- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Go on record: for or against bombing In Syria
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:49 pm to LSURulzSEC
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:49 pm to LSURulzSEC
quote:
That's right there are none
Correct
quote:
but people are always bitching about why we do things alone instead of having a coalition of allies,
I'm not one FWIW. I don't give a shite what other countries think.
quote:
now we have two old allies involved with us this time and people like you want to bitch...
Yeah, I bitch because it is stupid. Getting involved in more middle east shite does nothing for us. Having "allies" involved doesn't change that.
0
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:58 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:59 pm to BBONDS25
Against
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:59 pm to John McClane
Who downvotes this sentiment?
Posted on 4/13/18 at 11:04 pm to BBONDS25
Against, nothing good can come from this.
Posted on 4/13/18 at 11:08 pm to golfntiger32
quote:
For. Cant let anyone use chemical or nuclear weapons without consequences.
Why can't people understand. It cannot go unchecked. Otherwise it will become rampant.
Posted on 4/13/18 at 11:09 pm to BBONDS25
Against
Posted on 4/13/18 at 11:10 pm to Amazing Moves
The other option is getting Americans killed just to create a power vacuum where another ISIS will take over
Posted on 4/13/18 at 11:10 pm to imjustafatkid
For air strikes.
Posted on 4/13/18 at 11:10 pm to BBONDS25
Against
Posted on 4/13/18 at 11:25 pm to BBONDS25
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 10:24 am
Posted on 4/13/18 at 11:52 pm to BBONDS25
Completely against for multiple reasons.
1. Only congress can make war. The President should not be allowed to do anything militarily without first seeking congressional approval.
2. Billions of dollars wasted on something that has nothing to do with American security. These bombings do not protect 1 single American so why bother.
3. Once again America is involving itself in the business of another sovereign country.
4. What proof do we have that Assad did this. In my opinion this is another false flag offensive just like the Gulf of Tonkin incident.
1. Only congress can make war. The President should not be allowed to do anything militarily without first seeking congressional approval.
2. Billions of dollars wasted on something that has nothing to do with American security. These bombings do not protect 1 single American so why bother.
3. Once again America is involving itself in the business of another sovereign country.
4. What proof do we have that Assad did this. In my opinion this is another false flag offensive just like the Gulf of Tonkin incident.
Posted on 4/14/18 at 12:04 am to BBONDS25
Against. Oh and:
Donald Trump
quote:
Be prepared, there is a small chance that our horrendous leadership could unknowingly lead us into World War III.
5:46 AM - Aug 31, 2013
quote:
Now that Obama’s poll numbers are in tailspin – watch for him to launch a strike in Libya or Iran. He is desperate.
Donald Trump
Posted on 4/14/18 at 12:08 am to BBONDS25
against
Posted on 4/14/18 at 12:15 am to BBONDS25
For
A hard statement for sure but one that absolutely needs to be made. Gas your citizens in order to control should never be an option on the table.
AND.... Countries need to understand that the US is no longer led by a pussy.
A hard statement for sure but one that absolutely needs to be made. Gas your citizens in order to control should never be an option on the table.
AND.... Countries need to understand that the US is no longer led by a pussy.
Posted on 4/14/18 at 12:18 am to BBONDS25
Against...I'm a Trump voter and will vote for him in next the election.
Posted on 4/14/18 at 12:19 am to BBONDS25
Against
I'd bet good money that one of our Intel agency backed groups did the gassing and not Assad. Therefore we decide to help the Syrians out by bombing them.
So we help gas them then bomb them for us helping gas them. Sound logic.
I'd bet good money that one of our Intel agency backed groups did the gassing and not Assad. Therefore we decide to help the Syrians out by bombing them.
So we help gas them then bomb them for us helping gas them. Sound logic.
Posted on 4/14/18 at 12:22 am to MrLarson
quote:
So we help gas them then bomb them for us helping gas them. Sound logic
Guessing I need to drink more to comprehend that logic. Any sources available for that or just your speculation on the topic?
Posted on 4/14/18 at 12:24 am to Tigerswillprevail
Indifferent. Pros and cons of each side. If the intimidation tactic with these airstrikes succeeded in stopping whoever is gassing the people then the operation was worth it. It saves multiple innocent lives from a slow cruel painful death. If they keep gassing their people then I'm not sure what America's answer is. America can't afford to put boots on the ground there and get caught in another quagmire in the middle east.
Posted on 4/14/18 at 12:25 am to BBONDS25
Against.
Page 9 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News