Started By
Message

re: How can the average person afford to live?

Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:26 pm to
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13430 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

I can want Trump to win over Biden and still use my vote to show support for Kanye when I knew Arkansas was going for Trump. Both things can be true at the same time


Tell me what planks of Kanye's platform you wanted to show support for.
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
34145 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

that is NOT why millennials can't afford housing.


Housing prices outpacing inflation by 150% has nothing to do with affordability? How are you this stupid?

Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38343 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

He's either too stupid or too dishonest (or both) to acknowledge that.
I quit reading this nonsense about 15 pages ago and saw it pop up again so I saw his post. I don't even understand his point anymore, other than "nothing is fair, waahhhh!"
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
25907 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Housing prices outpacing inflation by 150%


Really is wild even in south MS my home has appreciated by damn near 50% in five years. My last home was basically break even when accounting for my upgrades after 12-1/2 years. I know I wouldn’t have bought my current home at these prices.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13430 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

Housing prices outpacing inflation by 150% has nothing to do with affordability? How are you this stupid?


O.k., idiot, here we go.

Let's take the article you just quoted. That $177,788 that houses are "supposed" to be?

If interest rates were what they were when many of us or our parents bought houses, here's how that would break down on that $177,788.

30 year mortgage, principal paid would be $177,788.

Interest would be $456,034.96.

For a total of $633,822.96.

If you take a house for $450,000 at today's interest rates and run the numbers according to average interest rates for the past five years, you get this:

Principal paid: $450,000
Interest paid: $309,469.34

For a total of $759,469.34

The second scenario is higher, yes. By 16%.

You're telling me that the total cost of home ownership being 16% higher now vs 1980 is why people "can't live" and are completely incapable of buying homes?

If so, one of us is so stupid that it's amazing that we can pull up our pants after taking a dump, but it's not me.

There are a dozen ways of dealing with a 16% gap.

EDIT: BTW, I used 11.5% just because we have a poster who bought a house at that interest rate. The interest rate got as high as 16.63% in the 80s. At that point the $177,000 house is actually more expensive than the $450,000 house.

By a lot.

But I don't remember my parents wailing and moaning and gnashing teeth and crying and whining. They just bought a house, cut back on everything else they had to cut back on, and lived their lives.
This post was edited on 9/5/23 at 3:57 pm
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13430 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:44 pm to
quote:


Housing prices outpacing inflation by 150% has nothing to do with affordability? How are you this stupid?


BTW, I missed your dishonesty the first time around.

Show me where I said it has "nothing" to do with affordability.

I have now concluded that in addition to being stupid, you are, in fact, dishonest as well.
This post was edited on 9/5/23 at 3:45 pm
Posted by LARancher1991
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2015
2245 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:47 pm to
Now do that combined with rising prices across the board? Do that cost with gas, utilities, groceries, vehicle notes, etc.?
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13430 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Now do that combined with rising prices across the board? Do that cost with gas, utilities, groceries, vehicle notes, etc.?


I already did. I did groceries, cell phones, washing machines, and television sets.

You idiots who think everything was cheaper back then are going to get a surprise when you start actually looking into it. Anything that involved technology was more expensive back then in inflation adjusted dollars, sometimes exponentially so. Appliances, phones, etc.

Honestly, I haven't found anything I've looked at that was significantly cheaper back then. A few things are marginally less expensive and a lot of things that were way more expensive.

So are you going to answer those questions I asked so we can determine whether you're living beyond your means?
Posted by BuzzdLightBeer
Member since Dec 2018
241 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:50 pm to
"O.k., idiot, here we go.

Let's take the article you just quoted. That $177,788 that houses are "supposed" to be?

If interest rates were what they were when many of us or our parents bought houses, here's how that would break down on that $177,788.

30 year mortgage, principal paid would be $177,788.

Interest would be $456,034.96.

For a total of $633,822.96.

If you take a house for $450,000 at today's interest rates and run the numbers according to average interest rates for the past five years, you get this:

Principal paid: $450,000
Interest paid: $309,469.34

For a total of $759,469.34

The second scenario is higher, yes. By 16%.

You're telling me that the total cost of home ownership being 16% higher now vs 1980 is why people "can't live" and are completely incapable of buying homes?

If so, one of us is so stupid that it's amazing that we can pull up our pants after taking a dump, but it's not me.

There are a dozen ways of dealing with a 16% gap."





In 1980 the average home price was $47,200 compared to $301,000 today

The home price to median household income ratio was 4.86 at its height in the 80s compared to 7.76 as of June 30, 2022.
This post was edited on 9/5/23 at 3:51 pm
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13430 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

In 1980 the average home price was $47,200 compared to $301,000 today

The home price to median household income ratio was 4.86 at its height in the 80s compared to 7.76 as of June 30, 2022.


Great.

And the interest rate in 1981 was 16.63 percent.

And the average house size in 1980 was 47% less than the average house size now.

So what is the average price today for a house that is 47% smaller than the average sized house of today that goes for $301,000? When we know that, we can compare apples and apples.

