- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:06 pm to Damone
It’s all about the feel goods. She would feel better about herself.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:09 pm to Centinel
quote:
My firearms have never killed anyone.
Then you should be able to sleep at night without them. Right?
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:11 pm to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
Then you should be able to sleep at night without them. Right?
Your point with this statement?
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:14 pm to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
Then you should be able to sleep at night without them. Right?
Only an idiot would want to do that.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:16 pm to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
Then you should be able to sleep at night without them. Right?
Your car has never killed anyone.
You should be fine without it. Right?
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:22 pm to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
My firearms have never killed anyone.quote:
Then you should be able to sleep at night without them. Right?
You probably thought you had really showed him didn’t you? You poor thing
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:30 pm to Damone
quote:
What is the point of her bill?
Drive up the cost of gun ownership (that disproportionately impacts low-income demographics), increase funding for other useless Democrat-legislated projects (which, like soda taxes, will under perform projections due how easy the tax can be avoided), and exist as yet another example of the failure and ignorance of gun-control advocates. The one possible upside is that this will be successfully challenged in court and CT will be cutting a large check to the SAF, GOA, NRA, or whoever the successful plaintiff party will be.
quote:
How will it make anyone safer?
It won't, but the shills know that. It's an unenforceable law against private citizens, FFL's in CT will lose sales but FFL's in the neighboring states will do better.
This post was edited on 2/5/19 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:31 pm to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
Then you should be able to sleep at night without them. Right?
Your pillow has never killed anyone.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:33 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Neither have any of my weapons or pillows for that matter.
Your pillow has never killed anyone.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:33 pm to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
Then you should be able to sleep at night without them. Right?
I thought BamaAtM was the only poster dumb enough to make an argument like that.
Congrat, you've joined an exclusive club.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:36 pm to Dead End
quote:
No, the gun regulations are all after the fact (no felons, no active restraining order), while car regulations are before you can possess one (licensure, registration, etc).
-BamaAtl
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:40 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Did she really make that argument?
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:41 pm to Centinel
Yep. She actually thought you needed a license, registration, and insurance to possess a vehicle.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:42 pm to Centinel
Often, almost everytime the topic of gun-control is brought up. Nevermind the fact that it is perfectly legal to own a vehicle without insurance or a driver's license.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:46 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Explain how we have more guns in this country and a gun death total that doesn't correlate to that.
That's incredibly easy.
Confounders
You're welcome, as always!
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:46 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
ShortyRob
Ad Homs when you can't make hyperbolic arguments?
Slow day, eh?
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:47 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
That's incredibly easy.
Then do it.
I'll wait, as always.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:49 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Then do it.
Oh no. Do you not know what a confounder is? That's not a good look for you.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:51 pm to BamaAtl
Well isn’t that convenient for you. Just right off the entire statement with one word.
Popular
Back to top


0






