- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gun control narrative # 3,903,754,118 (Connecticut related)
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:24 pm to ShortyRob
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:24 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Number of potential gun deaths has zero to do with why I own guns.
What in the frick gave you the impression that I give a rat's arse about why you personally own guns?
2
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:25 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
What in the frick gave you the impression that I give a rat's arse about why you personally own guns?
Why don’t you want the 18 year old black girl in the hood who’s trying to better her life to be able to defend her life?
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:26 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Number of potential gun deaths has zero to do with why I own guns.
Don't dodge.
Answer the rest of the post.
But, let's take this further. You agreed with my examples. So, why are you not for reducing the number or banning doctors, homebuilders, killing depressed people or banning marriage?
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:26 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Because that's what you're doing when you are asked to explain YOUR assertion and all you do is say, "here, read this".
It's a lot faster than condensing a dozen published journal articles into a paragraph which is essentially exactly what I told you.
Especially when your response is "we don't understand why confounders would matter when comparing variables".
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:26 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
It's a lot faster than condensing a dozen published journal articles into a paragraph which is essentially exactly what I told you.
But, let's take this further. You agreed with my examples. So, why are you not for reducing the number or banning doctors, homebuilders, killing depressed people or banning marriage?
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:26 pm to oleheat
quote:
Sounds like you favor door to door confiscation.
Of Republican first, amirite?
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:27 pm to BamaAtl
Why don’t you want small females to be able to defend themselves from sexual assault or rape?
How is a 100 lb girl going to stop a 250 pound man from raping her?
Why don’t you care about sexual assault victims? If you cared about them you wouldn’t want to strip them of their protection.
How is a 100 lb girl going to stop a 250 pound man from raping her?
Why don’t you care about sexual assault victims? If you cared about them you wouldn’t want to strip them of their protection.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:28 pm to beerJeep
quote:Let's get him to answer my question first.
Why don’t you want small females to be able to defend themselves from sexual assault or rape?
But, let's take this further. You agreed with my examples. So, why are you not for reducing the number or banning doctors, homebuilders, killing depressed people or banning marriage?
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:29 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
So, why are you not for reducing the number or banning doctors, homebuilders, killing depressed people or banning marriage?
Because they provide a benefit to society, and there are already strict rules in place before we can practice medicine, or anyone can build a home (in most places don't fricking lose your shite over building a goddamn cabin in the fricking swamp), or treating depressed individuals, or even divorcing someone!
The degree of outcome between "fewer divorces" and "fewer gun deaths" is also a few scales of magnitude away. Clearly.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:30 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Why don’t you want small females to be able to defend themselves from sexual assault or rape?
The likelihood that a firearm will be used in self-defense is miniscule compared to the chance it will be taken from said woman and used to murder her.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:30 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Because they provide a benefit to society,
Thank you. So now you grasp that there are more variables for keeping a thing that has an identifiable negative effect than simply looking at the negative effect.
Good. And now you know why I don't give a rat's frick about your retarded single variable analysis.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:30 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Because they provide a benefit to society
Firearms provide a benefit to small females. It allows a tiny girl to defend herself against a much larger man.
Why do you support sexual assault?
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:31 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Group statistics are not directly applicable to individuals.
The likelihood that a firearm will be used in self-defense is miniscule compared to the chance it will be taken from said woman and used to murder her.
As a doctor, you should know this.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:31 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
The likelihood that a firearm will be used in self-defense is miniscule compared to the chance it will be taken from said woman and used to murder her.
If it saves one life. Right bitch?
Oh, and uh. All of these personal stories show that it happens far more than you are willing to admit. LINK
Like I said, why do you support sexual assault? You’re nothing but a hypocritical little whore
This post was edited on 2/5/19 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:32 pm to texridder
quote:
That will teach him to try to use data and studies to demonstrate his point.
I could give two shits about junk data/studies from gun control groups.
They cancel themselves out.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:32 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Group statistics are not directly applicable to individuals.
Population statistics are more useful in planning for outcomes than anecdotes which do not mitigate overall harm.
If 50 people have to die for every 1 woman saved from sexual assault, would you take that trade? Or would you work to save the 50 people and find other ways to protect the 1 woman?
What about 500 people? 5000?
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:32 pm to Wtodd
quote:
it WILL be brought up in your state legislature.
That would make ammunition an good investment right now.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:32 pm to BamaAtl
You know much that isn’t so
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:33 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
single variable analysis.
Everything I linked was multivariate.
Obviously - because unlike our buddy DisplacedBuckeye, I know what that word meant before today.
Posted on 2/5/19 at 3:33 pm to BamaAtl
quote:But you're so self-righteous you want to take away the right for everyone you don't care about anyone else other than what you want. You want to ban guns and you dont care about others rights. Yet you want others to recognize your rights. You are just like any other liberal progressive you cannot think for yourself.
The likelihood that a firearm will be used in self-defense is miniscule compared to the chance it will be taken from said woman and used to murder her.
Page 12 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News