- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:23 am to SlowFlowPro
You can stop with the petty insults.
Well what is that magical point for you? It's really not subjective at all. Allowing for that nuance is part of the problem and it's exactly how we ended up with third trimester and post-birth abortions.
That's like saying we shouldn't focus on crime or "criminal justice"
If abortion is murder (it is) and a huge portion of society openly accepts it, gleefully cheers it on, and believes it is some sort of Constitutional right, then yes, it is a major deal and we should focus on it. It is evil personified.
quote:
There is a point where it is, and a point where it isn't. The entire difficulty with this discussion is finding that point, which, AS I SAID EARLIER, involves an ever-changing scientific standard as well as philosophy (Which can be subjective).
Well what is that magical point for you? It's really not subjective at all. Allowing for that nuance is part of the problem and it's exactly how we ended up with third trimester and post-birth abortions.
quote:
That's why focusing on this as a major political point is stupid. It's an inflammatory discussion point meant to create emotion, which creates polarity, which then promotes giving power to the very people who want people thinking abortion is a major deal. It's manipulation.
That's like saying we shouldn't focus on crime or "criminal justice"
If abortion is murder (it is) and a huge portion of society openly accepts it, gleefully cheers it on, and believes it is some sort of Constitutional right, then yes, it is a major deal and we should focus on it. It is evil personified.
This post was edited on 9/15/22 at 8:25 am
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Household income is irrelevant.
It's irrelevant when a woman with kids lives in the household and you're claiming that it's the #1 factor for a wealth gap? I get that you've latched onto some woke NYTimes article, but are you thinking about what you're claiming? It doesn't sound like it.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
At a certain point, yes. Before that point? No.
And what point is that? Back to Burr’s comment, after conception “the batter is mixed and ready to put in the oven” all that is needed is time to cook.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:27 am to Paddyshack
quote:
You can stop with the petty insults.
The post you're responding to had no insults.
quote:
Well what is that magical point for you?
I don't know. I'm not an expert in the matter and I'm not a woman so I never felt the need to really dig in to a position.
It's perfectly acceptable to say you don't know the answer to incredibly complicated and nuanced issues. People get real emotional about that and demand you take a side. That's a clear sign of manipulation and it's ever-present in the abortion discussion circles.
quote:
That's like saying we shouldn't focus on crime or "criminal justice"
No it's not.
We can define crimes and analyze behaviors within that construct relatively easily. You don't need emotions at all.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:28 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Philosophy can provide morality.
Also you
quote:
philosophy (which becomes very subjective)
Philosophy can provide opinions about morality.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:28 am to burger bearcat
The Christian right is just like the Muslim right. Given the chance, they would force everyone in society to behave as they decreed. We are fortunate to have a strong tendency towards individual rights, which has overcome these religious despots.
You might be right that the secular types (me) can’t eat their cake and still have it (Don’t you think this is a much more intuitive way to say this?) It would be nice to lock in a balance of a moderately religious population of Protestants in a liberal democracy. The trouble is that things are always changing, and the pendulum is always swinging. It just can’t be stopped. If we arrested its swing toward moral dissolution it would swing to puritan oppression.
You might be right that the secular types (me) can’t eat their cake and still have it (Don’t you think this is a much more intuitive way to say this?) It would be nice to lock in a balance of a moderately religious population of Protestants in a liberal democracy. The trouble is that things are always changing, and the pendulum is always swinging. It just can’t be stopped. If we arrested its swing toward moral dissolution it would swing to puritan oppression.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:29 am to SeeeeK
quote:
They tell others how to live, follow these guidelines, they don't even think of living that way.
quote:
My favorite is my neighbor 4 houses down. Loves his Jesus, but only when he's not fricking his side piece.
I'm not sure what point you are trying to make. But you are either being intellectually ignorant or creating some straw man that doesn't exist. No one is saying the behavior you described is considered "Christian" or Biblical. Christians recognize that we are all fallen and sinners.
It's not about thumping the Bible, it's about living your life the best you can through the Gospel. The neighbor you described had failed in that regard despite his cover.
This post was edited on 9/15/22 at 8:30 am
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:29 am to Flats
quote:
It's irrelevant when a woman with kids lives in the household and you're claiming that it's the #1 factor for a wealth gap?
If the wife is staying at home her income is $0, which creates a huge gap with her husband.
quote:
but are you thinking about what you're claiming?
Pregnancy stops advancement in women's careers (sometimes fully). This creates a large income gap with males and women who don't have children.
What is so difficult to understand about that?
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:29 am to Flats
quote:
Philosophy can provide opinions about morality.
Religion is the exact same, then.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm not an expert in the matter and I'm not a woman so I never felt the need to really dig in to a position.
Ah, yes, the ole Kentaji Brown Jackson response.
quote:
No it's not.
We can define crimes and analyze behaviors within that construct relatively easily. You don't need emotions at all.
Abortion is murder.
Murder is a crime.
Abortion is a crime.
You can try to talk circles around it all day long, but for many of us, it's not complicated.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If the wife is staying at home her income is $0, which creates a huge gap with her husband.
quote:
This creates a large income gap
Earlier you claimed wealth, now you're claiming income. And you're not just claiming impact, you claimed it's the #1 factor. So it's more of a factor than, say education. I don't know if you actually believe that, but I sure as hell don't think it's supported by facts.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The Left can only take and brainwash your children in large numbers with public power behind them. The religions extremists can only take and brainwash your children in large numbers with public power behind them. Remove the public power and the polarity subsides and the threat level decreases and personal decisions (like religion) return to the personal.
Excellent post!
And those downvoting it are the religious partisans who would force us onto our knees if we let them gain power.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't know. I'm not an expert in the matter and I'm not a woman so I never felt the need to really dig in to a position.
Like Burr said, the batter is mixed and in the oven and it’s just a matter of time until it is ready. The science is pretty clear.
Is a procedure to kill a 1 week old baby more palpable than a procedure to kill a 32 week old baby bc it does not “look” like a baby yet? In both cases, an unnatural “event” happened to terminate a pregnancy.
This post was edited on 9/15/22 at 8:37 am
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:34 am to burger bearcat
quote:
So even if you, yourself are not a believer and consider yourself non-religous, that is fine. However, you should still want to live in a Chrsitian and Biblical centric society, and respect that tradition and moral standard, because history has shown that Christian/Biblical centric societies are the most prosperous and free countries.
As one of the most outspoken atheists on the board, I don't disagree. I've tempered my opinion on this a bit over the years. While deep down I still think that you don't NEED religion to have a "moral" society because I'm living proof you clearly do not, it's become clear that the VAAAAAAAAAAST majority of the world does, in both the religious and nonreligious camps. Maybe I'm the strangely wired outlier, but it doesn't matter. Without those underpinnings, most people seem to have allowed a misguided belief in "being nice" which is really only being exploited by postmodernist bullshite where there are no truths at all to force them into being so open minded that their brains have fallen out. See: "A woman is anyone who identifies as a woman."
That said, I'm just as wary of the eventual slide into a version of a Christian theocracy if that became the only acceptable viewpoint, because when it had the power in the past to do so, it did. Now, having said that, whatever fears I have of that are miniscule compared to the right in our faces communism which is about to completely wash over America, so to pretend it compares in any way is just dishonest I think which is why I've made a point of actually honoring Chicken's edict which got me banned years ago and NOT taken part is many religious topics here. I have no reason to pick a fight with you guys on this as I find it far more important we work together on the bigger picture at hand issues we're facing.
So yeah...I'd MUCH prefer to deal with an overly American religious society than what we are careening into now...without question.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:35 am to Penrod
quote:.....
who would
quote:
if
Hypotheticals are awesome.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:35 am to Flats
quote:
Earlier you claimed wealth, now you're claiming income
Well they're largely related, but income was the intent. I haven't even had a 2nd cup of coffee.
quote:
So it's more of a factor than, say education.
Look at the data from the article. The gap is bigger in college-educated than non-college educated.
Having children is the big distinction in careers. That's why abortion is such a big topic (especially for urban women, who are more likely to have careers). This is also why women with careers have fewer children and have them later. If you're going to stall your career advancement, it's better to do it in your mid-late 30s when you have advanced some, rather than in your mid-20s when you're at the bottom.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Pregnancy stops advancement in women's careers (sometimes fully). This creates a large income gap with males and women who don't have children. What is so difficult to understand about that?
This is true. The missed point is that in most situations it is the woman’s choice to slow down their career bc of their children.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:37 am to Paddyshack
quote:
God (whether you believe in him or not) doesn't take kindly to a society who openly accepts the murder of children. The evidence is all around us.
No it’s not. There is zero evidence “all around us” of God’s opinion on abortion. I’m against it, because I recoil at the killing of innocent humans. You can call that evidence of God, but it could just as easily be evidence of an evolutionary compulsion. Did God create that evolutionary compulsion? We just don’t know.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:37 am to STEVED00
quote:
Is a procedure to kill a 1 week old baby more palpable than a procedure to kill a 32 week old baby bc it does “look” like a baby yet? In both cases, an unnatural “event” happened to terminate a pregnancy.
The big issue is that 1-week old cell bundles "die" a lot more often naturally than they do at 32-weeks.
I mean hell people are told not to advertise their pregnancies until what, 12 weeks?
Popular
Back to top



1





