- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: House Judiciary Committee Open Hearing 10AM EST
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:18 am to DavidTheGnome
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:18 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
The other thing, There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me.
Yeah, sounds horrible to me too. Sounds corrupt as corrupt gets. And Biden's own words give the reasonable suspicion necessary to take it a step further with investigation.
Is there any evidence that you can point to that proves otherwise, i.e. that Trump would suggest this for "personal benefit" when there is clear reason to instead suspect potential corruption?
Evidence of personal benefit motivation? Other than just theories and opinions of course?
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:18 am to cajunangelle
"I will start out by saying my name is Sheila Jackson Lee"
No fricking shite.
When she's the face Dems put in front of the cameras, we are winning.
No fricking shite.
When she's the face Dems put in front of the cameras, we are winning.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:19 am to GumboPot
Sheila Jax Lee speaking to media: this is somber blah blah blah the rule of law...
The constitutional professors said fear kings peach foety five.
The constitutional professors said fear kings peach foety five.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:19 am to GumboPot
Chris Wallace actually calling out the BS regarding turley and how biased these progfessors are
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:20 am to arseinclarse
I remember that report that came out saying her aides have a high turnover in employment she is such a bitch.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:21 am to cajunangelle
quote:
. I tweeted oversight GOP that tweets out on this along with Biggs, Collins, JJ and Ratcliffe to get an aide to get the Biden clip -admitting bribery quid pro quo- to show.
Same
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:21 am to LosLobos111
quote:
Chris Wallace actually calling out the BS regarding turley and how biased these progfessors are
Dang, when you lose Wallace you lose everyone.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:23 am to GumboPot
quote:
Not because of political personal reasons.
Of course.
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 11:24 am
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:24 am to DavidTheGnome
Your TDS thong is showing.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:24 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Of course.
Do you have evidence Trump did this for personal gain? Or that he used the aid money to force the Ukrainian president to look in to Biden?
Not opinions, not hearsay, not conjecture. Factual evidence.
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 11:26 am
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:24 am to DavidTheGnome
You haven't been paying attention, by your own admission, so how would you have any input or opinion?
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:24 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Should the president be the one seeking that out against his political rivals
This didn't happen.
Wasn't the investigation already going on?
Can anyone point out where Trump said, when asking for a favor, until that is done, financing will be held up?? Without that the whole shtick falls apart imo.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:25 am to davyjones
That’s perfect
Davidthewhaletail
Davidthewhaletail
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 11:26 am
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:28 am to lsuguy84
He asked if I watched the hearings, I haven’t. I did read the transcript of the call though. It seemed pretty straightforward that a president asking the leader of a foreign nation to look into a political rival. That shouldn’t be ok to anybody no matter which political direction they lean.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:29 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
It seemed pretty straightforward that a president asking the leader of a foreign nation to look into a political rival.
But that is all the proof you have.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:29 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
It seemed pretty straightforward that a president asking the leader of a foreign nation to look into a political rival.
No, it's not.
Again, if you actually watched the hearings you'd know this.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:29 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
It seemed pretty straightforward that a president asking the leader of a foreign nation to look into a political rival.
Again, this didn't happen
Popular
Back to top


0











