- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Great summary on the “Foreign” influence on scotus. Hint: it’s not China
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Some nefarious version of British banking doesn't control the world
It may be based in Britain, but it isn't British.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:44 pm to FLTech
Confirmation bias on your part
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
Wow slo 6 post from you on the first page to try and discredit something that you don't believe. You should try not clicking on the thread or maybe not commenting on things like this. No one here wants to hear your take on every single issue in life. Give it a rest.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:55 pm to FLTech
Just means you are dropping all pretenses of being a verifiable loon when you are extolling the virtues and wisdom of Lyndon LaRouche cast offs of which Susan Kokinda is.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:58 pm to Tantal
quote:
It may be based in Britain, but it isn't British.
If you believe this, you also think she's wrong.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:59 pm to Branson
quote:
Wow slo 6 post from you on the first page to try and discredit something that you don't believe.
Yes, and?
quote:
You should try not clicking on the thread or maybe not commenting on things like this.
Why? That sounds anti-productive in the age of dishonest online content.
quote:
No one here wants to hear your take on every single issue in life.
What % of threads do you think I've posted in today, exactly?
This post was edited on 2/24/26 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:07 pm to Ailsa
If conservatives understood the flaws of the free market system like this woman instead of being emotionally attached to an ideology, there wouldn't be near as many melts on this board.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
Did you listen to what she said or are you just letting us know that you are triggered emotionally once again?
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
All of threads that put the Democrats in bad light you always seem to be non-existent. It's weird I know but you post nonstop in the very few that don't.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Some nefarious version of British banking doesn't control the world, which is the thesis of that outfit
Who or what do you consider the Rothchilds?
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:36 pm to Branson
quote:I want to hear it. I disagree with him sometimes, but he is a provocative thinker and not just a bomb throwing troll.
No one here wants to hear your take on every single issue in life.
In this case I tend to agree with him that’s it’s not “British interests”. If they controlled the world they would not be having anemic growth. However, that lady did not say it was the British; she said it was the same system.
I think she is off base. I believe she is equating the One-Worlders with the British system in the Victorian era. There are similarities, but the British system was nationalistic - the very opposite of the WEF types who want a one-world government.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
Lyndon LaRouche acolyte...
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:57 pm to Beessnax
quote:
Did you listen to what she said
Yes. This and multiple other videos.
quote:
are you just letting us know that you are triggered emotionally once again?
Something that has never happened did not just happen again. We're still at 0 on that counter.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:57 pm to Branson
quote:
All of threads that put the Democrats in bad light you always seem to be non-existent. It's weird I know but you post nonstop in the very few that don't.
What do Democrats have to do with this thread/discussion?
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:58 pm to BestBanker
quote:
Who or what do you consider the Rothchilds?
They are associated with Jewish banking conspiracies, not British ones. Any overlap with the UK is either coincidental (due to the overreaching power of the CT) or a retarded, ad hoc attempt to justify a different CT. Fitting square pegs into round holes, so to speak.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:00 pm to Penrod
quote:
If they controlled the world they would not be having anemic growth.
Correct
quote:
However, that lady did not say it was the British; she said it was the same system.
Watch more of her videos and that picture becomes more clear.
quote:
I believe she is equating the One-Worlders with the British system in the Victorian era. There are similarities, but the British system was nationalistic - the very opposite of the WEF types who want a one-world government.
Yes and it simply ignores how the UK isn't a global power anymore like it was. It lost its hegemonic standard after the losses (and gains, technically) of WW1. WW2 was just the final death blow.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:01 pm to Beessnax
I listened to what she said. I can't get those few minutes back. Q is one thing, but LaRouche types are a special kind of stupid.
Stupid may not be a choice with them.
Stupid may not be a choice with them.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They are associated with Jewish banking conspiracies, not British ones. Any overlap with the UK is either coincidental (due to the overreaching power of the CT) or a retarded, ad hoc attempt to justify a different CT. Fitting square pegs into round holes, so to speak.
some light history of the British Rothchilds banking family
quote:
The Rothschild banking family of England is the British branch of the Rothschild family. It was founded in 1798 by Nathan Mayer Rothschild (1777–1836), who first settled in Manchester before moving to London, Kingdom of Great Britain (in present-day United Kingdom). He was sent there from his home in Frankfurt by his father, Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744–1812). Wanting his sons to succeed on their own and to expand the family business across Europe, Mayer Amschel Rothschild had his eldest son remain in Frankfurt, while his four other sons were sent to different European cities to establish a financial institution to invest in business and provide banking services. Nathan Mayer Rothschild, the third son, first established a textile jobbing business in Manchester and from there went on to establish N M Rothschild & Sons bank in London.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:09 pm to BestBanker
quote:
Any overlap with the UK is either coincidental (due to the overreaching power of the CT)
Popular
Back to top


1