You dummies who want to make this about a one number comparison, surely you don't live your lives that way, do you?
This post was edited on 9/5/23 at 4:02 pm
Posted by LARancher1991
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2015
2245 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 4:06 pm to
Sure, first I need a truck as what I do for a living requires it. As far as the house I have a wife and kids so any other option would be just as expensive in rent or not feasible based on size of the house. As far as hobbies: hunting doesn't really cost that much being that I mostly hunt public land so don't spend as much money on it as some do. I guess I can sell my boat and give up fishing so I will concede that to you. Let's say I give up the few other small hobbies I enjoy. Yea, I guess that would leave a little more money at the end of each month, and that's fine if the mindset is work until I retire and hope my knees are still good and my pecker still works so I can finally enjoy life when I do. But I'll be honest doesn't really seem like living to me.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13430 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 4:09 pm to
And btw, the link I looked at said the average home price in 1980 was $68,700.

The inflation calculator I used said that $68,700 in 1980 was worth $254,000 in 2023.

When you factor in that the average home size in 1980 was 47% smaller than it is now, those numbers suggest that you get more house for your money now than you did then.

Of course, lot sizes were a lot bigger back then on average—so you were paying for the land as well as the house, not as much so now, at least for new houses, but that's why you can't just distill this down to one or two numbers. It's a lot more complicated.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97972 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 4:12 pm to
Stonehog just got destroyed
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138826 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Housing prices outpacing inflation by 150% has nothing to do with affordability?
Apparently not for Gen-X or Gen-Z.

Are you a Gen-Y?
If so, you're doing your fellow millennials no favors as you're unfortunately stereotypical.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38343 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Great.

And the interest rate in 1981 was 16.63 percent.

And the average house size in 1980 was 47% less than the average house size now.

My first house that I mentioned above was in Mobile. But it was 1980 and we got bond money at 11.5%. It was new. It was a 3/1. Had a "great room" which was a new concept back then. None of the houses in this neighborhood had a garage. Paved driveway, not concrete. No garage - we didn't know what we were missing because had been in apartments. I am thinking it was $65k +/- and I'm guess here, 1600 sq ft. But, we were thrilled as we had a baby a couple of months out.
Posted by LARancher1991
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2015
2245 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 4:16 pm to
I'll give you another example my uncle is a dairy farmer. My grandpa started the dairy when he got back from the war. Milked 80-120 head of cows twice a day. Made a decent living and was even able to put away money to retire on. My uncle runs the dairy now milking the same amount of cows and can barely make ends meet. Why is that?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138826 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

Stonehog just got destroyed
It's a sequel of the sequel of the sequel of the sequel of the sequel in this thread.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13430 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

Sure, first I need a truck as what I do for a living requires it. As far as the house I have a wife and kids so any other option would be just as expensive in rent or not feasible based on size of the house. As far as hobbies: hunting doesn't really cost that much being that I mostly hunt public land so don't spend as much money on it as some do. I guess I can sell my boat and give up fishing so I will concede that to you. Let's say I give up the few other small hobbies I enjoy. Yea, I guess that would leave a little more money at the end of each month, and that's fine if the mindset is work until I retire and hope my knees are still good and my pecker still works so I can finally enjoy life when I do. But I'll be honest doesn't really seem like living to me.


I notice that you are only appearing to answer the questions while actually not answering them.

What did your truck cost? What did your house cost? What are your payments/mortgage? How many guns do you own and what is their approximate value?

quote:

But I'll be honest doesn't really seem like living to me.


And if we do get to the bottom of these answers, I'll bet a shiny nickel that that statement ends up being the crux of the biscuit.

Again, my parents didn't evaluate the value of living that way. If you could afford a boat, you bought one and were happy about it. If you couldn't, you didn't, and you didn't conclude that life wasn't worth living because you couldn't afford a boat.

If you really wanted one and couldn't afford one you worked another job so that you could afford one. But most people just didn't buy one if they couldn't afford it.

But advertising and the influence of media has changed people's mindsets drastically since my parents bought their first house in 1980. Yeah, they rented until then. Got married in 1963 but didn't buy a house until 1980.

People used to simply not buy things they couldn't afford. But people have become programmed think that they deserve to have exactly what they want. Not just a truck, but the exact truck they want. Not just a house, but the exact house they want.

Despite the pig dullard parroting the clickbait articles (which again, is where this mindset comes from in the first place) when you consider all aspects of affordability, it really isn't much more expensive now than it was back then.

The much bigger difference is people's mindsets and feelings of consumer entitlement.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13430 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

I'll give you another example my uncle is a dairy farmer. My grandpa started the dairy when he got back from the war. Milked 80-120 head of cows twice a day. Made a decent living and was even able to put away money to retire on. My uncle runs the dairy now milking the same amount of cows and can barely make ends meet. Why is that?


I'm guessing the profitability of that industry has changed since technology has made it so much more efficient for large corporations to take over farming. I'm guessing that they can produce a lot more milk in a lot shorter period of time and drive prices down. Which again, is why prices are NOT higher than they used to be. Milk obtained by hand is a lot more labor intensive than milk obtained by machines.

There's not much profit in selling horses and buggies or ditto machines any more either.

Was that really a head-scratcher for you?

This post was edited on 9/5/23 at 4:36 pm
Posted by LARancher1991
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2015
2245 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 4:24 pm to
Well hell I hate to say it but ya got me there.
first pageprev pagePage 22 of 25Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram