- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How is the Mueller trial against the Russian election meddlers going?
Posted on 11/23/18 at 7:15 am
Posted on 11/23/18 at 7:15 am
I haven’t heard anything lately. Any updates?
10
Posted on 11/23/18 at 7:25 am to Meauxjeaux
his main problem is the charged entities didn’t exist at the time of the alleged crimes coupled with the fact the charges are completely made up. Other than that going pretty well 
Posted on 11/23/18 at 7:29 am to Meauxjeaux
Last I heard, the Judge allowed the Defense motion requiring the Prosecution to present evidence that the charges are actually crimes. 
Posted on 11/23/18 at 7:31 am to Sidicous
quote:
charges are actually crimes.
This is the best the teams of Ivy League Democrat lawyers can manufacture?
This post was edited on 11/23/18 at 7:31 am
Posted on 11/23/18 at 7:35 am to Sidicous
Was there a deadline for this? That’s what I remember. They actually showed up and fought back.
Posted on 11/23/18 at 7:37 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
Was there a deadline for this? That’s what I remember. They actually showed up and fought back.
Honest Bob brought the charges assuming they would never show up so the media could point and say “OMG collusion the Russians meddled here’s proof!!!”
When they showed up to court it all unraveled with the quickness
Posted on 11/23/18 at 7:40 am to Strannix
quote:
When they showed up to court it all unraveled with the quickness
They’re working out a way to charge Trump with obstruction of justice for this ploy.
Posted on 11/23/18 at 7:53 am to Meauxjeaux
Still in the manufacturing stage. Check back in a year or two.
Posted on 11/23/18 at 7:57 am to Meauxjeaux
Boris and Natasha still locked in the Trump Towers; soon Natasha will throw down her Rumpelstiltskin hair and they will escape before honest bob finds out.
Posted on 11/23/18 at 8:12 am to Meauxjeaux
I heard that he was ready to present his findings that Trump did it in the Conservatory with the candlestick.
Posted on 11/23/18 at 8:22 am to Meauxjeaux
I'm pretty sure they got him again.
Posted on 11/23/18 at 9:08 am to Meauxjeaux
Posted on 11/23/18 at 9:18 am to boosiebadazz
Of course it was. The defense was trying to get any evidence of the alleged crimes produced. Why hasn’t Mueller produced the evidence to the defendants?
Posted on 11/23/18 at 9:21 am to BBONDS25
I’m not a part of the S.C. so I don’t know that answer.
I just gave the OP the update he asked for.
I just gave the OP the update he asked for.
Posted on 11/23/18 at 9:22 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
I’m not a part of the S.C. so I don’t know that answer.
How common is It to not produce any evidence to a defendant or the court? Have you EVER seen it before?
Posted on 11/23/18 at 9:24 am to BBONDS25
Even the Politico article says S.C. may end dismissing them instead of giving them the evidence
I think there is a November 28th deadline to update the Court on the status, so we may know more then.
I think there is a November 28th deadline to update the Court on the status, so we may know more then.
Posted on 11/23/18 at 9:25 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Even the Politico article says S.C. may end dismissing them instead of giving them the evidence
Have you EVER seen that?
Posted on 11/23/18 at 9:26 am to BBONDS25
They’re going to end up dropping those charges to not turn over documents. It’s in the article posted and even he can’t spin that stuff.
Posted on 11/23/18 at 9:28 am to BBONDS25
I have limited federal criminal court experience, but no. I can imagine national security/ espionage situations where the government would want to protect the source of the evidence against the accused.
The rumbling is Mueller doesn’t want to turn the evidence over because “sources and methods” but who knows.
I think we’ll know more after the 28th.
The rumbling is Mueller doesn’t want to turn the evidence over because “sources and methods” but who knows.
I think we’ll know more after the 28th.
Posted on 11/23/18 at 9:29 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
The rumbling is Mueller doesn’t want to turn the evidence over because “sources and methods” but who knows. I think we’ll know more after the 28th.
I hope so. I want to know why he would indict them if he knew he wouldn’t/couldn’t produce the evidence.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News