- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Harvard loses ability to enroll foreign students
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:13 pm to TBoy
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:13 pm to TBoy
quote:
What civil rights law strips Harvard of its ability to select its own students for admission? I'll wait for your answer.
When Harvard is in bed with the ccp they deserve much more severe punishment.
0
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:14 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
Maybe, but the Supremes will eventually uphold it.
Depends if Roberts is on his period again.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:15 pm to The Egg
And the gloves came Off!
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:21 pm to The Egg
quote:
.. for many years there has always been an orchestrated attempt to overthrow New Orleans govt and create a sovereign state within the United States of America --- by, guess who ,??? , the academic institutions
Red Castle (up in Mass.)
Green Castle (here in NOLA)
and after them the rest were supposed to fall on line
The court system and the law were their avenue to gain control
Guess what, both red and green Castle have law schools just for that
This episode with this prison break was one of the cogs in their plan.
It is an EXTENSIVE PLAN
To replace the law as we know it to be , replaced with another kind we have never seen before
And it isn't good
... the court case that is supposed to open the door for academic institutions to claim it to be a sovereign state has been on a US Supreme Court justices' desk since Aug 2018, where an institution was to serve a subpoena and the institution refused ...
But the justice pushed the pause button on the case
Now how would I know all about this ????
because the subpoena was to be served to ME
and it has not been served since 2018 ...
I was an employee of this institution and they refused to serve the subpoena because the item of the lawsuit was that the institution was not governed by US law since is had its own charter
Hence --- a sovereign state
But all of the lower courts rejected this premise until it reach the SCOTUS Desk
And instead of forcing the institution to serve the subpoena --- the pause button was pushed
You may think this is a small matter
But it is not
Instead this may just destroy us all .
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:23 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
The irony of calling someone socialist while advocating for direct government control of a school.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:24 pm to TBoy
quote:
What civil rights law strips Harvard of its ability to select its own students for admission? I'll wait for your answer.
I'm sure those more knowledgeable can come up with a lot more, but I'm set with simply citing Title VI of the CRA.
No discrimination based on race, color, or national origin.
Quite obviously, this could be done - righteously - even in the absence of this current absurdly, obviously anti-semitic incident. So take your pick.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:27 pm to Big Scrub TX
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:30 pm to bayou2
... these people have tried everything to put me in jail, in prison, to bury me under concrete, run over by 18 Wheeler truck, air plane crash (2 or 3) , car accidents, orcastrated school shooting, and the list goes on.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:34 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Since when is this board or the federal government concerned about civil rights?
This board? Always has been.
You saw very little sympathy for those idiots in Georgia. The most common targets of official discrimination right now are Asians and Jews, and this board would overwhelmingly favor the Ivies being 100% Asian if those are the students with the best credentials.
The federal government? Since January 20.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 4:30 pm to BarberitosDawg
LINK
... 2018
... on the SCOTUS desk since 2018 ...
quote:
Sealed vs. Sealed: The U.S. Supreme Court might hear a secret case about a grand jury subpoena
Posted on December 30, 2018 by willmann
... 2018
quote:
Robert Willmann
A sealed and secret court case about a grand jury subpoena made its way from the federal district court (trial court) to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Now the supreme court has opened its door slightly and, after receiving some papers, has whispered back that it is thinking about whether it will hear the case. The current deadline for a response is Monday at High Noon on New Year's Eve. However, one was filed by the government (possibly through the "special counsel" Robert Mueller group) on Friday, 28 December–
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/18a669.html
https://turcopolier.typepad.com/files/sealed_gj_case_sup_court_docket.pdf
This case started out anonymously in a federal district court in Washington D.C. At some point, when it was at the court of appeals, a reporter or staffer for the Politico website was in the appellate court clerk's office when a lawyer came in, and was overheard asking for a copy of the special counsel's latest sealed filing. When approached by the Politico person, the lawyer refused to give his name or identify his client [1]. This started an ongoing rumor that a closed court proceeding was going on that might have to do with the Robert Mueller investigation about the Russian government and the Trump presidential campaign.
... on the SCOTUS desk since 2018 ...
Posted on 5/22/25 at 4:41 pm to BigGreenTiger
quote:
Small Government strikes again!
Ha. What an ignorant comment.
The fedgov was always meant to:
Defend the country
Protect the border
Handle foreign affairs
Regulate trade both b/t states and other countries
Manage a postal system
Regulate currency
Everything else was up to the states. Trump is trying to get back to the fedgov's most basic functions. Handle the big, national level stuff. Stop regulating daily lives.
Regulating visa programs is 100% within his executive role.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 4:50 pm to BigGreenTiger
No, BIG Government.
It's a canard to think either the Democrats or Republicans or MAGA are advocates of smaller less intrusive government. All of them will try to use government to bludgeon, bully and coerce.. It just depends whose shyt list you are on.
It's a canard to think either the Democrats or Republicans or MAGA are advocates of smaller less intrusive government. All of them will try to use government to bludgeon, bully and coerce.. It just depends whose shyt list you are on.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 5:00 pm to TBoy
quote:
What civil rights law strips Harvard of its ability to select its own students for admission? I'll wait for your answer.
Civil Rights Act of 1964
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:41 am to The Egg
So the administration will fight the American but also worldwide problem of antisemitism by banning attendance at Harvard by kids from Israel? This makes no sense, it is too broad.
Netenyahu co-attended Harvard (while at MIT) for goodness sakes.
Netenyahu co-attended Harvard (while at MIT) for goodness sakes.
Posted on 5/23/25 at 6:09 am to Eurocat
Ive listened to four pages of civil rights regarding the admission of foreign students. Thats not the issue.
Its the federal govt protecting the rights of all citizens, and if the school refuses to do that, the federal govt will do all within its purview to ensure it happens. One of these is to control student visas.
They could call out the national guard and bar protesters from attending the schools, would that be better?
Protesting is done with a permit in a designated area, not blocking and harassing students of a different religion. If this were protests against blacks this would have come to a full stop in a new york minute.
Its the federal govt protecting the rights of all citizens, and if the school refuses to do that, the federal govt will do all within its purview to ensure it happens. One of these is to control student visas.
They could call out the national guard and bar protesters from attending the schools, would that be better?
Protesting is done with a permit in a designated area, not blocking and harassing students of a different religion. If this were protests against blacks this would have come to a full stop in a new york minute.
Posted on 5/23/25 at 6:13 am to Trauma14
quote:
Regulating visa programs is 100% within his executive role.
Correct.
It is article II foreign affairs all the way.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News