Started By
Message

re: House Judiciary Committee Open Hearing 10AM EST

Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:18 am to
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36737 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:18 am to
quote:

The other thing, There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me.

Yeah, sounds horrible to me too. Sounds corrupt as corrupt gets. And Biden's own words give the reasonable suspicion necessary to take it a step further with investigation.

Is there any evidence that you can point to that proves otherwise, i.e. that Trump would suggest this for "personal benefit" when there is clear reason to instead suspect potential corruption?

Evidence of personal benefit motivation? Other than just theories and opinions of course?
Posted by arseinclarse
Member since Apr 2007
35423 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:18 am to
"I will start out by saying my name is Sheila Jackson Lee"




No fricking shite.

When she's the face Dems put in front of the cameras, we are winning.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167281 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:19 am to
Sheila Jax Lee speaking to media: this is somber blah blah blah the rule of law...

The constitutional professors said fear kings peach foety five.
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:19 am to
Chris Wallace actually calling out the BS regarding turley and how biased these progfessors are

Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167281 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:20 am to
I remember that report that came out saying her aides have a high turnover in employment she is such a bitch.
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14977 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:20 am to
That says it all
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
77595 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:21 am to
quote:

. I tweeted oversight GOP that tweets out on this along with Biggs, Collins, JJ and Ratcliffe to get an aide to get the Biden clip -admitting bribery quid pro quo- to show.



Same
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Chris Wallace actually calling out the BS regarding turley and how biased these progfessors are


Dang, when you lose Wallace you lose everyone.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31528 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Not because of political personal reasons.



Of course.
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 11:24 am
Posted by lsuguy84
Madisonville
Member since Feb 2009
27323 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:23 am to
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
157757 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:24 am to
Your TDS thong is showing.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45929 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Of course.


Do you have evidence Trump did this for personal gain? Or that he used the aid money to force the Ukrainian president to look in to Biden?

Not opinions, not hearsay, not conjecture. Factual evidence.

This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 11:26 am
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36737 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:24 am to
TDS whale tail
Posted by lsuguy84
Madisonville
Member since Feb 2009
27323 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:24 am to
You haven't been paying attention, by your own admission, so how would you have any input or opinion?
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Should the president be the one seeking that out against his political rivals


This didn't happen.
Wasn't the investigation already going on?
Can anyone point out where Trump said, when asking for a favor, until that is done, financing will be held up?? Without that the whole shtick falls apart imo.
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
157757 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:25 am to
That’s perfect

Davidthewhaletail
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 11:26 am
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31528 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:28 am to
He asked if I watched the hearings, I haven’t. I did read the transcript of the call though. It seemed pretty straightforward that a president asking the leader of a foreign nation to look into a political rival. That shouldn’t be ok to anybody no matter which political direction they lean.
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
15074 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:29 am to
quote:

It seemed pretty straightforward that a president asking the leader of a foreign nation to look into a political rival.


But that is all the proof you have.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45929 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:29 am to
quote:

It seemed pretty straightforward that a president asking the leader of a foreign nation to look into a political rival.


No, it's not.

Again, if you actually watched the hearings you'd know this.

Posted by lsuguy84
Madisonville
Member since Feb 2009
27323 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:29 am to
quote:

 It seemed pretty straightforward that a president asking the leader of a foreign nation to look into a political rival.


Again, this didn't happen
Jump to page
Page First 19 20 21 22 23 ... 50
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 21 of 50Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram