- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: For Anybody Here Who Thinks the ICE Agent Acted Wrongly, Tell Me What He Should've Done
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:30 pm to wackatimesthree
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:30 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
You could, and people did. Plenty of them.
But it was in really terrible taste, and some people's employer's didn't want to be associated with people posting things in terrible taste.
Which is their right as employers.
You can say anything you want that stops short of slander, or inciting violence, etc. But you aren't free from the consequences of your speech.
Usually publicly being a classless a-hole has consequences.
Pretty astute observations and remarks there. Of course if you’re having to explain that to another “grown” individual then you’re probably wasting your time in the first place. Same scenario on this board with the whole “you’re not allowed to negatively criticize Trump.” The people who say that ironically fail to grasp that, while yes, it’s perfectly acceptable to negatively criticize Trump whenever and however one wishes, on the exact same side of the coin it’s also perfectly acceptable for someone else to criticize the criticism.
Some folks believe, many folks even, jump out there with quite strong opinions and criticisms and observations, and so confidently and proudly, yet very, very obviously have only thought it out halfway, if that.
Anyhoo, I suppose I had best put the kibosh on myself here before I really get off in the weeds. And nobody needs to see that happen. There could be children around. Lol
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:30 pm to Patato Salad
quote:
You seem triggered.
Haha. I laugh at morons like you.
This is entertainment for me.
Speaking of entertainment, how did you celebrate the murder of Charlie Kirk?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:31 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
That is what the jury is going to say, too.
And where is this trial taking place?
You’ve watched the NYT video but have you seen the video from the ICE agent’s phone?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:31 pm to Patato Salad
quote:
I prayed.
What, for more conservatives to be murdered?
Your ilk is vile, and violent.
Own it.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:33 pm to Patato Salad
quote:
Posted by Patato Salad
frick off back to Reddit commie scum.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:36 pm to TS1926
quote:
frick off back to Reddit commie scum.
quote:
Patato Salad
Let it stay. Every time it refuses to answer a question, it exposes itself as being nothing more than a mindless drone.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:37 pm to KCT
quote:
Tell Me What He Should've Done
Not shoot a mother 3 times in the head as she’s fleeing the scene.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:45 pm to FoTownBam
quote:
Not shoot a mother 3 times in the head as she’s fleeing the scene.
Shhh.
The adults are talking.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:46 pm to wackatimesthree
You think you’re one of the adults? You have no understanding of the law.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:46 pm to The Pickwick
quote:
Probably shoot her tires out or let her leave would have been the two better options.
Nice. This is the vehicular equivalent of: Why didn't you shoot the gun out of their hand?!?!
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:46 pm to FoTownBam
quote:
Not shoot a mother 3 times in the head as she’s fleeing the scene.
False premise.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:48 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You think you’re one of the adults?
Yes.
quote:
You have no understanding of the law.
Nor have I argued from the law, have I? I've asked questions and based on the answers I may have agued inside what others have posted, but other than that, show me where I have argued the law from my own knowledge.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:50 pm to cssamerican
quote:
. It’s likely she did not intentionally try to run over an officer, while the officer believed she was in that moment.
agree with this, but as you know, intent is irrelevant.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:51 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
The officer is cooked and I don’t believe this is the hill America First’ers should die on.
Cant really abandon the law like that.
Self defense law is a thing, especially for LEO. All the elements of a successful self defense legal defense is there.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:52 pm to Smeg
quote:
Are you stupid enough to think shooting the tires of a vehicle 6 inches away from you is going to disable it?
Yeah they are that stupid.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:53 pm to FoTownBam
quote:
Not shoot a mother 3 times in the head as she’s fleeing the scene.
You would be dumb to NOT shoot at a person accelerating in your direction.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:07 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
From a different angle, it looks VERY unlikely that the vehicle struck the officer. From the officer's own camera, we cannot even see enough to form an opinion.
Really, can't see (and hear) enough from the LEO's vid? A six year old kid could tell the LEO was struck. And using all caps does not make your point(s) stronger btw. Just a trademark you have that shows you are a banned poster slinking by using an alter.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:10 pm to Clark14
Clark, you poor dumb sonofabitch
Cars are inanimate objects. He wasn’t trying to stop an object. He was trying to stop a threat. The crazed lunatic bitch with her “wife”
, coaching her,
“DRIVE, BABY, DRIVE
was the threat. The threat was neutralized.
She gets to live knowing her last words to her “wife” was the command that led to her death.
quote:
Do you think blowing her head off was the best way to stop the vehicle when he was clearly out of harms way? His actions only accelerated the vehicle and left it unattended.
Cars are inanimate objects. He wasn’t trying to stop an object. He was trying to stop a threat. The crazed lunatic bitch with her “wife”
“DRIVE, BABY, DRIVE
was the threat. The threat was neutralized.
She gets to live knowing her last words to her “wife” was the command that led to her death.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:10 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:Here ya go junior. Tell me what you think.
frick your blind link you goose-stepping piece of shite.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:15 pm to AquaAg84
Not shot the dumb bitch.. Y’all don’t understand how this kind of bullshite will make it 10x more difficult to actually deport the illegals? All these fricks are up in arms now all across the country. This just fricked us. Be smarter.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Popular
Back to top


0




