Started By
Message

Flu Has Disappeared Worldwide during COVID (updated: back)

Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:06 pm
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11089 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:06 pm
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/flu-has-disappeared-worldwide-during-the-covid-pandemic/

quote:

Flu Has Disappeared Worldwide during the COVID Pandemic

The public health measures that slow the spread of the novel coronavirus work really well on influenza

By Katie Peek on April 29, 2021



quote:

Since the novel coronavirus began its global spread, influenza cases reported to the World Health Organization have dropped to minuscule levels. The reason, epidemiologists think, is that the public health measures taken to keep the coronavirus from spreading also stop the flu. Influenza viruses are transmitted in much the same way as SARS-CoV-2, but they are less effective at jumping from host to host.


Works for the flu, but not covid

quote:

As Scientific American reported last fall, the drop-off in flu numbers was both swift and universal. Since then, cases have stayed remarkably low. “There’s just no flu circulating,” says Greg Poland, who has studied the disease at the Mayo Clinic for decades. The U.S. saw about 600 deaths from influenza during the 2020-2021 flu season. In comparison, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated there were roughly 22,000 deaths in the prior season and 34,000 two seasons ago.




quote:

ecause each year’s flu vaccine is based on strains that have been circulating during the past year, it is unclear how next year’s vaccine will fare, should the typical patterns of the disease return. The WHO made its flu strain recommendations for vaccines in late February as usual, but they were based on far fewer cases than in a common year. At the same time, with fewer virus particles circulating in the world, there is less chance of an upcoming mutation, so it is possible the 2021–2022 vaccine will prove extra effective.


Record "lows", but lets still plug product



No other alternative hypothesis for this abberant data???

Part of the Edifice Complex:

Erosion of trust in entities (religion, government and now "science" better termed "political scientism")
This post was edited on 12/31/21 at 7:10 pm
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101382 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:07 pm to
Do viral strains compete against each other?
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
8880 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:07 pm to
Trump cured flu.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
53260 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:07 pm to
"Why is there no flu?"
"We wore masks."
"Why didn't that work on corona?"
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89509 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:08 pm to
Ain't that peculiar?

Since COVID is definitely NOT a really bad flu strain *winkwink*, but it wiped out the flu, huh?

Weird.
Posted by blackrose890
Fayetteville, AR
Member since Apr 2009
6315 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:17 pm to
I swear some of you have the medical knowledge of a turnip. You can't confuse a Coronavirus for an Orthomyxovirus. The capsid is radically different, the spike proteins are radically different, and the nuclear material is entire the other way around and doesn't share much in its sequence.
Posted by EuphoricSSP
Member since Feb 2021
822 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

I swear some of you have the medical knowledge of a turnip. You can't confuse a Coronavirus for an Orthomyxovirus. The capsid is radically different, the spike proteins are radically different, and the nuclear material is entire the other way around and doesn't share much in its sequence.



Just to be clear though, why do you think Flu rates are 'down'?
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
59816 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:21 pm to
It's a miracle!

ETA - Not to mention, it's almost as if any regular flu strain would trip a generic coronavirus test, since you'd be much more concerned about that than just the plain ol' flu during a pandemic. Why, that would send coronavirus cases through the roof!
This post was edited on 4/30/21 at 1:24 pm
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
10287 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:27 pm to
Covid kills flu bugs and the obese
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162217 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Since COVID is definitely NOT a really bad flu strain *winkwink*, but it wiped out the flu, huh?


Not what the article is saying

It's your dumb imagination that made that leap
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
26780 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

"Why is there no flu?"
"We wore masks."
"Why didn't that work on corona?"


Don't you see how many more people would have died if we weren't wearing masks? Millions!!!!!!
Posted by wareaglepete
Lumon Industries
Member since Dec 2012
10968 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:41 pm to
Posted by blackrose890
Fayetteville, AR
Member since Apr 2009
6315 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:42 pm to
Because the viral loaded needed for infection from the flu is higher, the window for infection is lower, the immune system is better equipped to fight the flu. The list goes on and on, but my guess is that nothing I say will change your mind. My M.D. is probably worthless to you.
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11089 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:44 pm to
Let us not forget (from prior related thread)

Our overlords are not subtle...

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/one-hour-after-biden-inaugurated-who-changes-covid-testing-criteria?utm_source=top_news&utm_campaign=catholic

quote:

One hour after Biden inaugurated, WHO changes COVID testing criteria
The change is expected to lead to a reduction in COVID case tallies.
Fri Jan 22, 2021 - 6:13 am EST[/quote

[quote]In what some have suggested is politicized timing, the World Health Organization on Wednesday changed the protocol for COVID-19 tests, which will result in large reductions in the numbers of positive cases. The body took this action just one hour after Joe Biden was sworn in as president of the United States. On Wednesday, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued guidance regarding the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, which is being widely used across the globe in order to detect cases of COVID-19. In a short information notice, the WHO referred back to an instruction booklet for COVID testing, released in September 2020, noting that “careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed.”


Clown world..


quote:

The guidance warned against diagnosing someone as having the virus just because he tests positive if he does not present with symptoms of COVID-19. It also warned about the high risk of false positives: “The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.” “As disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases. The probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity,” the WHO continued. An even more surprising admission followed: the document described PCR tests merely as an “aid for diagnosis” and did not place any greater weight upon the results of PCR tests. “Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.”

