Started By
Message

re: Great summary on the “Foreign” influence on scotus. Hint: it’s not China

Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:14 pm to
Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
19821 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

Some nefarious version of British banking doesn't control the world

It may be based in Britain, but it isn't British.
Posted by Branson
Member since Dec 2023
247 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:36 pm to
Thanks wolfhound
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37489 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:44 pm to
Confirmation bias on your part
Posted by Branson
Member since Dec 2023
247 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:44 pm to
Wow slo 6 post from you on the first page to try and discredit something that you don't believe. You should try not clicking on the thread or maybe not commenting on things like this. No one here wants to hear your take on every single issue in life. Give it a rest.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37489 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:55 pm to
Just means you are dropping all pretenses of being a verifiable loon when you are extolling the virtues and wisdom of Lyndon LaRouche cast offs of which Susan Kokinda is.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476467 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

It may be based in Britain, but it isn't British.

If you believe this, you also think she's wrong.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476467 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

Wow slo 6 post from you on the first page to try and discredit something that you don't believe.

Yes, and?

quote:

You should try not clicking on the thread or maybe not commenting on things like this.

Why? That sounds anti-productive in the age of dishonest online content.

quote:

No one here wants to hear your take on every single issue in life.

What % of threads do you think I've posted in today, exactly?
This post was edited on 2/24/26 at 3:00 pm
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
11342 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:07 pm to
If conservatives understood the flaws of the free market system like this woman instead of being emotionally attached to an ideology, there wouldn't be near as many melts on this board.
Posted by Beessnax
Member since Nov 2015
11106 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:08 pm to
Did you listen to what she said or are you just letting us know that you are triggered emotionally once again?
Posted by Branson
Member since Dec 2023
247 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:11 pm to
All of threads that put the Democrats in bad light you always seem to be non-existent. It's weird I know but you post nonstop in the very few that don't.
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
19449 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Some nefarious version of British banking doesn't control the world, which is the thesis of that outfit

Who or what do you consider the Rothchilds?
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55427 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

No one here wants to hear your take on every single issue in life.
I want to hear it. I disagree with him sometimes, but he is a provocative thinker and not just a bomb throwing troll.

In this case I tend to agree with him that’s it’s not “British interests”. If they controlled the world they would not be having anemic growth. However, that lady did not say it was the British; she said it was the same system.

I think she is off base. I believe she is equating the One-Worlders with the British system in the Victorian era. There are similarities, but the British system was nationalistic - the very opposite of the WEF types who want a one-world government.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
7901 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:40 pm to
Lyndon LaRouche acolyte...
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476467 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Did you listen to what she said


Yes. This and multiple other videos.

quote:

are you just letting us know that you are triggered emotionally once again?

Something that has never happened did not just happen again. We're still at 0 on that counter.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476467 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

All of threads that put the Democrats in bad light you always seem to be non-existent. It's weird I know but you post nonstop in the very few that don't.


What do Democrats have to do with this thread/discussion?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476467 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Who or what do you consider the Rothchilds?


They are associated with Jewish banking conspiracies, not British ones. Any overlap with the UK is either coincidental (due to the overreaching power of the CT) or a retarded, ad hoc attempt to justify a different CT. Fitting square pegs into round holes, so to speak.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476467 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

If they controlled the world they would not be having anemic growth.

Correct

quote:

However, that lady did not say it was the British; she said it was the same system.

Watch more of her videos and that picture becomes more clear.

quote:

I believe she is equating the One-Worlders with the British system in the Victorian era. There are similarities, but the British system was nationalistic - the very opposite of the WEF types who want a one-world government.

Yes and it simply ignores how the UK isn't a global power anymore like it was. It lost its hegemonic standard after the losses (and gains, technically) of WW1. WW2 was just the final death blow.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37489 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:01 pm to
I listened to what she said. I can't get those few minutes back. Q is one thing, but LaRouche types are a special kind of stupid.

Stupid may not be a choice with them.
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
19449 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

They are associated with Jewish banking conspiracies, not British ones. Any overlap with the UK is either coincidental (due to the overreaching power of the CT) or a retarded, ad hoc attempt to justify a different CT. Fitting square pegs into round holes, so to speak.



some light history of the British Rothchilds banking family

quote:

The Rothschild banking family of England is the British branch of the Rothschild family. It was founded in 1798 by Nathan Mayer Rothschild (1777–1836), who first settled in Manchester before moving to London, Kingdom of Great Britain (in present-day United Kingdom). He was sent there from his home in Frankfurt by his father, Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744–1812). Wanting his sons to succeed on their own and to expand the family business across Europe, Mayer Amschel Rothschild had his eldest son remain in Frankfurt, while his four other sons were sent to different European cities to establish a financial institution to invest in business and provide banking services. Nathan Mayer Rothschild, the third son, first established a textile jobbing business in Manchester and from there went on to establish N M Rothschild & Sons bank in London.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476467 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

Any overlap with the UK is either coincidental (due to the overreaching power of the CT)
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram