- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gun reform that doesn't violate the 2nd Amendment
Posted on 2/14/18 at 10:58 pm to winston318
Posted on 2/14/18 at 10:58 pm to winston318
Why can't people like winston318 ever be the victims of mass shootings? If you are going to shoot someone at least clean up some of the vermin of society
This post was edited on 2/14/18 at 10:59 pm
Posted on 2/14/18 at 11:00 pm to winston318
quote:
Impose a mass shooting tax on all semiautomatic weapons. Make it around 50k
And what do you do for those who purchase guns illegally and couldn't care less about your tax?
Posted on 2/14/18 at 11:00 pm to winston318
quote:
All of the weapons that you currently own or inherit are grandfathered in.
This first part takes the teeth right out of your reform.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 11:02 pm to Eli Goldfinger
I'm a lot more fearful of what the OP would do with government that what millennials will do with guns.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 11:06 pm to Rougarou13
quote:How so? A persons right to own the gun has not been taken away. Explain to me how this is infringing on their second amendment rights. The constitution doesnt say that a tax on arms can't be imposed
That would constitute infringement.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 11:06 pm to winston318
Power to tax is the power to destroy. Same reason we don’t tax churches.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 11:10 pm to winston318
Because the Second Amendment will raise it's weary head and some of the champions of this attempt to kill the Constitution will catch bullets at random riding around on their lawn mowers about as easily as liberals do it by attacking them and breaking their ribs. Easier actually since your grandma will be able to pull this off by walking up with a plate of cookies and lemonade and a .380. You can't stop it. Drones, tanks, stealth bombers, satellites, none of it beats the second amendment and this is the reality you live in whether you like it or not. I suggest you figure something a bit more realistic out that doesn't end so horribly bad for you.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 11:14 pm to winston318
quote:
How so? A persons right to own the gun has not been taken away
It effectively ensures that a certain group of people (lower, lower middle class) are unable to exercise their right to bear arms. At the very least it would be extremely difficult for them. Sure they have the right, they just need to have money first.
Literacy tests for voting would be perfectly acceptable under your premise. Everyone would still have the right to vote, they just need to learn to read first.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 11:15 pm to Captain Rumbeard
You win a war of ideas by the validity and righteousness of your argument(s), not by veiled threats of violence.
Take that shite somewhere else.
Take that shite somewhere else.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 11:46 pm to winston318
quote:
Impose a mass shooting tax on all semiautomatic weapons
So everyone can carry a 6 shooter in a holster instead of a sub compact semi auto personal defense gun?
Hell yea. I’d like to see some quick draw action in Chicago
Posted on 2/14/18 at 11:48 pm to winston318
Better Idea..... Work on the human condition.
However, YOU WILL NEVER stop mass killing.
However, YOU WILL NEVER stop mass killing.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 11:49 pm to winston318
quote:
Impose a mass shooting tax
If a simple ID is considered a tax to oppress the vote of poor people, why would you want them to not be able to protect their homes and family?
Posted on 2/14/18 at 11:51 pm to winston318
Are you cool with banning any engine over 25 horsepower?
That would save more lives than your proposed gun control legislation.
It's about saving lives, right? No one NEEDS an engine with more than 25hp. No one NEEDS to go fast.
Think of the lives saved. Think of the children.
If you don't agree with this, than you just need to hop on down off your high horse and stop acting like you give a frick about people dying.
That would save more lives than your proposed gun control legislation.
It's about saving lives, right? No one NEEDS an engine with more than 25hp. No one NEEDS to go fast.
Think of the lives saved. Think of the children.
If you don't agree with this, than you just need to hop on down off your high horse and stop acting like you give a frick about people dying.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 11:52 pm to winston318
Lube up a barrel insert it into your vagina and pull.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 11:53 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
You win a war of ideas by the validity and righteousness of your argument(s), not by veiled threats of violence.
That is the entire purpose of the 2nd.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 11:55 pm to Centinel
no, it isn’t. The 2nd is there to keep the government from withdrawing from the war of ideas
Posted on 2/15/18 at 12:02 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
no, it isn’t. The 2nd is there to keep the government from withdrawing from the war of ideas
And how exactly does it keep the government from withdrawing from the war of ideas?
Posted on 2/15/18 at 12:06 am to Centinel
Violence and resisting tyranny
But it’s not there for you to threaten fellow citizens with violence if they put forth a position you don’t like.
But it’s not there for you to threaten fellow citizens with violence if they put forth a position you don’t like.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News