- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Governor Abbott releases statement on sgt perry
Posted on 4/8/23 at 10:27 pm to tigerbaitlawyer
Posted on 4/8/23 at 10:27 pm to tigerbaitlawyer
quote:
I believe in following the law and letting the process work its way out.
Unless you don't agree with it, apparently.
Posted on 4/8/23 at 10:29 pm to biglego
quote:
I think he’s saying potential jurors can lie during voir dire. Which anyone with a functioning brain understands.
And I’m saying SFP is dick-sucking statist. Which anyone with a functioning brain understands.
This post was edited on 4/8/23 at 10:31 pm
Posted on 4/8/23 at 10:30 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
And I’m saying SFP is dick-sucking statist. Which anyone with a functioning brain understands.
Melt: day 1000
Posted on 4/8/23 at 10:32 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
How stupid are you exactly?
tex diddler has always been a dumbass commie
Posted on 4/8/23 at 10:33 pm to the808bass
quote:
Sounds like someone with reasonable fear of serious physical injury.
And it further sounds like texridder has no clue what the low ready position means.
Posted on 4/8/23 at 10:35 pm to texridder
quote:
I believe he was going to aim at me. I didn’t want to give him a chance to aim at me," Perry told Detective Fugitt in the interview.
Well, yeah. If you wait until you’re looking down the barrel you’ve waited too damn long.
Posted on 4/8/23 at 10:37 pm to tigerbaitlawyer
quote:
Politicizing the judicial system is very dangerous.
I very much agree, but that happened with the Soros DA decided to file charges.
Posted on 4/8/23 at 10:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
The judicial process is not a political one. He has a right to an appeal and for two more layers of court review.
Pardon is a last resort for a guilty person!
Pardon is a last resort for a guilty person!
Posted on 4/8/23 at 10:41 pm to tigerbaitlawyer
quote:
The judicial process is not a political one.
You drank ALL the koolaid at law school.
Posted on 4/8/23 at 10:44 pm to tigerbaitlawyer
quote:
The judicial process is not a political one.
Is the DA not politically elected? Didn’t the one in Manhattan run a political campaign specifically on “getting Trump?”
Posted on 4/8/23 at 10:47 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
Is the DA not politically elected?
Even if they were appointed, who would be appointing them? A politician. I cannot fathom making that claim in 2023. I’m thinking he’s not long out of law school; it takes a while for the programming to fade.
Posted on 4/8/23 at 10:48 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
DA is only one piece of the system that was elected by the people of his district. Unanimous jury, judge, paid defense lawyer, separate police investigation make up the rest.
Posted on 4/8/23 at 10:57 pm to lsufanintexas
quote:
Foster attended an Austin protest on July 25 while Perry was downtown driving for Uber. According to police, Perry stopped his car and honked at people protesting while they walked through the street, blocks from the state Capitol. Seconds later, he drove his car into the crowd, police said.
Foster, who was a 28-year-old white man and an Air Force veteran, had been seen openly carrying an AK-47 rifle at the time, which is legal. There are conflicting accounts as to whether Foster raised the rifle to the driver first — but seconds later Perry, who was also legally armed, shot and killed Foster and fled the area, police said. He called the police and reported what happened, claiming he shot in self defense after Foster aimed his weapon at him. Perry is also a white man.
The case sparked debates over Texas’ “stand your ground” law, which allows people to use deadly force against someone else if they feel they are in danger. But Perry’s social media posts about retaliating against protesters raised questions about the shooter’s state of mind and his self-defense claim.
The “stand your ground” law prohibits an individual from arguing self-defense if they provoked a threat from someone else. Witnesses said that Perry seemed to drive threateningly into the crowd before shots were fired, and his actions seemed intentional.
LINK
Self defense was certainly there. He had a gun pointed at him. But he drove into a crowd. I don't know any details of the case, but chances are there was a video and the jury decided the sergeant provoked Foster. I'm glad I didn't have to sit on that jury. Judging what was on someone's mind is an impossible task.
Posted on 4/8/23 at 11:04 pm to tigerbaitlawyer
quote:
Politicizing the judicial system is very dangerous.
And that is exactly why this verdict is dangerous to anyone who believes in our natural right for self defense. The Darwin Award Winner approached a mobbed car while brandishing a rifle in the low ready position. By any objective standard, any reasonable person would view Foster’s act as an imminent and deadly threat.
quote:
I believe in following the law and letting the process work its way out.
A governor using his vested powers to seek a pardon after an egregious miscarriage of justice is indeed following the law.
This post was edited on 4/9/23 at 3:53 pm
Posted on 4/8/23 at 11:07 pm to MilwaukeeKosherDills
quote:
But he drove into a crowd.
Where was the crowd?
Posted on 4/8/23 at 11:42 pm to texridder
quote:Believe it or not self-defense does NOT require that you get shot first.
Not according to what Perry told the cops in his interview after the incident.
Posted on 4/9/23 at 12:07 am to texridder
quote:
The police departments almost always say it was a justified shooting. If you read the police interview, see Perry's cell phone records which disprove Perry's claim he was distracted by texting when he drove in the crowd, and see his social media discussions about how he could drive into a crowd and get away with it- you would come to the same conclusion as the jury
Not really. It’s like a goof swing, all that matters is what’s happening right as the club hits the ball
Man pointed an AK T Perry, and he rightly responded
Posted on 4/9/23 at 12:14 am to texridder
quote:
you would come to the same conclusion as the jury.
You mean the conclusion that 12 average libs from Travis County ignore facts and decide the guy with the AK was no threat?
Posted on 4/9/23 at 5:45 am to Bulldogblitz
How do you know they were libs?
It is legal to carry an AK47. Gun laws cut both ways.
It is legal to carry an AK47. Gun laws cut both ways.
Posted on 4/9/23 at 5:53 am to Flats
Only ignorant people on message boards are this naive, a jury trial is the proper way to determine facts in a case.
So the victim that was a vet also doesn’t have a story? The evidence showed that the Defendant was the aggressor. You can’t claim self defense if you are an aggressor. He drove his car into a crowd.
So the victim that was a vet also doesn’t have a story? The evidence showed that the Defendant was the aggressor. You can’t claim self defense if you are an aggressor. He drove his car into a crowd.
Popular
Back to top



0








