- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/9/22 at 2:28 pm to the808bass
I'm sorry that your strenuous efforts to lie only work on some people. Try harder?
Posted on 1/9/22 at 2:29 pm to BamaAtl
I’m sorry that you’re still pretending to be a doctor.
Posted on 1/9/22 at 2:31 pm to the808bass
One day you'll accept that your being wrong doesn't lessen when you add more errors on top.
Appears today is not that day, however.
Appears today is not that day, however.
Posted on 1/9/22 at 2:31 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
You don’t even bother to look at the analysis.
The analysis is junk. All it shows is that deaths and cases went up when Delta hit which just happened to be later in time than when vaccinations began. It was also after Trump was kicked off social media. This study’s methodology would conclude that caused COVID deaths to increase worldwide. It was also caused by LSU hiring Kim Mulkey, Tom Brady winning another Super Bowl, Rush Limbaugh’s death, etc.
This post was edited on 1/9/22 at 2:31 pm
Posted on 1/9/22 at 2:32 pm to BamaAtl
I’m not wrong about you not being a medical doctor.
Posted on 1/9/22 at 2:37 pm to the808bass
quote:
I’m not wrong about you not being a medical doctor
So does that mean you are discounting this analysis because it was performed by a poli sci grad student?
Posted on 1/9/22 at 2:40 pm to MikeTheTiger71
No. Nor am I discounting that you’re a dumbfrick. They’re all independent facts.
Posted on 1/9/22 at 2:40 pm to MikeTheTiger71
That wasn’t my point. My point was the immediate jump to discredit someone without even looking at the analysis. It happens way too much
Posted on 1/9/22 at 2:41 pm to MikeTheTiger71
Which study informed your opinion on the vaccine? I’m triple vaxxed because the several medical doctors in my family told me to and I trust them. I’d like to see what other people relied upon when making their decision.
Posted on 1/9/22 at 2:46 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
nutbag promoting ivermectin, so...
You just destroyed your credibility.
Posted on 1/9/22 at 3:10 pm to the808bass
quote:
No. Nor am I discounting that you’re a dumbfrick. They’re all independent facts.
So why does he need to be a medical doctor to criticize an analysis by a poli sci grad student?
Posted on 1/9/22 at 3:15 pm to MikeTheTiger71
He does this every time he doesn't like being told he's wrong. It's a pattern.
Posted on 1/9/22 at 3:15 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
That wasn’t my point. My point was the immediate jump to discredit someone without even looking at the analysis. It happens way too much
I agree that credentials should neither qualify nor disqualify an analysis from consideration, but the lack of credentials lowers the bar for critique. In this case, it helps explain why the analysis is so bad. That said, well credentialed individuals can still produce junk and people without credentials can still provide solid analysis. At the end of the day the study does need to stand or fall on its own merits.
Posted on 1/9/22 at 3:24 pm to MikeTheTiger71
For sake of argument did all those critiquing the analysis review each linked study? Were they all as seriously flawed as you believe the writers analysis to be?
Thanks. I’m curious how much work was put in on this
Thanks. I’m curious how much work was put in on this
Posted on 1/9/22 at 3:32 pm to omegaman66
quote:
nutbag promoting ivermectin, so...
You just destroyed your credibility.
Him being the special ed version of fuqtardias village idiot he has no credibility.
[url=LINK ]
[/url]Posted on 1/9/22 at 3:41 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Which study informed your opinion on the vaccine? I’m triple vaxxed because the several medical doctors in my family told me to and I trust them. I’d like to see what other people relied upon when making their decision.
I did not study the safety and efficacy trials in detail, but I read summaries of the results from both proponents and detractors. I found the arguments against the vaccine mostly uncompelling for me personally, though I have chosen not to vaccinate my children. The cost-benefit analysis is strong for adults, not so much for children. Statistics on the risks of the virus itself are a big part of the equation. The significant and dramatic reduction in cases and deaths in the early rollout prior to Delta made a strong case for vaccination of adults.
None of that means I support mandates. At this point with Omicron, the value is almost entirely protecting the individual from serious diseases. There’s very little population benefit and certainly not enough to justify government intervention.
Posted on 1/9/22 at 3:43 pm to Lawyered
The SWAMP is alive and well....
Posted on 1/9/22 at 3:50 pm to dafif
quote:
For sake of argument did all those critiquing the analysis review each linked study? Were they all as seriously flawed as you believe the writers analysis to be?
Thanks. I’m curious how much work was put in on this
I haven’t reviewed the other studies at this point. The article was focused on the one multi-national data analysis. The fact that the author found that junk study credible leads me to the conclusion that he is either misinterpreting the results of the other studies or they are similarly flawed. Given the author made no attempt to summarize those studies, there really wasn’t anything specific to critique.
Posted on 1/9/22 at 3:51 pm to MikeTheTiger71
Thanks for the reply. 
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News