0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: House Panel Finds No Evidence Linking Trump to Epstein Crimes
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:35 pm to Boodis Man
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:35 pm to Boodis Man
quote:
the main accusation against trump was that he was protecting his pedo friends and trying to deflect media coverage of the scandal which he campaigned on
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:40 pm to BoarEd
Dems called the investigation incomplete because of the lack of PUBLIC HEARINGS.
This tells you their motivation isn't justice.
They need idiot voters to see them trashing President Trump and have the lying media keep this in the eyes of the nation so they can push to 'Peach Foty Seben'
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:41 pm to BoarEd
it's interesting that the Epstein files are all about Trump to so many people `
`
`
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:44 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Right. Trump being chummy with Epstein isn't news
There are a lot of other people in the files. I can't fathom that they're all innocent.
There are a lot of other people in the files. I can't fathom that they're all innocent.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:45 pm to BoarEd
Thank God!
If Comer wants a statue outside the Lincoln memorial he would totally get one.
If Comer wants a statue outside the Lincoln memorial he would totally get one.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:49 pm to Powerman
tbh for me, it's about revealing what he was actually "up to" as opposed to identifying specific wealthy sex pests and white collar criminals
what his goals were, if there were any other than money & social status, are still a big question
what his goals were, if there were any other than money & social status, are still a big question
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:50 pm to BoarEd
Massholes :rotflmao
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:52 pm to BoarEd
quote:
I'm sure this will be upsetting to those who still want to believe
Probably.
Personally, I've always been in the camp that believes Trump really had no illicit dealings whatsoever with Epstein. But the passage of time and some of the revelations are somewhat indicative that some of Trump's former and current buddies (hello, Bannon) are on that list and Trump is covering for them.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:54 pm to TigerAxeOK
Trump dropped Bannon. There was this whole thing the last 6 plus years that Bannon had his show to help Trump while Trump never acknowledged him while he was grifting.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:57 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
tbh for me, it's about revealing what he was actually "up to" as opposed to identifying specific wealthy sex pests and white collar criminals
what his goals were, if there were any other than money & social status, are still a big question
Correct. Who he was working for/with and what other people were wrapped up in things would be more interesting.
The business and intelligence connections are probably much more revealing than any of the sex stuff.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 10:16 pm to BoarEd
Hate to piss on your parade, but a committee that failed to interview most of the victims clears him of nothing. That would be like going to the furniture store and when you get home, you told your wife the store was out of milk. I’m not saying he is guilty, but to say he is free of any guilt without interviewing relevant witnesses is absurd.
I’m pretty sure this is the same committee that had “the goods” on Biden for impeachment, yet he was never impeached.
Nope - not a liberal. Just being objective.
I’m pretty sure this is the same committee that had “the goods” on Biden for impeachment, yet he was never impeached.
Nope - not a liberal. Just being objective.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 10:18 pm to DeBoar
quote:
Massie taking more losses
Posted on 11/10/26 at 10:19 pm to DrKnievel
quote:
Hate to piss on your parade, but a committee that failed to interview most of the victims clears him of nothing. That would be like going to the furniture store and when you get home, you told your wife the store was out of milk. I’m not saying he is guilty, but to say he is free of any guilt without interviewing relevant witnesses is absurd.
I’m pretty sure this is the same committee that had “the goods” on Biden for impeachment, yet he was never impeached.
Nope - not a liberal. Just being objective.
It is sort of funny that there are numerous people that share the sentiment that the republican house and senate were functionally useless
But in this instance they're the final authority on truth
Posted on 11/10/26 at 10:25 pm to BoarEd
Why not release that anytime in the last 2 years? Why now? Why the delay? Only low iq people would fall for this nonsense. All bullshite. Reps trying to save face and it’s pathetically too obvious.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 10:27 pm to Boomer65
quote:
Only low iq people would fall for this nonsens
Take a look at who started the thread
This dude is a Q tard who thinks he has some special knowledge of AI and all sorts of other crazy shite. He's easily the dumbest person here.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 10:28 pm to Powerman
quote:
It is sort of funny that there are numerous people that share the sentiment that the republican house and senate were functionally useless
But in this instance they're the final authority on truth
Did you read what I wrote? I’ll use an analogy. Let’s say you commit a crime in Louisiana and I ask everyone in Texas whether you did it or not. Nobody in Texas has seen a thing. That doesn’t make you innocent. I was just asking the wrong people.
You may take it as the truth but objective people see through the propaganda.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 10:58 pm to DrKnievel
quote:
Did you read what I wrote?
I'm not convinced that person can actually read.
As to your post directed towards me, what is it you take issue with in what I said exactly? Can YOU read?
This post was edited on 11/10/26 at 11:00 pm
Posted on 11/10/26 at 11:25 pm to BoarEd
quote:
I'm not convinced that person can actually read.
As to your post directed towards me, what is it you take issue with in what I said exactly? Can YOU read?
I don’t know - maybe the “House Panel Finds No Evidence Linking Trump to Epstein Crimes” is a bit misleading based on what I wrote???
Posted on 11/10/26 at 11:36 pm to DrKnievel
I was actually agreeing with you
It's not a particularly useful piece of information
"We've investigated ourselves and found no wrong doing"
It's not a particularly useful piece of information
"We've investigated ourselves and found no wrong doing"
Posted on 11/10/26 at 11:41 pm to DrKnievel
What's misleading about it? It's true. Donald Trump was not on trial, was he? The committee was investigating the government's handling of the case. If you hadn't had people like that cocksucker Leiu, or whatever his name is, saying in public that there is evidence of Trump raping 13 year old girls in the file the committee wouldn't have said anything about Trump at all as it wasn't even really the scope of their investigation.
So no, I'm not saying that this "clears" Trump, as he was not on trial. But what I am saying is that, for their part, they haven't found anything that would lead them to refer him to the DoJ for potential prosecution. They did, however, give the DoJ names of people that they feel SHOULD be looked at again. So that is good news.
But the folks who think that this ensnares Trump somehow are just gonna have to keep holding on to that feeling, I guess.
So no, I'm not saying that this "clears" Trump, as he was not on trial. But what I am saying is that, for their part, they haven't found anything that would lead them to refer him to the DoJ for potential prosecution. They did, however, give the DoJ names of people that they feel SHOULD be looked at again. So that is good news.
But the folks who think that this ensnares Trump somehow are just gonna have to keep holding on to that feeling, I guess.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News