- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hegseth Memo Cuts $580,000,000 in DOD Contracts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:27 am
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:27 am
I couldn't find this mentioned anywhere, and just saw it this morning.
Defense.gov Article
Defense.gov Article
quote:
As part of the Defense Department's ongoing effort to cut wasteful spending, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth signed a memo today directing the termination of more than $580 million in programs, contracts and grants.
The memo, "Continuing Elimination of Wasteful Spending at the Department of Defense," orders an end to various spending identified by the Department of Government Efficiency that does not match the priorities of President Donald J. Trump or the Defense Department, Hegseth said during prerecorded remarks.
"In other words, [the expenditures] are not a good use of taxpayer dollars; [and], ultimately, that's who funds us," Hegseth said.
"We owe [taxpayers] transparency and making sure we're using [the money] well," he added.
The top contract being cut is a software development program for the Defense Civilian Human Resources Management System, which was intended to streamline a significant portion of DOD's legacy human resources program.
The program started in 2018 and was supposed to take one year to develop at a cost of $36 million. However, Hegseth said it is now nearly eight years behind schedule and $280 million over budget.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:28 am to RaginCajunz
quote:
Hegseth Memo Cuts $580,000,000 in DOD Contracts
Somehow the pink haired wackos won’t like this.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:28 am to RaginCajunz
Sadly it isn't even a drop in the bucket but it is still a great start.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:28 am to RaginCajunz
He dead. Money men locking and loading right now.
#hopeIAMwrong
#protecthim
#hopeIAMwrong
#protecthim
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:29 am to RaginCajunz
Judge says unconstitutional by monday
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:29 am to RaginCajunz
Now lets watch the left, who've fantasized about cutting military spending for a generation, suddenly become appalled at the idea of cutting military spending.
This post was edited on 3/21/25 at 8:31 am
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:30 am to notsince98
quote:
Sadly it isn't even a drop in the bucket but it is still a great start.
I was going to post this sarcastically, but you beat me to it - except you are serious.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:30 am to Cosmo
quote:
Judge says unconstitutional by monday
Its definitely going to happen.
and it will be shortly followed by 7000 SFP posts justifying yet another lawfare move by democrats.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:32 am to RaginCajunz
quote:
making sure we're using [the money] well
Let's get to the part where they're not using [the money] at all.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:33 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
and it will be shortly followed by 7000 SFP posts justifying yet another lawfare move by democrats.
Nothing has been done, so your boogeyman won't come to pass anytime soon.
The DOD is fully funded at Biden levels THROUGH September.
*edited the correct timeframe to add another month
This post was edited on 3/21/25 at 8:35 am
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Nothing has been done, so your boogeyman won't come to pass anytime soon.
You jst posted, just like he predicted, you fricking idiot.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:35 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Don’t the judges keep saying they have to use the money?
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:36 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
You jst posted, just like he predicted, you fricking idiot.
Mr. illiterate, he posted that I would follow a "lawfare" ruling by a judge made by Monday with support of the ruling.
He was wrong.
This post was edited on 3/21/25 at 8:37 am
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:36 am to SlowFlowPro
LOL. A legal challenge to a meaningful Trump era initiative by a left wing judge no more a boogeyman than the sun is when it breaks over the eastern horizon every morning.
But this will be a delicious little "bookmark and bump" for later, so thanks for that.
But this will be a delicious little "bookmark and bump" for later, so thanks for that.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:37 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
LOL. A legal challenge to a meaningful Trump era initiative by a left wing judge no more a boogeyman than the sun is when it breaks over the eastern horizon every morning.
So when no injunction happens by Monday, what do I win (other than being right for the 1,000,000th time)?
quote:
But this will be a delicious little "bookmark and bump" for later, so thanks for that.
The DOD is fully funded at Biden levels through September.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:37 am to RaginCajunz
There is much more in the way of contracts that can be cut but the MIC isn't going to like this and will fight back with all they have... These DoD contracts are how most of our politicians have gotten rich...
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So when no injunction happens by Monday, what do I win
you get to still be fat and annoying
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:41 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Don’t the judges keep saying they have to use the money?
Judges didn't carry Bidenomics through to September.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:41 am to Vacherie Saint
Why do you keep avoiding comment on Trump and Congress funding the DOD at Biden levels through September?
Popular
Back to top
