re: Fulton County admits they did not follow the rules.

Nope. Not even close.


“Now, some people are saying that as a result, all ballots tabulated by those scanners are fraudulent.

But this ignores a few things:

1) Those receipts and "zero reports" are still available and they reconcile.

2) Georgia also did reconciliations of the number of check-ins at each voting location with the number of ballots tabulated at each voting location.

3) Georgia did multiple full recounts of all ballots. This would have revealed if any scanner/tabulator double counted any ballots. They did not.

4) None of the current allegations prove a single fraudulent check-in or ballot scan.

Accordingly, it is silly to think that a CLERICAL OVERSIGHT somehow invalidates the reconciled ballots of 300,000+ ballots.

This of course would never hold up in a court of law.”

quote:

---

Had this come out on or before Jan. 6th, pressure would have been much greater for more investigation.

---

To even suggest looking into election procedures was to he labeled an “election denier,” “undemocratic,” and a “nut” during those days.

quote:

---

To even suggest looking into election procedures was to he labeled an “election denier,” “undemocratic,” and a “nut” during those days.

---

They were trying to destroy anyone who spoke out.

quote:

---

SlowFlowPro

---

Lie harder.

quote:

---

To win.

---

I don't think you understand what happened here if you think losing 6-figures (net) in votes for Biden increased their chance of winning

quote:

---

Due to the clerical error, Trump could have won GA. It would not have swung the election, though.

---

quote:

---

I'm not shocked you don't understand that meme and how it relates to my posts. Not one bit.

---

You are such an insufferable twat.

quote:

---

What do you think the impact on the election was, exactly? What benefit do you think occurred?

---

Was this error only for presidential votes?

quote:

---

This could have been disastrous for DEMs. Do you really think they did this on purpose elsewhere to get no benefit and possibly lose elections?

---

The vote tabulations were not signed off on. The missing signatures indicate a lack of attestation that they are legitimate. The benefit is they won elections.

I guess these signatures aren't "safeguards"

quote:

---

Twitter grifters and their stupid followers not understanding the law is irrelevant. I know it FEELS like this matters but sadly it doesn’t.

---

Well…

quote:

---

Georgia’s election regulations require each polling location to produce two transcription tapes, one before polls open and the other after they close. The first tape verifies that the polling machines started at a ballot count of zero (meaning any data from a previous election or sample data from a test had been erased). The second tape includes the final count of ballots cast, as well as the tally of the votes. Georgia requires each tape to be certified by the signatures of three poll workers. “I just don’t understand how one could even provide a canvas document to say, here are the tabulators, and here are the votes, and these add up to X numbers for the election,” Johnston added. The best defense Fulton County can offer is that they once had all the records, and then subsequently lost them, in which case their only fault is abysmal record-keeping. But, since they lost the records, it’s impossible to say for certain whether the missing records were tampered with, falsified, or — as Cross’s evidence suggests — full of errors. Brumbaugh protested that “Fulton County has spent hours and hours, probably days and weeks searching [for] this stuff. They’ve provided what they can.” In fact, Fulton County spent so much time tracking down information that should have been stored in one convenient place that Cross’s public records request cost him more than $15,000. “These are not clerical errors,” insisted Cross. “They are catastrophic breaks in chain of custody and verification. Because no tape was ever legally certified, Fulton County had no lawful authority to certify its advanced voting results to the Secretary of State. Yet, it did. And Secretary Raffensperger accepted and folded those uncertified numbers into Georgia’s official total without questioning them.” “This case is one of the most egregious things I’ve seen,” exclaimed SEB executive director James Mills. “It’s this kind of junk — and that’s a nice word — that violates our whole system. How can anybody believe that something is legit, when you have this many breaks in the chain of custody?”

---

https://washingtonstand.com/article/315000-georgia-votes-lacked-certifying-signatures-in-2020-election-records-show