- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Here’s exactly what the upcoming Epstein files will look like!
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:01 am to fairweatherfans
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:01 am to fairweatherfans
Do you understand how utterly stupid you sound because it feels like you don’t? Let’s use your logic and say that Epstein compiled a list of very powerful people who committed illegal sex acts and let’s assume he was killed in prison for compiling said list. Let’s also assume the intelligence community was involved which would mean this greatly predates Trump but let’s also assume he is involved illegally. Do you honestly believe a government would allow that list to be released un redacted and the same people are going to prosecute themselves for crimes they committed? After all that is the endgame for the hysteria, is it not? Let’s take it a step further and assume Israel is involved and Mossad has it’s claws in several key politicians, what motivation would they have to ever cooperate?
1
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:08 am to The Torch
You can’t possibly believe that it’s only the Dems keeping the issue alive. There is no “hoax”. Everytime that word is used it sounds like no one has a mind of their own, and Trump provides the language to use…
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:10 am to fairweatherfans
quote:
Please give me another credible reason for Trump doing all in his power to prevent the release of the Full Epstein Files.
What does the entire Democrat party do as soon as Trump has a public stance on an issue? Almost as a reflex, they take the opposite position. So, if Trump wanted the files kept sealed he should have said “expose them”, as soon as he said keep them sealed the entirety of the left went apeshit demanding their release.
He dug in long enough for them all to be on record demanding their release and then went “who gives a shite?”
I think Trump played the left because he knows if he’s in them and how. Just like last week’s ginned up “scandal” about Trump and a redacted victim he knows.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:38 am to VOR
quote:
Everytime that word is used
HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX HOAX
Posted on 11/19/25 at 6:53 pm to Geekboy
Posted on 11/19/25 at 7:02 pm to fairweatherfans
quote:
Redacted or not I will believe Trump's name was,is, in appearance in the Total Epstein files many many times. Please give me another credible reason for Trump doing all in his power to prevent the release of the Full Epstein Files.
We already know his name is in the files.
77,000 pages have been released.
And Trumps name was all over those emails from democrats talking about him.
There will not be a smoking gun.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 7:08 pm to Kjnstkmn
quote:
“We have learned that certainly Jeffrey Epstein and most likely Ghislaine Maxwell were members of the Israeli Mossad.
Actually we don’t know this.
quote:
in participating in heinous ritual crimes against minors.
So like the Catholic Church?
And the most recent name I saw made a claim she was 21 when abused. That’s not a minor.
In nice Catholic countries like Brazil, age of consent is 14. That’s a minor.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 7:37 pm to jbdawgs03
quote:
Massie gave the power to redact to Bondi in his bill
Massie expressed displeasure on that clause and made sure the bill had provisions which requires the DOJ to report to Congress within 15 days detailing the categories of released and withheld records, summaries of redactions, and names of referenced “government officials and politically exposed persons.” The bill further mandates that any such redactions by the DOJ are to be “narrowly tailored and temporary” and must include a written justification published in the Federal Register.
Much of the disagreement on the wording of this bill arises from the partisan political nature of crafting a bill that will gain widespread bipartisan support. The sausage factory floor is not always a clean and pristine surface.
‘The Epstein Files Transparency Act’: What’s in it?
…The legislation permits Bondi to withhold or redact information that would personally identify victims, images of death, physical abuse, or injury of any person and documents that would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution.
That last clause has raised concern from figures including Massie and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), who say Trump’s demands to open new investigations into Democrats with ties to Epstein could give cover to Bondi to withhold documents deemed relevant to those probes.
The bill text says withholding for prosecutorial purposes must be “narrowly tailored and temporary,” according to the bill text.
Documents that threaten national defense or foreign policy are also eligible for redaction.
However, the bill says all redactions must be “accompanied by a written justification published in the Federal Register and submitted to Congress.”
After all unclassified information is released, Bondi would then have 15 days to submit to the House and Senate Judiciary committees a report listing: all categories of records released and withheld, summaries of redactions made, including legal basis and a list of all government officials and politically exposed persons named or referenced in the released materials.
This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 9:06 pm
Posted on 11/19/25 at 7:39 pm to BHS78
quote:
Dems will scream that it is to protect Trump, then he will say to release unredacted files and they will run to one of their judges to block the release. I have learned their playbook.
And SFP will show up to defend democrats and blame bad orange man
Posted on 11/20/25 at 6:28 am to dgnx6
When are you cult members going to realize a majority of the GOP ,congress and senate now see continuing to back Trump is walking down a dead end LOOSING street.
Don't believe....look what the American voting public had to say in the recent election.....Trump....MAGA got smoked.
My frustration is I have to wait so long (November 2026) for Trump to be blasted into oblivion and the Democratic process can return .
Don't believe....look what the American voting public had to say in the recent election.....Trump....MAGA got smoked.
My frustration is I have to wait so long (November 2026) for Trump to be blasted into oblivion and the Democratic process can return .
Posted on 11/20/25 at 6:29 am to fairweatherfans
Lol beautiful man just beautiful.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 6:30 am to Geekboy
But it was supposed to be Hillary’ s turn.
If she had won in 2016 none of this would be known.
If she had won in 2016 none of this would be known.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 6:38 am to Geekboy
This is exactly what I've been saying......
The "files" people are wishing for probably no longer exist, if they ever did.
The "files" people are wishing for probably no longer exist, if they ever did.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 6:40 am to fairweatherfans
frick off, commie fig.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:12 pm to dgnx6
Correct...no smoking gun just the FACTS, names that were rapeing young women.
All the banks that funded the Epstein sex trafficking listed.
It's a long wait till November 2026 but it's going to be worth watching Trump and his cult castrated.
All the banks that funded the Epstein sex trafficking listed.
It's a long wait till November 2026 but it's going to be worth watching Trump and his cult castrated.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:38 pm to Rip Torn
That's a hell of alot of assumptions.A fact you have wrong is Epstein "died" in a maximum security prison under 24 hour watch.
Epstein's death was under the Trump administration.
Bill Barr was the last person to see him alive !
Epstein's death was under the Trump administration.
Bill Barr was the last person to see him alive !
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:43 pm to fairweatherfans
quote:
Please give me another credible reason for Trump doing all in his power to prevent the release of the Full Epstein Files.
Give me a credible reason that if the e dems had try e files for four years and trumps name was all over it why didn’t they release it…………hmm inquiring minds want to know
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:44 pm to Geekboy
quote:
Here’s exactly what the upcoming Epstein files will look like!
“Epstein was not an intel asset”
“Here’s proof”
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:46 pm to fairweatherfans
quote:
Sorry but Trump only protects one person HIMSELF.
Look at this TDS bitch
Posted on 11/22/25 at 2:50 pm to Houag80
Typical... when all else fails call EM' a commie.
LOL LOL LOL
LOL LOL LOL
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News