Started By
Message

re: House Democrat plans to file a constitutional amendment to invalidate Supreme Court ruling

Posted on 7/2/24 at 7:48 am to
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
47138 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 7:48 am to

Begging for campaign donations, nothing more.
Posted by Pezzo
Member since Aug 2020
3006 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 7:48 am to
I'd like to see that used against Obama
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62079 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 7:48 am to
What’s the point in having a SC if congress can simply reverse all their rulings?
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37323 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 7:49 am to
quote:

amendment

Which we’ll never have again. At least not in the foreseeable future.

I’d also argue that judicial rulings on official v non official acts and the resulting appeal decisions will provide more clarity on the issue.
Posted by tigerpawl
Can't get there from here.
Member since Dec 2003
22628 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 7:50 am to
Typical Grandstanding.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37323 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 7:50 am to
quote:

What’s the point in having a SC if congress can simply reverse all their rulings?

Congress has always had that power, and rightfully so. SCOTUS’s job is interpreting the law. Congress can change it via legislation or amendments.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
68441 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 7:56 am to
Seems like an attack on democracy and America
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
18028 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 7:57 am to
I’m sick of these people talking about democracy,,it’s not about our democracy, it’s their democracy, every last one of their ploys has backfired, the talking points that they have spread thru the media and thru leftist world is biting them in the arse.

They’re all a bunch of frickin losers EVERY last one of em and their day of reckoning will come and they know it. I frickIN LOVE THE MELT DOWN
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62079 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 7:58 am to

quote:

Congress has always had that power, and rightfully so. SCOTUS’s job is interpreting the law. Congress can change it via legislation or amendments.





Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476737 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 7:58 am to
quote:

What’s the point in having a SC if congress can simply reverse all their rulings?


Are you asking why we can amend our Constitution?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476737 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 7:58 am to
quote:

House Democrat plans to file a constitutional amendment to invalidate Supreme Court ruling
Posted by MikkUGA
Destin
Member since Jun 2014
2971 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 8:01 am to
They do not have the votes. This has zero chance of going anywhere.
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
29896 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 8:02 am to
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
25454 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 8:04 am to
quote:

Do these idiots not realize that both Obama and Biden will be going to jail if SCOTUS said otherwise?



No they won't. However I can guarantee that every Republican POTUS would be prosecuted if Dems had their way. GOP doesn't do stuff like that because they're "above it" or whatever bullshite they float out.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62079 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 8:06 am to

quote:

House Democrat plans to file a constitutional amendment to invalidate Supreme Court ruling





“Congress' regulatory authority over the Court is not unlimited. For example, it cannot dictate case outcomes or mandate the use of particular interpretive methodologies, such as originalism or living constitutionalism. Doing so would usurp the core of "The judicial Power of the United States," which Article III says is vested in the Supreme Court and lower federal courts, not in the legislative branch. If "judicial power" has any meaning at all, it includes the power to decide cases independently, without coercion by other branches of government.”
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476737 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 8:08 am to
quote:

“Congress' regulatory authority over the Court is not unlimited. For example, it cannot dictate case outcomes or mandate the use of particular interpretive methodologies, such as originalism or living constitutionalism. Doing so would usurp the core of "The judicial Power of the United States," which Article III says is vested in the Supreme Court and lower federal courts, not in the legislative branch. If "judicial power" has any meaning at all, it includes the power to decide cases independently, without coercion by other branches of government.”


Do you understand what a Constitutional Amendment is?

It changes the Constitution, which means if they were able to complete the process, the Supreme Court would be bound by the new version of the Constitution.

Also, for more 1st grade civics, more than the House would need to be involved to finalize this process.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 8:08 am to
quote:



Democratic New York Rep. Joe Morelle announced Monday that he will file a constitutional amendment that will virtually invalidate the Supreme Court's recent ruling on presidential immunity.



Fine.

Now he just needs to convince 2/3rds of the Senate and 3/4ths of the state legislatures.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13480 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 8:10 am to
The headline might as well be, "Democratic lawmaker proposes something that will never happen in order to get his name out there on social media."
This post was edited on 7/2/24 at 8:11 am
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
10220 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 8:10 am to
quote:

“Congress' regulatory authority over the Court is not unlimited.
. So your argument is that if a constitutional amendment was passed by 2/3 of the house 2/3 of the senate, and ratified by 3/4 of the states that it would be unconstitutional?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 7/2/24 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Do you understand what a Constitutional Amendment is?


The way the tweet in the OP reads, apparently most people don't.

The level of civics education I use to debate/discuss on this board is 8th grade level. At least have that level of civics education as a baseline for a U.S. citizen.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram