- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: House Oversight Report Concludes Biden Was Not in Charge of White House/Autopenned Pardons
Posted on 10/28/25 at 10:38 am to VoxDawg
Posted on 10/28/25 at 10:38 am to VoxDawg
Can the Oversight Committee deem executive action "null and void?" Does this lead to arrest? Does this revoke any executive orders or regulations promulgated from 2021-2025?
I hope, really really hope that something comes of this, but until I see some tangible consequences this is Michael Scott screaming "bankruptcy."
I hope, really really hope that something comes of this, but until I see some tangible consequences this is Michael Scott screaming "bankruptcy."
Posted on 10/28/25 at 10:41 am to VoxDawg
quote:
If they conclusively prove that the Autopen pardons are invalid (which I believe will happen)
How can that be possible? I hope it is possible, but I cannot think of how it could be done.
One way is to prove that someone fraudulently signed a pardon without Biden's knowledge. Hasn't Biden said he approved all of the pardons? If he has already said that, then that would make any proof of fraud even harder than it already is. Basically impossible.
The incapacitated argument will not fly. There would have to have been some formal move asserting the President's inability to make decisions before the pardons were signed for that to have any possible effect on the legitimacy of any decisions he made.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 10:42 am to lionward2014
quote:
until I see some tangible consequences this is Michael Scott screaming "bankruptcy."
We ALL know they covered up the fact that Biden wasn't acting as president. I STILL haven't seen any evidence of WHO authorized which pardons.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 10:45 am to JimEverett
Eh. Biden is on record saying he was told what to do and followed his orders. He said words to this effect many times. There's no telling what leverage they used on him. The president was compromised. By multiple foreign governments for starters. No telling how many other ways he was compromised by people here at home.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 10:53 am to AlterEd
quote:
Biden is on record saying he was told what to do and followed his orders.
I have never seen that.
I have seen where he asserts that he approved a set of criteria for pardons and that he autorized pardons that met that criteria. No way a Court will overturn a pardon if he is asserting that. LINK
Posted on 10/28/25 at 10:57 am to JimEverett
quote:
I have never seen that.
Just ask Grok or your AI of choice. A quick search netted at least 10 different times he has intimated that he follows orders from other people.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 10:59 am to AlterEd
Nah - all I could find on the pardons is what I posted.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:00 am to JimEverett
You're not getting my point. If the man is in cognitive decline, has a history of telling people he follows orders from other people, and is proven not to have signed his own orders, how can they be upheld? He wasn't in charge. By his own admission.
quote:
The one thing I thought when I got to be President? That I would get to give orders. But I take more orders than I ever did.
-Joe Biden
This post was edited on 10/28/25 at 11:06 am
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:06 am to VoxDawg
quote:the hot take would be saying someone is getting perp walked, which DOJ is oh for.
so it's highly unlikely that your freezing hot take will be worth it.
Betting lines should be way in the favor on nothing will happen
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:11 am to JimEverett
quote:
There would have to have been some formal move asserting the President's inability to make decisions before the pardons were signed for that to have any possible effect on the legitimacy of any decisions he made.
That's an outstanding argument in a vacuum but doesn't consider that those who the Constitution would look to do the right thing in light of the 25th Amendment aren't abject criminals and the beneficiaries of the fraud.
Everyone loves to tout the 25A in this matter but nobody has an answer for what happens when the folks who must trigger it are letting FauxTUS stay asleep at the wheel and profiting mightily as it carries on.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:12 am to AlterEd
quote:
By his own admission.
He says he authorized the pardons.
He can, of course, change that statement if Republicans push this and eventually force him to testify.
Having said that - I get where you are going and you are right - Biden was incompetent/incapable of making decisions/etc. So, I guess there is a chance to overturn the pardons if you can prove incapacity or whatever. But i am not even sure it is possible to do that. Seems the only route would have been an Amendment 25 thing. Anyone know?
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:14 am to SuperSaint
quote:
Betting lines should be way in the favor on nothing will happen
And they're right - for now.
Nothing is happening... until it does. The question is a matter of who sees the patterns as they develop to chart where this is going, and who wants to retire to the safety of the boo-bird nest so they don't have to risk being wrong?
This post was edited on 10/28/25 at 11:15 am
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:16 am to JimEverett
I believe there is some computer login credentials that can be tracked, while using the autopen but not sure. Everyone probably had Bidens login and passwords anyway. Anywhoo, supposedly safeguards are embedded with the autopen to eliminate these types of shenanigans, but if everyone is shady, they can be worked around I'm sure.
Sigh
Sigh
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:16 am to AlterEd
quote:
Eh. Biden is on record saying he was told what to do and followed his orders. He said words to this effect many times.
The craziest thing about his presidency is the fact that he said something to this effect ALL THE TIME and we had a press that never once asked him, "well, Mr. President, who exactly is it who is telling you what to do?"
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:18 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
we had a press that never once asked him, "well, Mr. President, who exactly is it who is telling you what to do?"
Which obviously was a feature, not a bug.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:19 am to VoxDawg
quote:
That's an outstanding argument in a vacuum but doesn't consider that those who the Constitution would look to do the right thing in light of the 25th Amendment aren't abject criminals and the beneficiaries of the fraud.
Everyone loves to tout the 25A in this matter but nobody has an answer for what happens when the folks who must trigger it are letting FauxTUS stay asleep at the wheel and profiting mightily as it carries on.
What other mechanism is there in invalidating presidential action due to incapacity outside of the 25th amendment?
Does any U.S. citizen have that ability? Are we going to let every leftist in America to file a lawsuit contesting Trump's competency?
I like what the House Committee did - all of this stuff needs to be put on record. I am just highly skeptical that pardons/executive orders/etc will be overturned.
But it will be interesting if someone tries to do so.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:30 am to VoxDawg
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:30 am to JimEverett
The man was on record saying that he follows other people's orders and says what other people tell him to say. I don't give a shite what he says about approving the pardons. By his own admission he just does and says what other people tell him to do and say. There's no way those executive actions can be upheld. He wasn't the chief executive. Period.
Also, can a person be held to the terms of a contract that they signed while under coercion or while intoxicated? Being mentally impaired is no different.
Also, can a person be held to the terms of a contract that they signed while under coercion or while intoxicated? Being mentally impaired is no different.
This post was edited on 10/28/25 at 11:33 am
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:41 am to VoxDawg
SHOULD be the biggest political scandal in the history of this country, next to Lyndon Johnson and the CIA murdering a popular sitting U.S. President...
But it will be completely ignored by the mainstream media.
But it will be completely ignored by the mainstream media.
Popular
Back to top



2








