re: House Panel Finds No Evidence Linking Trump to Epstein Crimes

quote:

---

What's misleading about it? It's true.

---

What’s misleading about it is that it is true but doesn’t tell the whole story.

quote:

---

Donald Trump was not on trial, was he? The committee was investigating the government's handling of the case. If you hadn't had people like that cocksucker Leiu, or whatever his name is, saying in public that there is evidence of Trump raping 13 year old girls in the file the committee wouldn't have said anything about Trump at all as it wasn't even really the scope of their investigation.

---

The evidence you are referring to can be seen by congress, but hasn’t been released yet by the DOJ. According to the law, they should have been released, yet they were not. I’m not saying the evidence is conclusive. She could be telling the truth or she can be lying, but it’s evidence none the less.

quote:

---

So no, I'm not saying that this "clears" Trump, as he was not on trial. But what I am saying is that, for their part, they haven't found anything that would lead them to refer him to the DoJ for potential prosecution. They did, however, give the DoJ names of people that they feel SHOULD be looked at again. So that is good news.

---

If you only took 25% of a test, would you expect to score 100%? That is what you are trying to do here. Again, I’m not saying he is guilty of Epstein crimes. I’m just saying there isn’t enough data to determine one way or the other. Nobody should be thinking this absolves him of anything and nobody should think this makes him guilty either (although not releasing documents that should have been does look shady).