re: How three conspiracy theorists took 'Q' and sparked Q-anon

Q is mostly Dan Scavino. I believe Bannon actually made a couple of post (I base that on the writing style).

quote:

---

NBC has revealed three conspiracy theorists through their own errors as the likely creators of the "Q" account.

---

Nice try black hats.

From your article:
Timing is emphasized...

quote:

---

November 2017, a small-time YouTube video creator and two moderators of the 4chan website, one of the most extreme message boards on the internet, banded together and plucked out of obscurity an anonymous and cryptic post from the many conspiracy theories that populated the website's message board.

Over the next several months, they would create videos, a Reddit community, a business and an entire mythology based off the 4chan posts of “Q,” the pseudonym of a person claiming to be a high-ranking military officer. The theory they espoused would become Qanon, and it would eventually make its way from those message boards to national media stories and the rallies of President Donald Trump.

---

NY Times

quote:

---

What Is QAnon: Explaining the Internet Conspiracy Theory That Showed Up at a Trump Rally

Do you remember Pizzagate? It’s a little like that: a web of baseless conspiracy theories. And its supporters were highly visible at an event for the president in Florida.

---

quote:

---

Here is the short version: Q claims to be a government insider exposing an entrenched, international bureaucracy that is secretly plotting all sorts of nefarious schemes against the Trump administration and its supporters. The character uses lingo that implies that he or she has a military or intelligence background.

It’s a stew of various, but connecting, conspiracy theories that generally hold Mr. Trump as a conquistador battling a cabal of anti-American saboteurs who have taken over government, industry, media and various other institutions of public life in a plan to … well, the overarching goals of the nefarious actors are not clear.

---

The Intercept

quote:

---

TRUMP WHITE HOUSE WEIGHING PLANS FOR PRIVATE SPIES TO COUNTER “DEEP STATE” ENEMIES

Matthew Cole, Jeremy Scahill
December 4 2017, 9:24 p.m.

---

quote:

---

THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION is considering a set of proposals developed by Blackwater founder Erik Prince and a retired CIA officer — with assistance from Oliver North, a key figure in the Iran-Contra scandal — to provide CIA Director Mike Pompeo and the White House with a global, private spy network that would circumvent official U.S. intelligence agencies, according to several current and former U.S. intelligence officials and others familiar with the proposals. The sources say the plans have been pitched to the White House as a means of countering “deep state” enemies in the intelligence community seeking to undermine Donald Trump’s presidency.

The creation of such a program raises the possibility that the effort would be used to create an intelligence apparatus to justify the Trump administration’s political agenda.

“Pompeo can’t trust the CIA bureaucracy, so we need to create this thing that reports just directly to him,” said a former senior U.S. intelligence official with firsthand knowledge of the proposals, in describing White House discussions. “It is a direct-action arm, totally off the books,” this person said, meaning the intelligence collected would not be shared with the rest of the CIA or the larger intelligence community. “The whole point is this is supposed to report to the president and Pompeo directly.”

---

Hmmm...

quote:

---

The proposals would utilize an army of spies with no official cover in several countries deemed “denied areas” for current American intelligence personnel, including North Korea and Iran. The White House has also considered creating a new global rendition unit meant to capture terrorist suspects around the world, as well as a propaganda campaign in the Middle East and Europe to combat Islamic extremism and Iran.

---

Hmmm...
Again, this article is from 12/2017. MSM was telling us that NK was getting ready to nuke us at that time...

quote:

---

“[Maguire] said there were people inside the CIA who joined in the previous eight years [under Obama] and inside the government, and they were failing to give the president the intelligence he needed,” said a person who was pitched by Maguire and other Amyntor personnel. To support his claim, Maguire told at least two people that National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, in coordination with a top official at the National Security Agency, authorized surveillance of Steven Bannon and Trump family members, including Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump. Adding to these unsubstantiated claims, Maguire told the potential donors he also had evidence McMaster used a burner phone to send information gathered through the surveillance to a facility in Cyprus owned by George Soros.

---

quote:

---

Why did she leave us for chan?

---

She posted here?

She does some solid work on twitter

quote:

---

NBC has revealed three conspiracy theorists through their own errors as the likely creators of the "Q" account.

---

NBC can't get a simple poll correct. What makes you think the geniuses there over at the MSM are putting forth the effort to figure out who Q anon is?

Know how I know the left is scared of Q???

Why the need to discredit? If they wanted ratings and clicks it behooves them to romanticize the mystery. Why are they acting in opposition to their own self interest by fabricating stories which pretend to reveal the identity of Q?
Anyone?
Anyone?
Bueller?

quote:

---

now that you know you're following these guys and not some deeply-embedded intelligence source?

---

quote:

---

While the identity of the original author or authors behind “Q” is still unknown

---

FUD.

quote:

---

So, who is Q?

---

Some random person with no power, originally.

Now? 3 conspiracy-minded nobodies with no power, looking to profit off of the fears and inability to distinguish fact from fiction of some on the right.

quote:

---

The conversation is still ongoing.

---

Not here - this thread is already anchored.