- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fulton County admits they did not follow the rules.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:24 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:24 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Regardless, for example, after a GA 2022 primary, initial DVS machine results showed zero Election Day votes for a candidate, Michelle Long Spears, in all but seven precincts — including in her own precinct where she knew she and her husband had voted.
OH frick
quote:
An initial machine recount, as with the 2020 processes, generated an identical result --- zero votes in all but seven precincts. Eventually a "programming error" was identified. When corrected, Spears won the election. There were numerous issues with the Raffensperger recounts in 2020.
*ETA: the safeguards in the 2022 election were the...recounts.
Why would recounts not be hte same in 2020?
You know less of those details than you should
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 7:26 am
0
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're conflating the clerical error with "fraud"
A couple of tapes is a clerical error. A large number of tapes representing hundreds of thousands of votes is not a clerical error.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:33 am to SG_Geaux
quote:
A couple of tapes is a clerical error. A large number of tapes representing hundreds of thousands of votes is not a clerical error.
Then what is it, exactly? It's not fraud.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Government workers are a particular kind of idiot, is my best guess
So it’s ok that there’s an accountability gap across 315k votes?
I don’t believe anyone is saying that 315k votes were invented out of thin air, but this combined with what else we know about Fulton, including Fulton’s refusal to be transparent with ballot images in 2025 despite state law
https://www.ajc.com/politics/fulton-county-refuses-to-provide-all-2020-ballots-despite-new-georgia-law/MGUAISQTAFDPXCUB7XSS33Z47A/
Means people are rightfully distrustful of results.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 7:35 am
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:37 am to G2160
quote:
So it’s ok that there’s an accountability gap across 315k votes?
Who said that? Now you're pivoting and changing the discussion.
The elections officials should be reprimanded at a minimum and fined heavily in a more equitable punishment.
Saying there weren't any actual impacts on legitimate votes is not the same thing as saying it was "OK".
quote:
I don’t believe anyone is saying that 315k votes were invented out of thin air,
I'd take that bet.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
However, this error doesn't indicate the type of fraud oft-referenced in "The Steal"
Wrong as always.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yes, this has been discussed about 10x on here. Due to the clerical error, Trump could have won GA. It would not have swung the election, though. However, this error doesn't indicate the type of fraud oft-referenced in "The Steal" I just summarized the story/discussion in 2 sentences.
This happened all over the country.
The 2020 election was stolen.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:46 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
The Steal"
Wrong as always.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:51 am to Stidham8
quote:
This happened all over the country.
Democrats put Biden's victory in jeopardy all over the country?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Can you describe how chain of custody specifically applies, or is a particular concern, to this story about the 315k votes?
quote:
If there is no record of whether the tabulator was set at zero at the start of polling, there is no way of telling whether ballots from a previous election (or ballots from a test run) were left on the memory card and might later be counted. Notably, this happened in Montana, where officials discovered more votes than were cast and believe the votes were leftover sample data that had not been cleared. “These signed tapes are the sole legal certification that the reported totals are authentic,” Cross told the SEB at the Dec. 9 hearing. “Fulton County produced zero signed tabulator tapes in early voting.”
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:06 am to loogaroo
quote:
If there is no record of whether the tabulator was set at zero at the start of polling, there is no way of telling whether ballots from a previous election (or ballots from a test run) were left on the memory card and might later be counted.
There is a way, and it was done. Multiple times.
Chain of custody had no relevance to that process.
quote:
“These signed tapes are the sole legal certification that the reported totals are authentic,” Cross told the SEB at the Dec. 9
Cross was either being intentionally dishonest, is dumb, or is ignorant.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Due to the clerical error,
Clerical errors that result in states going to the wrong Presidential candidate(and most certainly swinging a Senate race should result in decades in prison for anyone remotely involved
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Trump could have won GA. It would not have swung the election, though.
It’s as if you are completely disregarding what everyone saw play out in real time on election night. We saw this EXACT same scenario play out in multiple states at the exact same time. Even better is the talking heads and dems on television discussing a scenario months in advance where we go to bed thinking DJT is the winner but come morning time Biden will be the president elect. So not only did it happen, it happened exactly like they said it would happy. Take your BuT iT diDN’t SWinG tHE ElEctION non sense and forcefully place it up your arse. You were wrong then. You are wrong today and you will be wrong for eternity.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:16 am to scottydoesntknow
quote:
Clerical errors that result in states going to the wrong Presidential candidate(and most certainly swinging a Senate race should result in decades in prison for anyone remotely involved
It hasn't even been determined that this issue would invalidate the votes (hence "could" being used in my initial post)
These were valid, legal votes but-for this error. I think y'all are trying to spin them into invalid, fraudulent votes.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There is a way, and it was done. Multiple times.
shite in = shite out
They weren’t zeroed out. You can count and recount the ballots to infinity with the same results, but there’s no way to tell what was loaded on the tabulators and supplemented.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
These were valid, legal votes but-for this error. I think y'all are trying to spin them into invalid, fraudulent votes.
They are invalid per the law.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It would not have swung the election, though.
they cheate dtheir asses off in AZ, Wi, MI and PA
fn moron
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:24 am to loogaroo
quote:
They weren’t zeroed out. You can count and recount the ballots to infinity with the same results, but there’s no way to tell what was loaded on the tabulators and supplemented.
Precisely.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:25 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:30 am to VoxDawg
It’s probably been covered already in this thread that I haven’t started really.
It’s probably been covered already in this thread that I haven’t started really.
The tabulation software has zero audit trail.
It also includes the ability to “adjudicate” a ballot that doesn’t auto adjudicate, Create a ballot to match the ballot that has been adjudicated and Print it out.
I suspect it’s possible to do that in batch processing. Meaning, I could create a database file of what votes should look like, randomized enough to follow certain patterns, but not give away the fraud upfront, replace ballots that didn’t auto adjudicate with the batch database file and print out ballots to match the adjudicated ballots created from the file. Then what does the recount count?
It’s probably been covered already in this thread that I haven’t started really.
The tabulation software has zero audit trail.
It also includes the ability to “adjudicate” a ballot that doesn’t auto adjudicate, Create a ballot to match the ballot that has been adjudicated and Print it out.
I suspect it’s possible to do that in batch processing. Meaning, I could create a database file of what votes should look like, randomized enough to follow certain patterns, but not give away the fraud upfront, replace ballots that didn’t auto adjudicate with the batch database file and print out ballots to match the adjudicated ballots created from the file. Then what does the recount count?
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 9:32 am
Page 13 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News