- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fulton County admits they did not follow the rules.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:16 am to Knuckle Checker
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:16 am to Knuckle Checker
quote:
Due to the clerical errorquote:
Isn’t that what they arrested Trump for?
0
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:16 am to mwade91383
quote:
None of the current allegations prove a single fraudulent check-in or ballot scan.
Let's ask the Presidential Medal of Freedom winner herself, shall we?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
This of course would never hold up in a court of law.”
I'd love to find out, but we kept witnessing 85% of the cases derailed on procedural shenanigans before the evidence could be presented.
Not that such a minor detail prevented liberal filth everywhere from spiking the stolen football, since they were happy with the results.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:18 am to i am dan
quote:
There were more "clerical errors" in other swing states.
And isn’t it funny how these “clerical errors” seemed to systematically occur in a succession of key swing states?
What a weird coincidence.
Further, many of the lawsuits filed over these “clerical errors” in these key swing states were dismissed on procedural — not evidentiary — claims.
Mountains of sworn testimony and evidence was presented to the legislatures in the contested battleground states demonstrating a massive and orchestrated level of fraud.
For example in Michigan, eyewitnesses gave testimony of massive mail-in ballot irregularities and outright fraud while hundreds of sworn affidavits of such activities were likewise presented as evidence:
VIDEO LINK: Eyewitness Accounts Of Michigan Voter Fraud…
Yet the MSM largely focused on one witness because of her hairdo, mannerisms and accent, ignoring the many other testimonies given under penalty of perjury:
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
m not shocked you don't understand that meme and how it relates to my posts. Not one bit.
Considering I wrote the text that I made into the memes that came from a post of mine here on TD, I'm not shocked to see you're once again about as wrong as one could be.
The myriad downvotes from others who correctly identify your jackassery is gravy.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:18 am to OceanMan
quote:
Was this error only for presidential votes?
No, but in the paradigm of the CTs and partisanship, it doesn't really make a distinction. You're just expanding the potential risk the DEMs created without producing any additional benefits.
quote:
The vote tabulations were not signed off on.
That's not an entirely accurate way to describe things. The scanners zero reports weren't signed off on.
There are other ways to validate the total vote counts, which were done.
quote:
The benefit is they won elections.
How, exactly? This added no votes for them. This took no votes from Republicans.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:19 am to Great Plains Drifter
quote:this dude goes from muh evidence to well it didn't really make much difference without batting an eyelash. Zero intellectual honesty. Zero integrity. Zero shame. You hate to see it
The way you gloss over the fact that DJT “could have won GA”.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Notice how the thread has gotten quieter when they've been asked to answer questions about what actually happened.
He posted a tweet from a known RINO that lost his primary because of it.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:19 am to loogaroo
quote:
How can anybody believe that something is legit, when you have this many breaks in the chain of custody?”
Preach!
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:19 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Considering I wrote the text that I made into the memes that came from a post of mine here on TD
That's what makes your inability to understand your own meme that much funnier
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:20 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
this dude goes from muh evidence to well it didn't really make much difference without batting an eyelash.
Again, no. That did not happen.
I even specifically addressed the fraud allegations by noting how they had no overlap with this story.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:21 am to loogaroo
quote:
How can anybody believe that something is legit, when you have this many breaks in the chain of custody?
You realize they can count the total votes in other ways, right?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
STATIST MO FO
They got caught so pervasiveky that they even have to admit it now. Yet, this dude is still trying to carry water for these crooks.
I have a new nickname for you, sfp.
Baghdad Boob
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Seriously these people think this story claims 315k fraudulent votes were cast for Biden, or something.
No. these people think the votes counts were not credible, because they weren't. They think the "investigations" in Fulton county were not conclusive, because they weren't.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:25 am to SlowFlowPro
Don’t forget the eventual: it happened, we did it, and it was a good thing!
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote: How can anybody believe that something is legit, when you have this many breaks in the chain of custody?
You realize they can count the total votes in other ways, right?
Sure... skip count, double count, half count, multiply... who knows? There weren't the safeguards in place to be ASSURED of anything.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:26 am to OceanMan
quote:
these people think the votes counts were not credible, because they weren't.
How does this story establish that?
Again, the clerks fricked up. Nobody is denying that.
But the vote totals were validated, because the system is built to be able to do so. If the vote totals on the non-signed machines match all the other data, explain the credibility issues.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:31 am to loogaroo
Why is it anytime Trump loses at something it is 'rigged' 'stolen' 'fraud' 'hoax' etc?
Do you MAGA morons not remember when Trump claimed the Iowa Caucus was 'rigged' when he lost to Ted Cruz? 
Does anyone on here really believe that?
Do you MAGA morons not remember when Trump claimed the Iowa Caucus was 'rigged' when he lost to Ted Cruz?
Does anyone on here really believe that?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:32 am to loogaroo
And RINOs Kemp and Ratfricker stood by with fingers in a certain orifice the whole time
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Due to the clerical error, Trump could have won GA. It would not have swung the election, though.
How many “clerical errors” occurred in other states that we don’t know about?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:33 am to deltaland
It's been 5 years under intense scrutiny and they've found one.
Page 6 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News