- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ford’s ex BF has submitted sworn testimony indicating ford lied under oath
Posted on 10/3/18 at 5:05 am to PJinAtl
Posted on 10/3/18 at 5:05 am to PJinAtl
I’ve not really read it. But, isn’t this letter supposed to refute her statement about talking to someone regarding polygraph?
If so, how could it possibly have been written until AFTER her testimony? So, it would have to be post hearing.
If so, how could it possibly have been written until AFTER her testimony? So, it would have to be post hearing.
3
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:03 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
It was probably "standard" questioning, or at least directed to the fact she and her team were relying upon the polygraph in the media kkand the Dems were harping on it).
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:10 am to genro
quote:
She needs to come clean, name names. Who put her up to it, who paid her off. Give her immunity and witness protection
FIFY
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:25 am to teke184
quote:
his would be one of the reasons why I said the FBI refusing to interview her may be a bad thing... it means they have enough to get her on something.
She’s not the one being investigated. Investigation is limited in scope.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:43 am to RogerThis
Take this new revelation with a lot of salt.
But I remember that question at the hearing. And there being no follow up. I’d be curious if this guy didn’t talk to the GOP ahead of time.
If they knew with proof she was lying early, that’d be awesome.
But I remember that question at the hearing. And there being no follow up. I’d be curious if this guy didn’t talk to the GOP ahead of time.
If they knew with proof she was lying early, that’d be awesome.
This post was edited on 10/3/18 at 6:44 am
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:56 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
It was stated well before the hearing that she had taken a polygraph.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 7:04 am to Sus-Scrofa
quote:
Take this new revelation with a lot of salt.
But I remember that question at the hearing. And there being no follow up. I’d be curious if this guy didn’t talk to the GOP ahead of time.
If they knew with proof she was lying early, that’d be awesome.
Wtf is this shite? Why must we start with the assumption that Ford is being truthful, and be skeptical of everyone else? Why might Fords ex be working with the GOP but Ford can’t possibly be working with Dems - even though she’s surrounded by an entire team of dem loyalist attorneys? My goodness.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 7:04 am to RogerThis
quote:
She’s not the one being investigated. Investigation is limited in scope.
You don’t know how investigations work do you?
Posted on 10/3/18 at 7:11 am to gthog61
He’s the source police. He offers no substance. He only questions the source without having the slightest understanding of how sources work.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 7:16 am to scrooster
quote:I doubt they're that reliable.
He says the current test is almost impossible to defeat, even by the best liars. The machines are fine tuned and so advanced they pick up every little tell
Posted on 10/3/18 at 7:28 am to RogerThis
quote:
She’s not the one being investigated. Investigation is limited in scope.
Wrong. Rapehoaxer is going down, maybe to prison.
Liberal deprogramming facilities are being set up as we speak.
You’ll be getting a visit soon.
Soon.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 7:34 am to scrooster
quote:
The number one polygraph guy in the country resides right here in SC. He works for GPN and trains people within their org. He says the current test is almost impossible to defeat, even by the best liars. The machines are fine tuned and so advanced they pick up every little tell.
That sounds like a sales pitch to me. No way the guy getting paid to train people would tell anyone that the test isn't reliable.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 7:38 am to RD Dawg
quote:
Odds you won't hear about this on ABC,NBC,CBS,CNN and MSNBC within the next 24 hours?
Wasn't on ABC GMA in the first segment -- 99.9999% sure it won't be on ANY segment.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 7:49 am to tiger91
quote:
Wasn't on ABC GMA in the first segment -- 99.9999% sure it won't be on ANY segment
Go to the cnn website, first article trump may have not been self made billionaire. An article on the GOP strategy to confirm KAV, an article on the NYT article about loud drinkers. Nothing on ex boyfriend.
This post was edited on 10/3/18 at 7:49 am
Posted on 10/3/18 at 7:58 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Well, there goes all credibility.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 8:07 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
It doesn't matter Dems have played this perfectly. If anyone publicly calls this woman a liar they will be pounced on as attacking rape victims, never mind the fact that Ford isn't a rape victim.
It's yet another example of Dems and their do as I say not as I do philosophy. Hilarious that HIllary Clinton of all people is going on about questioning the honestly of women who claim to have been sexually assaulted.
It's yet another example of Dems and their do as I say not as I do philosophy. Hilarious that HIllary Clinton of all people is going on about questioning the honestly of women who claim to have been sexually assaulted.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 8:08 am to tiger91
It’s bizzarro world. One rando said that Kav got hammered in college on a TV interview and the media screeched “perjury” in unison for days, even though it didn’t contradict Kavs testimony in any way.
Here we have sworn testimony from someone extremely close to Ford saying she actually committed perjury and they won’t even mention it.
Here we have sworn testimony from someone extremely close to Ford saying she actually committed perjury and they won’t even mention it.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 8:11 am to Jon Ham
quote:
Your source is a twitterer who doesn’t cite her source. We need further confirmation.
#IBelieveFordLied
and I don't need any proof. The seriousness of the allegation should be enough to derail her testimony.
He said. She said. She said.
We can play this game all day and all night.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 8:14 am to dcbl
quote:
what willl CNN have to say about this?
Nothing. NBC seems to have missed this news item. This morning it's Trump said mean things and his daddy might have used questionable tax stratigies.
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News