- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Here we go again: Federal judge blocks $3.6 billion transfer to border wall
Posted on 12/10/19 at 7:06 pm
Posted on 12/10/19 at 7:06 pm
NOTE: as expected, the judge in this decision is a dem appointee (Clinton). 
LINK
A U.S. federal judge on Tuesday ruled against President Donald Trump’s attempt to transfer $3.6 billion in military construction funds to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.
In a 21-page opinion, El Paso, Texas-based U.S. District Court Judge David Briones issued a permanent injunction that prohibited the Trump administration from using the funds for border barriers.
Does this one have to make it to the SC too?!?!
LINK
A U.S. federal judge on Tuesday ruled against President Donald Trump’s attempt to transfer $3.6 billion in military construction funds to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.
In a 21-page opinion, El Paso, Texas-based U.S. District Court Judge David Briones issued a permanent injunction that prohibited the Trump administration from using the funds for border barriers.
Does this one have to make it to the SC too?!?!
11
Posted on 12/10/19 at 7:13 pm to conservativewifeymom
If the USSC already said he could, this guy can pound sand. It is time for these judges to be put in their place.
This is an executive branch function and they should tell him he has no jurisdiction. What can he do about it? Nothing.
The Constitution says the branches are co equal and the Judicial is not superior.
This is an executive branch function and they should tell him he has no jurisdiction. What can he do about it? Nothing.
The Constitution says the branches are co equal and the Judicial is not superior.
This post was edited on 12/10/19 at 7:17 pm
Posted on 12/10/19 at 7:19 pm to antibarner
Reuters does a peepoor job of explaining the the judges authority or logic
Posted on 12/10/19 at 7:26 pm to conservativewifeymom
Rand Paul approves. 
Posted on 12/10/19 at 7:30 pm to conservativewifeymom
5th circuit will slap this down with a quickness
Posted on 12/10/19 at 7:35 pm to conservativewifeymom
Just more evidence that judicial appointments may well be the most vital accomplishment of the Trump administration.
Posted on 12/10/19 at 7:39 pm to conservativewifeymom
It'll go to a Circuit Court of Appeals and be overturned.
Posted on 12/10/19 at 7:42 pm to conservativewifeymom
he should be immediately and publicly disbarred as they perp walk him to the street and take his keys to the office away for ruling in direct contradiction the settled law just established by SCOTUS
Posted on 12/10/19 at 7:43 pm to conservativewifeymom
Meanwhile Cartels are raping Chinese immigrants trying to get into the US.
Democrats are pro rape and that’s just awful.
Democrats are pro rape and that’s just awful.
Posted on 12/10/19 at 7:45 pm to conservativewifeymom
What standing?
Posted on 12/10/19 at 7:45 pm to conservativewifeymom
He made his ruling, let’s see him try to enforce it
Posted on 12/10/19 at 7:54 pm to conservativewifeymom
What. the. frick.
The USSC has already stayed one injunction on this. Did the district court grant a stay on its own ruling? It should have.
The USSC has already stayed one injunction on this. Did the district court grant a stay on its own ruling? It should have.
Posted on 12/10/19 at 7:59 pm to conservativewifeymom
quote:
Judge David Briones
Holy shite a 70+ year old serious left wing latino and member of La Raza out of El Paso appointed by Bill Clinton ... go figure. Who would've thunk it?
fricker needs to die and let Trump replace his sorry arse.
Posted on 12/10/19 at 8:10 pm to antibarner
So much winning 
I thought Mexico was paying for it? Yet another Trump scam that has to be fixed in court
The money wasn't appropriated for that. Learn what Article 1 is. Thank god we still have judges that care about the constitution.
I thought Mexico was paying for it? Yet another Trump scam that has to be fixed in court
quote:
The Constitution says the branches are co equal and the Judicial is not superior.
The money wasn't appropriated for that. Learn what Article 1 is. Thank god we still have judges that care about the constitution.
Posted on 12/10/19 at 8:22 pm to zunic
It’s cute when you dumbasses act like the Constitution is important.
Dems ideas on the Constitution are so bipolar it is impossible to take any of you seriously
Dems ideas on the Constitution are so bipolar it is impossible to take any of you seriously
Posted on 12/10/19 at 8:25 pm to LSUBadger
But muh impeachment is unconstitutional!
Take a seat buddy
Take a seat buddy
This post was edited on 12/10/19 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 12/10/19 at 8:33 pm to zunic
What the frick are you projecting sport?
Impeachment is perfectly constitutional. The Senate failing to convict is also constitutional
You don’t actually have an informed response and this is the best you can come up with?
Dems being stupid is a pretty worn cliche. Thanks for proving the cliche has a foundation in truth
Impeachment is perfectly constitutional. The Senate failing to convict is also constitutional
You don’t actually have an informed response and this is the best you can come up with?
Dems being stupid is a pretty worn cliche. Thanks for proving the cliche has a foundation in truth
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News