
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fun Exercise: Show the AI description of your posting characteristics on TigerDroppings
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:51 pm to UtahCajun
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:51 pm to UtahCajun
quote:
Quite frankly yes. It was creepy. DeBoar had already voiced his opinion against it, yet you did it anyway. The AI said that you were asking permission, yet you clearly did not ask permission.
DeBoar had only ridiculed me for using AI. He hadn't expressed any opposition to the use of it.
quote:
Unfortunately this is why data centers are being put up so people like ivory can spend all day asking it questions.
Thank you for your concern, though. I will consider it.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 4:06 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
DeBoar had only ridiculed me for using AI. He hadn't expressed any opposition to the use of it.
Yes, he did when he thanked me for not using AI as a response.
You are still skirting what your post said. It clearly said you were not creepy because you were asking permission. You did not ask permission. You then are creepy as set by the rules your own AI description gave.
Be better
Be less bad
quote:
I will consider it.
No, quite frankly we all know you will not.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 4:33 pm to UtahCajun
quote:
Yes, he did when he thanked me for not using AI as a response.
You are still skirting what your post said. It clearly said you were not creepy because you were asking permission. You did not ask permission. You then are creepy as set by the rules your own AI description gave.
I wasn't skirting anything. And buzz off for saying "we all know you won't." I always consider criticism here. I have frequently apologized...even in this thread.
I just didn't think it was worth a long response, because the thread is already way too self-indulgent. We understand each other's positions.
Have a nice day.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 5:38 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Try it on amazon...
Amazon Is Keeping Amazingly Detailed Records on Its Customers and They Are Downright Insulting
Amazon Is Keeping Amazingly Detailed Records on Its Customers and They Are Downright Insulting
quote:https://www.threads.com/@sarah.j_ca/post/DeIdhTLGZnI
Would you like a rude, and perhaps slightly humorous, reminder of how much data surveillance Amazon conducts on its customers? Have we got the thing for you!
On Tuesday, one customer shared how she accidentally stumbled on an obscure section on the Amazon website that most of us overlook. It contained, to her horror, a “page of assumptions that Amazon has made about me based on my purchases and I’m literally speechless.”
In a screenshot she provided, she highlighted one standout. Amazon, with brutal objectivity, asserted that she “has flat buttocks.”
Posted on 10/7/26 at 5:44 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I wasn't skirting anything
Whatever. At least the internet is public record of what you did do.
quote:
And buzz off for saying "we all know you won't." I always consider criticism here. I have frequently apologized...even in this thread.
I just didn't think it was worth a long response, because the thread is already way too self-indulgent.
"I apologize Deboar"
That is three measley words that you could not do. Much less than the wishy-washy post you made here.
quote:
We understand each other's positions.
More than you know actually
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:26 pm to UtahCajun
quote:
Whatever. At least the internet is public record of what you did do.
To an objective observer this is ridiculous. I wouldn't have any problem apologizing to DeBoar.
I have always been fair with DeBoar and received zero courtesy in return. He started an entire thread about me based on his misunderstanding about whether or not a new press secretary had been hired to replace Karoline Leavitt. When his mistake was pointed out to him, no apology...in fact he wouldn't answer the simple question: "Has Leavitt been replaced?"
Similarly, he keeps making a false allegation of a bannable offense, that I am an alter. I asked him once if he were an alter. He said no. I have honored this. He doesn't extend the same courtesy.
Here, there is simply nothing for which to apologize. I published a flattering, accurate summary of DeBoar made by ChatGPT from DeBoar's PUBLIC postings to show simply how accurate Chat was. DeBoar has never pointed out any inaccuracy in that summary.
Instead, we get the usual passive aggressive ploy by DeBoar.
quote:
I can run many on you but not going to as again I think someone like you who uses AI for everything shows how inept you truly are.
No complaint about invasion of privacy or creepy behavior. Just the usual inane criticism, followed by some dodge of the real issue between us: AI wouldn't support DeBoar's ridiculous assertions that I support Democrats or leftist policies.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:35 pm to Ailsa
quote:
a screenshot she provided, she highlighted one standout. Amazon, with brutal objectivity, asserted that she “has flat buttocks.”
Yikes
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:01 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
My read on Tchefuncte Tiger
Putting all of that together, I don't get the impression that Tchefuncte Tiger is fundamentally an a-hole.![]()
Rather, he strikes me as the kind of guy who probably enjoys being an a-hole occasionally—particularly when he thinks somebody has said something stupid. ??![]()
There's a difference.
My rough characterization would be:
Well-informed, opinionated, independent-minded, sarcastic, somewhat cantankerous, mischievous, and probably more personable than his harsher posts would suggest.
And I'd add "old-school" to that description. His enormous posting history, breadth of interests, and willingness to engage on everything from Louisiana wildlife to old music to LSU suggest someone who genuinely enjoys conversation and has accumulated a lot of knowledge over the years.
If I had to put him on a spectrum:
Nice guy: 7/10
Knowledgeable: 9/10
Sarcastic: 9/10
Cantankerous: 8/10
Contrarian: 8/10
Enjoys stirring the pot: 9/10
Actually malicious: probably low
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 7:11 pm
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:09 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
My read on Tchefuncte Tiger
Gotta know. Did you ASK whether or not you were an a-hole?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:13 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Gotta know. Did you ASK whether or not you were an a-hole?
Nope!
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:14 pm to IvoryBillMatt
I don’t need anything from you. I myself do owe utahcajun an apology. He’s a stand up guy and I appreciate his comments in this thread and I always haven’t been fair to him, which is undeserving as he can have an interaction without the use of AI.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:25 pm to DeBoar
quote:
don’t need anything from you.
Thanks for speaking up.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:42 pm to IvoryBillMatt
You really need to push away from the keyboard.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:46 pm to AUJACK
quote:
really need to push away from the keyboard.
Why? Many people have enjoyed this exercise.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:59 pm to IvoryBillMatt
I don't have that much of an interest in AI's analysis of any posters. This might be a tool of interest to those that live on this board or Google usernames despite their proclamations against AI.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 8:00 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:
Google usernames despite their proclamations against AI.
What? No one would ever do that. That would be psycho.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 8:01 pm to roadGator
quote:
What? No one would ever do that. That would be psycho.
So psycho.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 8:10 pm to Jorts R Us
Do you think you’re more Ferris Bueller or John Bender (the bad boy from the breakfast club)?

Popular
Back to top


1