The new guidance for assessing the results of PCR COVID tests effectively means that there are additional steps to be taken before reporting that someone has tested positive for the virus. The WHO notes that “a new specimen should be taken and retested” and further stipulates that “health care” workers should weigh up the test result alongside real-world information, such as symptoms or “clinical observations,” and contact with any other infected individuals.


WHO is owned by Baal Gates and China...

Been saying this was a “number fricking” for some time...
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/politics/covid-19-misunderstandings-in-statistics-ascertainment-bias-more-testing-more-cases/89042873/

quote:

Covid 19: misunderstandings in statistics, ascertainment bias (more testing= more "cases")Posted on 3/13/20 at 8:46 pm


fricked by complexity/“data”...

Above
Election
SM cultural editing




Big tech (planned obsolescense)

—-

PS:

Lockdowns don’t work (Stanford study)
Vitamin D is massively underrated with COVID (and in general by the populace due to modernity)


"Breathe"

Breathe, breathe in the air
Don't be afraid to care
Leave, don't leave me
Look around, choose your own ground

Long you live and high you fly
Smiles you'll give and tears you'll cry
And all you touch and all you see
Is all your life will ever be

Run, rabbit, run
Dig that hole, forget the sun
When at last the work is done
Don't sit down, it's time to dig another one

Long you live and high you fly
But only if you ride the tide
Balanced on the biggest wave
Race towards an early grave




Breathe the air - frick lockdowns
Forget the sun (vit D), forget the Son...

Most just go along with things they are told (ride that tide...)
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37263 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:44 pm to
If it saves just one life....

Except flu deaths, we've never really cared about those.
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11089 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

cycle threshold (Ct


Good background on false positives that can occur with extended cycle thresholds on PCR

False positive = test positive, but lack symptoms and/or the disease

https://cormandrostenreview.com/false-positives-consequences/

quote:

The consequences of false positives

Guest-Article by Howard Steen & Saji Hameed


quote:

PART 1 – BACKGROUND (HOWARD STEEN)

It seemed in January that the world was facing an impending epidemic caused by a deadly new virus and that a swift response based on inevitably limited data was of the utmost importance to avert a potential global catastrophe. One of the most important tools in this fight to detect, isolate and suppress the virus is the PCR test. The Charité Institute of Berlin led by Prof. Drosten was quick to recognise the extreme seriousness of the situation and developed the first PCR test protocol to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus in record time. This was simultaneously selected and recommended by the WHO and became the global first line of defense.

Eleven months into the pandemic we have now learned much more about the virus and the multitude of PCR test variants made possible by the Corman-Drosten protocol. Flaws in the test protocol have become increasingly clear and our review report addresses these tremendous concerns.

Additionally alarming, and especially pertinent to this argument, as the PCR test has impacted all levels of global society as perhaps no test has ever done before, are the unforeseen consequences caused by the rise in PCR cases. Over one hundred governments have used these results to apply unprecedented measures to control transmission; such as lockdowns which have irreparably impacted millions of lives and livelihoods and direct attacks on people’s basic rights and personal freedoms, further resulting in catastrophic damages for entire economies.



TPA speculation:

Many covid case were PCR false positives (inflating case numbers). Many covid cases could have been influenza if testing was not performed for influencza or priority was given to a a PCR test at an elevated cycle threshold calling covid.

Clinically, the patient with influenza would look very similar to a person with a mild covid case

The person interpretting the test would have a financial incentive (at an institutional level/reimbursement) to label the case covid over influenza...

The "ethical" way of skirting this would be setting up freestanding sites only searching only for covid...

Seek and you shall find...

To be clear: the virus and impact on some is not a hoax. The machinations surrounding it and policies are exploits
This post was edited on 4/30/21 at 1:59 pm
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16367 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 1:55 pm to
How would the flu levels "dropping to minuscule levels" affect the flu virus going forward. Could the levels ever get low enough to the point that it would be essentially non-existent?
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
24002 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

My M.D. is probably worthless to you.


For treating patients, no, but for conducting and reporting actual science...probably. An MD doesn’t automatically make one a good scientist.



Surely, you’ve read about viral interference by now, and looked at worldwide data trends for SARS 2.0, flu, other HCoVs, rhinovirus, etc. to see how they all virtually disappeared when SARS rates were high but rebounded when SARS cooled down?

Japan masks every year for flu, and I believe pushed hard for it in 2019. Why did it only work this past year?


Or how about in Brazil? Low CoviD mitigation implementation there and yet flu still disappeared:


fricking wild!

But it must be those masks!
This post was edited on 5/3/21 at 9:42 am
Posted by wareaglepete
Lumon Industries
Member since Dec 2012
10968 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 2:17 pm to
Just want to insure I’m taking what you are saying correctly, as I am but a simple caveman. Are you saying the masks are why we are seeing virtually no flu?
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
17886 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Surely, you’ve read about viral interference by now, and looked at worldwide data trends for SARS 2.0, flu, other HCoVs, rhinovirus, etc. to see how they all virtually disappeared when SARS rates were high but rebounded with SARS cooled down?

Japan masks every year for flu, and I believe pushed hard for it in 2019. Why did it only work this past year?

Please. He's an M.D. And we all know medical doctors know not only medicine, but all forms of science, politics and even economics. Thank God they stepped in to run the country a year ago or imagine what a shitshow we'd have become.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram