
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:05 pm to IvoryBillMatt
IBM, you do realize that chatgpt is programed to tell you what you want to hear. It does suck up to ones ego.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:09 pm to UtahCajun
quote:
But you did run Deboar's without his aporoval. Creepy?
The assertion was that ChatGPT know knew that I was creepy. ChatGPT had access to the entire exchange. ChatGPT didn't conclude that I was creepy. The assertion was incorrect.
Was I creepy in using ChatGPT to analyze DeBoar's public comments on a public message board? I don't find that any creepier than reviewing someone's posting history. Do you?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:12 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Very high-volume, rapid-fire posting. He has tens of thousands of posts and often contributes many short replies within the same thread. His profile currently shows about 92,000 posts.
T
TigerDroppings
Extremely concise. A lot of his posts are one sentence or even a few words: “Fair point,” “Weird EITC,” “Bingo,” etc. He tends to react rather than write long-form arguments.
T
TigerDroppings
Sarcastic and mocking. He frequently uses ridicule, nicknames, exaggeration, and intentionally dismissive phrasing. Examples include “Snack Panther?” and “It's gonna all be free bitches free!”
T
TigerDroppings
Conversational and informal. His writing has the feel of someone talking in real time rather than composing polished prose—abbreviations, slang, profanity, fragments, and occasional typos.
Politically combative. A substantial portion of the recent material I found is in Political Talk, where he generally takes a conservative/right-leaning position and engages opponents through short challenges, sarcasm, and jokes.
T
TigerDroppings
+1
Likes the “drive-by” response. Rather than always developing an argument, he'll drop a punchline, rhetorical question, or one-line jab and move on.
Uses recurring personal/forum language. His profile tagline is “Shoot the tires out!”, and that identity appears attached to his posts.
T
TigerDroppings
Occasionally engages more substantively. When challenged, he can switch from jokes to questions or counterarguments, but he generally maintains the terse, combative style.
T
TigerDroppings
In one sentence: Jbird writes like a high-frequency message-board veteran—short, sarcastic, irreverent, politically combative, and heavily oriented toward quick reactions and one-liners rather than polished exposition.
If you want, I can also break his style down into specific linguistic habits (sentence length, punctuation, vocabulary, insults, humor, argument patterns, etc.) and give you a fairly precise “Jbird style profile.”
Sources
ChatGPT is AI and can make mistakes.
No file chosenNo file chosenNo file chosen
Chat with ChatGPT
T
TigerDroppings
Extremely concise. A lot of his posts are one sentence or even a few words: “Fair point,” “Weird EITC,” “Bingo,” etc. He tends to react rather than write long-form arguments.
T
TigerDroppings
Sarcastic and mocking. He frequently uses ridicule, nicknames, exaggeration, and intentionally dismissive phrasing. Examples include “Snack Panther?” and “It's gonna all be free bitches free!”
T
TigerDroppings
Conversational and informal. His writing has the feel of someone talking in real time rather than composing polished prose—abbreviations, slang, profanity, fragments, and occasional typos.
Politically combative. A substantial portion of the recent material I found is in Political Talk, where he generally takes a conservative/right-leaning position and engages opponents through short challenges, sarcasm, and jokes.
T
TigerDroppings
+1
Likes the “drive-by” response. Rather than always developing an argument, he'll drop a punchline, rhetorical question, or one-line jab and move on.
Uses recurring personal/forum language. His profile tagline is “Shoot the tires out!”, and that identity appears attached to his posts.
T
TigerDroppings
Occasionally engages more substantively. When challenged, he can switch from jokes to questions or counterarguments, but he generally maintains the terse, combative style.
T
TigerDroppings
In one sentence: Jbird writes like a high-frequency message-board veteran—short, sarcastic, irreverent, politically combative, and heavily oriented toward quick reactions and one-liners rather than polished exposition.
If you want, I can also break his style down into specific linguistic habits (sentence length, punctuation, vocabulary, insults, humor, argument patterns, etc.) and give you a fairly precise “Jbird style profile.”
Sources
ChatGPT is AI and can make mistakes.
No file chosenNo file chosenNo file chosen
Chat with ChatGPT
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:14 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I don't find that any creepier than reviewing someone's posting history. Do you?
Lazy for one and again depends on the input. I can run many on you but not going to as again I think someone like you who uses AI for everything shows how inept you truly are.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:15 pm to Jbird
Thanks Jbird. I thought that was accurate. Did you?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:17 pm to OWLFAN86
Describe the user OWLFAN86 in 100 words or less
quote:
‘They’ is a jackass.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:19 pm to IvoryBillMatt
I put forth the adequate amount of effort that the thread deserves
Nothing more and nothing less.
Anyone with substantial military service would recognize my posting style.
ABC
Accuracy
Brevity
Clarity
Those are the keys to successful communication.
Nothing more and nothing less.
Anyone with substantial military service would recognize my posting style.
ABC
Accuracy
Brevity
Clarity
Those are the keys to successful communication.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:19 pm to DeBoar
quote:
Lazy for one and again depends on the input.
Lazy...how about extremely efficient?
ChatGPT performed the analysis in less than 15 seconds. You keep claiming input bias, but you will never comment on the accuracy of Chat's summary of you. I thought it was extremely accurate...and complimentary.
Again, you're just disappointed that there is an objective way to test your claims about the positions and political leanings of others.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:21 pm to Jbird
Doesn’t
Ever
fricking make sense.
Ever
fricking make sense.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:22 pm to 4cubbies
Do you believe this to be true?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:22 pm to 4cubbies
What the frick are you babbling about?
Stick to covering for your illegal alien that's raising your spawn
Stick to covering for your illegal alien that's raising your spawn
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:24 pm to Jbird
Jbird, I thought this highlights our differences:
quote:
Likes the “drive-by” response. Rather than always developing an argument, he'll drop a punchline, rhetorical question, or one-line jab and move on.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:24 pm to UtahCajun
I wouldn’t call you combative, but we get along now.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:27 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Was I creepy in using ChatGPT to analyze DeBoar's public comments on a public message board? I don't find that any creepier than reviewing someone's posting history. Do you?
Quite frankly yes. It was creepy. DeBoar had already voiced his opinion against it, yet you did it anyway. The AI said that you were asking permission, yet you clearly did not ask permission.
What Cubbs ran on me is ok. We have had many friendly interactions prior to her doing so. You and I however, well you do not know me from Adam. I also believe the same could be said about you and Deboar. What you did was stalkerish.
You should feel bad
You should be better
You should be less bad.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:27 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
IBM, you do realize that chatgpt is programed to tell you what you want to hear. It does suck up to ones ego.
Of course. That's why asked others to post ones of me to see what the variance was. There didn't seem to be that much difference.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:32 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Meh
Maybe
You annoy some other posters
Maybe
You annoy some other posters
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:36 pm to 4cubbies
Ha ha! Well, Nov 8 after Alabama and Nov 15 after the Texas game I'll be there on the way home back up ....I-59 
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:38 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
I wouldn’t call you combative
I would.
Not my fault. From Opelousas, am ex-military and spent time working offshore. I didn't have a chance LOL
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:47 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Mine from Claude was long, but here is the summary:
"Net impression. A patient, methodical, somewhat lawyerly commenter with a taste for irony and a preference for primary documents, who is outnumbered on this board and writes accordingly. The one place the register slips is in the very short replies, where the dryness can read as dismissive. The long, source-heavy posts are where the style is strongest."
Clanky at best.
"Net impression. A patient, methodical, somewhat lawyerly commenter with a taste for irony and a preference for primary documents, who is outnumbered on this board and writes accordingly. The one place the register slips is in the very short replies, where the dryness can read as dismissive. The long, source-heavy posts are where the style is strongest."
Clanky at best.

Popular
Back to top



1





