- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How is banging a pornstar and a playmate a bad thing?
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:20 pm to OMLandshark
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:20 pm to OMLandshark
Blue collar whites would have not turned out for rand, who is not appealing to them on trade and cultural issues.
1
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:20 pm to TopJimmy
quote:
I grabbed at pussy when I was young, and got the shite knocked out of me.
Thank you for telling me your moral integrity. I'll be sure to ignore you from now on.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:22 pm to themunch
quote:He's right though. Constitutional rights don't just extend to Citizens, especially since it's more of limits on government anyways. You can disagree whether they should be the case, but it's just wrong to argue that it's not the case.
wow
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:23 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
And btw you bolding “people” doesn’t mean shite when it’s obvious the FFs wrote it with the citizens (the people) in mind.
No they didn't. They wrote it with the people at large in mind. What if a foreign dignitary was accused of something while living on US soil? What was to stop the American populace from lynching the French Ambassador just from accusations? The Founders thought this through. It's about anyone in our borders.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:24 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:You have absolutely no idea what would have happened. None of us do. But given how dramatic your views and emotions shifted throughout the election, you seem like an especially poor judge of that would have happened.
Blue collar whites would have not turned out for rand, who is not appealing to them on trade and cultural issues.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:24 pm to OMLandshark
They have immunity
Most would be tried in their home country. Has something changed in that regard?
Most would be tried in their home country. Has something changed in that regard?
This post was edited on 3/20/18 at 11:27 pm
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:27 pm to OMLandshark
That's not a good example.
Amendment 10
To the people means voters. You can't vote if you aren't a citizen.
Amendment 10
quote:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
To the people means voters. You can't vote if you aren't a citizen.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:27 pm to themunch
quote:
You know who those rights were written for and to not acknowledge that it foolishness.
Yes, people within our borders. That's who it was written for. Why do you think Gitmo is such a hot issue? If we could do whatever the frick we wanted with people within our borders, do you think that would be such a hot issue?
quote:
I understand the courts allowed for the language to be used to extend those rights.
I was not the purpose of the original language.
Wrong. The language was concise and exceptionally deliberate. They didn't want citizens in the future debating this. I know this probably pisses you off when people question the 2nd Amendment when they conflate the militia and the people. You're right to be pissed, because you are right in the interpretation of that very deliberate wording just so corrupt bureaucrats in the future couldn't take your guns from you.
This post was edited on 3/20/18 at 11:32 pm
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:27 pm to OMLandshark
quote:Thanks in advance, I hope there is a function on this board to ignore posts. I'll research and see, maybe I can exclude millennial snowflakes. That would be sweet.
Thank you for telling me your moral integrity. I'll be sure to ignore you from now on.
You would be number one, Chuckie.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:28 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:It's not the Constitution for the entire world but is the Constitution for anyone who is within the jurisdiction of the government the Constitution limits.
And btw you bolding “people” doesn’t mean shite when it’s obvious the FFs wrote it with the citizens (the people) in mind.
It’s not the Constitution for the entire world.
You're free to argue the founders had a different intent, although that would actually be counter to a lot of their principles and why they led a revolution and they wrote the Constitution.
But rights extending beyond citizens was settled hundreds of years ago, so it's just flat out wrong to say that they don't.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:30 pm to themunch
quote:
Most would be tried in their home country. Has something changed in that regard?
It depends on their crime. If a British person murders a citizen on our soil, then we're trying them here, and they'll be incarcerated here if they're pronounced guilty.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:30 pm to TopJimmy
quote:
Thanks in advance, I hope there is a function on this board to ignore posts. I'll research and see,
I'll save you the trouble. There is no ignore function.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:30 pm to buckeye_vol
So, the 15th amendment gave illegal aliens in the US jurisdiction the right to vote?
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:30 pm to PaperTiger
quote:
To the people means voters. You can't vote if you aren't a citizen.
Then what protects non-citizens?
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:31 pm to OMLandshark
Where did they come from?
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:32 pm to PaperTiger
quote:So women only gained Constitutional rights 100 years ago?
To the people means voters. You can't vote if you aren't a citizen.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:32 pm to themunch
quote:
Where did they come from?
What do you mean where did they come from? Why can't we just lynch someone from the UK if we think he raped someone?
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:34 pm to OMLandshark
Then what protects non-citizens?
undocumented or better known as illegal is not simply a non citizen.
There are those here legally who should be afforded legal protections short of rights of citizens. I suppose now we have to define what are the rights of citizens and why they differ.
undocumented or better known as illegal is not simply a non citizen.
There are those here legally who should be afforded legal protections short of rights of citizens. I suppose now we have to define what are the rights of citizens and why they differ.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:34 pm to OMLandshark
Now it's a constitutional debate. The thread is about whores, people. Whores.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:35 pm to northshorebamaman
Page 7 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News