- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Foreign-Born Judge Controls Trump’s National Security Powers
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:18 am to CapnKangaroo
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:18 am to CapnKangaroo
quote:
Show me the law that says POTUS can’t revoke a security clearance for any reason he sees fit please.
Having had a clearance for 40 plus years, you are correct. The president is the soul arbitrator of what is classified and who has access to it. Of course, that authority is delegated for simplicity, but at the end of the day POTUS can declassify and revoke access as he sees fit. frick any judge that thinks different.
This post was edited on 12/25/25 at 1:36 pm
1
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:19 am to Godfather1
quote:Except that he IS a US citizen. He was naturalized years ago.
Born in Ontario. One of them scary Canucks.quote:
Still not an American
quote:Trump is irrelevant to the (silly-assed) assertion that this judge is not a US citizen.
If you can’t see a problem with that, Hank, your TDS has you farther gone than I thought.
Now, if you want to debate the question of creating a second (and lower) class of citizenship for US citizens who are naturalized rather than native-born, I suppose you can do that. It is a disgusting notion, but feel free to make the argument.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:21 am to dalefla
quote:You are mistaken. See the citations above. Even regarding classification/clearance, POTUS is bound by the US Constitution.
Having had a clearance for 40 plus years, you are correct. The president is the soul arbitrator of what is classified and who has access to it. Of course, that authority is delegated for simplicity, but at the end of the day put us can declassify and revoke access as he sees fit. frick any judge that thinks different.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:21 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
No, just the JUDICIAL power to require the Executive to follow the law in its actions.
So he ruled Trump's order stands but made Trump promise to dot I's and cross T's going forward?
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:21 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
In the US Constitution and our system of laws? Abso-fricking-lutely.
Funny… I bet the word “constitution” never came out of your mouth during the Biden admin.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:23 am to David_DJS
quote:No. Explaind above. In short, SURPRISE, even Donald Trump is bound by the US Constitution. I know that just kills you.
So he ruled Trump's order stands but made Trump promise to dot I's and cross T's going forward?
This post was edited on 12/25/25 at 11:24 am
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:30 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
I know that just kills you.
You don't know much.
quote:
Explaind above. In short, SURPRISE, even Donald Trump is bound by the US Constitution.
And federal judges have never overstepped their authority?
Could it be you're more a judiciary cultist than I am a Trumpian?
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:30 am to Bourre
quote:
PedoHank defending leftist judges on Christmas Day
No one is surprised
I don't know if it's Hank, but he makes up conversations in threads between his alters as well.
Relentless and Retired tiger or that other troll that showed up in October.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:33 am to OchoDedos
quote:
A non Citizen Federal Judge
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:34 am to David_DJS
quote:Sure they have. But here is the thing. There are safeguards in the Judicial Branch, in the form of higher courts. By contrasts, there are few (if any) such safeguards within the Executive Branch. The only effective check on abuse by the Executive IS the Judiciary.
And federal judges have never overstepped their authority? Could it be you're more a judiciary cultist than I am a Trumpian?
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:36 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
I was making a very general observation about how these cases normally arise. I’ve not read this specific opinion, and I do not plan to do so, because it simply doesn’t interest me that much.
Probably because it shits all over your moronic deflections.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:37 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
When the Libs of TikTok stuck to reposting stupid posts by Libs, it was harmless and entertaining.
For the last few years, it has become a source of affirmative disinformation, such as the implication that this judge is not a US citizen ("foreigner judge").
For the last few years, it has become a source of affirmative disinformation, such as the implication that this judge is not a US citizen ("foreigner judge").
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:37 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
While the merits of any individual security clearance decision are unreviewable
Thanks, you answered your own argument!
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:38 am to Louisianalabguy
quote:Were you dropped on your head as an infant ... repeatedly?
While the merits of any individual security clearance decision are unreviewablequote:
Thanks, you answered your own argument!
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:39 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Ignore the ruling. Deport the judge.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:42 am to ole man
quote:
if your not a natural born citizen of the US you should not be a able to run for any office oeriod
Constitution says otherwise. Only office of president must be American born
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:42 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Sure they have. But here is the thing. There are safeguards in the Judicial Branch, in the form of higher courts. By contrasts, there are few (if any) such safeguards within the Executive Branch. The only effective check on abuse by the Executive IS the Judiciary.
So? Safeguards against procedural error or missteps?
You're arguing a federal bench can usurp executive authority on a national security matter because of lack of procedural adherence, and if I'm not mistaken the procedure isn't codified but simply precedence. And you're arguing that's constitutional and there's no other option. That sounds kind of cultish.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:43 am to tigeraddict
quote:The Constitution is not an important variable in any analysis conducted by a Trumpist.quote:Constitution says otherwise. Only office of president must be American born
if your not a natural born citizen of the US you should not be a able to run for any office oeriod
Posted on 12/25/25 at 11:50 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
The idea that Trump can exercise his Constitutional authority only by following the procedures of Congress and the courts is retarded.
The democult wants any conservative POTUS to conduct policy at the speed of a deadlocked congress and a prejudiced judicial branch. Everything they do is to toss sand into the gearbox so they can campaign on "NOTHING GOT ACCOMPLISHED!!" in the midterm congressional election.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 12:06 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
The only effective check on abuse by the Executive IS the Judiciary.
Why are lawyers so terrible at civics?
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News