- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:06 pm to Powerman
quote:
And using deformities as a justification is literally Nazi level shite. A deformity won't kill a baby. You'd have to proactively murder it post birth. Disgusting.
I will ask again, if this is the rationale, why draw the line at congenital issues?
Strange stuff happening here.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:06 pm to AggieHank86
You guys do all know that I started a thread with the actual author of the bill stating that a perfectly viable baby could be aborted during labor for reasons of mental illness only. Correct? You guys did see that shite right
I get that the way the Democrats like to do it is only talk about the scenario that's a tough call in their eyes
But this bill most certainly allows for killing your baby that could live perfectly fine just because you have mental problems
I get that the way the Democrats like to do it is only talk about the scenario that's a tough call in their eyes
But this bill most certainly allows for killing your baby that could live perfectly fine just because you have mental problems
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:06 pm to keakar
quote:
anyone who thinks that is ok should be shot dead, dont even bother with a process or anything, just end them on the spot with a bullet between the eyes
The slaughter of the innocent
Right out of end of day’s shite here.
The beast is in control of the Democratic Party.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:07 pm to L.A.
I'm a native New Yorker who has lived in Virginia since coming here for law school in 1973. I'm disgusted by the governors of both NY and VA right now.
This post was edited on 1/30/19 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:07 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:My God, son, can you READ?
That doesn't really explain your theory of the preemptive need for such legislation AT THIS TIME. If anything, you would think states wouldn't want to tie their hands if they are really anticipating the SCt sending this "back to the states."
I have said SEVERAL times that I do not see the legislation in question as being necessary. I am simply expressing an opinion as to why statue legislators (who are NOT scholars) might want to enact preemptive legislation.
Let's look at Virginia. Its legislature meets for only sixty days in even-numbered years and for only 30 days in odd-numbered years. If SCOTUS were to issue the (silly) ruling that I hypothesized one day AFTER such a session, Roe-type protections would not be available for the next year or so ... assuming that the legislature would be able to enact them in the next session. A legislator might want to pass legislation NOW (when he thinks he has a chance to do so) rather than risking that possibility.
Let's be clear here. NEITHER the NY nor the VA proposed legislation (one of which has already failed and the other of which has not yet passed) is/was nearly as broad as the hysterical, emotional threads on this Forum would lead one to believe.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:08 pm to L.A.
quote:
The infant would be kept comfortable.
Can we put them in little cages too? I’d like to hear the reeeeeeeee again.
Just little bitty cages.
Tiny baby cages.
While they decide if “it” should live or die.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:08 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Strange stuff happening here
Strange is when I get an onion rings in my order of French fries. This is indefensible and disgusting.
I'm probably choice to an extent and this has me sick to my stomach that we are even entertaining the idea that this should be legal.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:09 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
But this bill most certainly allows for killing your baby that could live perfectly fine just because you have mental problems
But seriously, no bullshite here,
Has any of you EVER met a woman that didn’t have at least some mental problems? Be honest here, all women have mental problems.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:09 pm to Powerman
quote:
And using deformities as a justification is literally Nazi level shite
And don't let them fool you with that deformities shite. The bitch who wrote the Bill straight up said you can abort a perfectly viable baby for mental health reasons only under her bill. And you could do it literally during labor You can't get more clear than that
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:11 pm to AggieHank86
Seems my point went over YOUR head. 'Need' was italicized for a reason, as that was your basic assertion here.
I'm not sure if the thrust of your position here is defending these unfathomable (in both timing and implementation) laws, or just "getting" the board, but your stance seems bizarre either way.
I'm not sure if the thrust of your position here is defending these unfathomable (in both timing and implementation) laws, or just "getting" the board, but your stance seems bizarre either way.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:11 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
And don't let them fool you with that deformities shite. The bitch who wrote the Bill straight up said you can abort a perfectly viable baby for mental health reasons only under her bill. And you could do it literally during labor You can't get more clear than that
They won’t stop til it’s legal to toss a live infant into the river in a sack.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:12 pm to L.A.
quote:
Northam said, alluding to the physician and mother discussing whether the born infant should live or die.
So now they acknowledge a baby is a life..... These are sick people
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:12 pm to Powerman
quote:
probably choice to an extent and this has me sick to my stomach that we are even entertaining the idea that this should be legal
Did you see the link earlier posted by Dan of an article from the journal of medical ethics that argued that if a baby is identified as having problems just after birth that the mother would have chosen to abort had she known that it should be okay to kill the baby!
It literally said that there was no substantial difference between a baby in the womb and a three or four day old baby
Which honestly is always been my argument also but they turned it on its head and made it okay to murder the baby even after it's out.
I remember when liberals used to laugh and say that conservatives were being absurd when we said this kind of shite would end up happening
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:13 pm to L.A.
He is a "moderate" these days.
More likely people who say he is are liars
More likely people who say he is are liars
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:14 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
And don't let them fool you with that deformities shite. The bitch who wrote the Bill straight up said you can abort a perfectly viable baby for mental health reasons only under her bill. And you could do it literally during labor You can't get more clear than that
Any woman that would abort her child during labor should be forced to deliver and immediately have the baby taken out of her custody.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:14 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:And I agreed with you that (in my opinion) there is no actual NEED for legislation of this type. We were discussing why the supporters of this legislation might THINK that there was a "need" for it.
Seems my point went over YOUR head. 'Need' was italicized for a reason, as that was your basic assertion here.
I'm not sure if the thrust of your position here is defending these unfathomable (in both timing and implementation) laws, or just "getting" the board, but your stance seems bizarre either way.
Is the difference too subtle for you?
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:15 pm to gthog61
quote:
He is a "moderate" these days.
More likely people who say he is are liars
Actually if you think about it calling him a moderate should terrify people
I mean if thinking that a live baby laying there on the table is still up there for abortion is moderate what the frick is the liberal position!
Posted on 1/30/19 at 6:16 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I agreed with you that (in my opinion) there is no actual NEED for legislation of this type. We were discussing why the supporters of this legislation might THINK that there was a "need" for it
It is not in my realm of mental capacity to imagine the depraved nature as someone who would think there is a need to write a bill that allows a perfectly healthy baby to be aborted for mental health reason during labor
If you're able to wrap your brain around that goodonya
Page 5 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News