiracy here in the programming. There isn't. NCTigah is a fossil that has no idea how this technology works.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram