- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Florida To Begin Sentencing Pedophiles to Death – Democrats Outraged
Posted on 1/29/23 at 11:56 am to SOSFAN
Posted on 1/29/23 at 11:56 am to SOSFAN
quote:That is a very strange (and shallow) analysis, IMO.
You being more concerned about the 1% of wrong convictions while ignoring the 99% of correct convictions is very telling. Saying that a convicted child molester still should be protected from others leads one to wonder if deep down inside you have done something that you think you should be protected from...just my opinion.
It is not a matter of "protecting" that particular felon. Again, philosophically I have no problem with simply executing that felon.
My position regarding your "GenPop" question is a matter of not allowing the STATE to avoid a legal restriction upon its action, with a wink and a nod. There are things which a State simply cannot do and still be considered a moral entity, and using sophistry to avoid legal restrictions upon the very actions OF the State is one of those things.
1
Posted on 1/29/23 at 11:57 am to Houag80
Based upon your own statement about willingness to torture someone you KNOW to be innocent, YES, I think you are a sociopath.
Sociopathy and low-IQ are not a good combination.
Sociopathy and low-IQ are not a good combination.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 11:58 am to AggieHank86
quote:
That is a very strange (and shallow) analysis, IMO.
No, you're incapable of understanding the social pariah you're becoming due to your autism
Posted on 1/29/23 at 11:58 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
No doubt about it now, Hank has admitted his softness for molesters and child rapists.
He finally came out and posted his truth. He should be reminded of this every single day and every poster on here should see exactly where he stands. A disgusting protector of scum.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 11:59 am to SOSFAN
quote:Can you provide even one example of a convicted child molester who was not molested himself as a child?
You think an argument can be made that child molester is a victim
Simple question.
quote:I have been attempting to have a reasonable discussion with you. Apparently, that is not possible.
F u
Posted on 1/29/23 at 11:59 am to SOSFAN
quote:
No doubt about it now, Hank has admitted his softness for molesters and child rapists.
He finally came out and posted his truth
He did.
Pedos are as much victims as perps. Will be someones sig I hope.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 12:01 pm to AggieHank86
Lolololol. Bwahahahahh.
Attorney? Lolololol.
Attorney? Lolololol.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 12:01 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:You are a mindless villager with a pitchfork. Trust me, I do not mind (in the slightest) that you do not consider me to be a part of your "club."
social pariah
Posted on 1/29/23 at 12:02 pm to shrevetigertom
quote:
I think you mean deterrent. However, it doesn’t matter whether these scumbags are deterred. They need to die. Period
Woops yeah you're right I did, was tired.
What I was meaning was the idea of the death penalty looming wouldn't incentivize then killing the kid.
On the whole although I struggle to feel sorry for them, I'm not sure how I feel about capital punishment. No matter what I think about it though it's been shown to not have a deterrent effect which is one of the big reasons given by it's proponents. That's why I don't think it would incentivize then to kill the kid, either they planned to already or not but the death penalty isn't factoring into the decision
Posted on 1/29/23 at 12:02 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
have been attempting to have a reasonable discussion with you. Apparently, that is not possible.
F*CK you and your " pedophiles are victims" discussion.
You finally let the vale down and showed your colors. You're a disgusting and vile human that I pray has zero contact with children.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 12:05 pm to SOSFAN
quote:Intelligent people understand the difference between the motivations of (a) "protecting the criminal" versus (b) limiting immoral actions by the State itself.
A disgusting protector of scum.
Sadly, it would appear that you do not.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 12:08 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Sadly, it
You think child molesters are victims.
You're more concerned about the legality of an issue then you are about calling child molesters victims. You're a disgusting POS.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 12:09 pm to SOSFAN
quote:Again, I am simply citing purely-empirical data.
F*CK you and your " pedophiles are victims" discussion. You finally let the vale down and showed your colors.
Again, can you cite to even ONE convicted child molester who was not himself molested as a child?
They do not exist. By DEFINITION, each and every one of them was a "victim" of child molestation before ever becoming a perp.
Did they choose to commit a crime? Yes. Should they be punished? Yes. One can evaluate the appropriate punishment for them, while taking all of those facts into account.
You are reacting to this discussion like an emotional teenage girl.
This post was edited on 1/29/23 at 12:11 pm
Posted on 1/29/23 at 12:09 pm to SOSFAN
quote:
F*CK you and your " pedophiles are victims" discussion.
He loves his child rapists. Its his weakness on this board.
Every fricking thread. "They're victims!"
Posted on 1/29/23 at 12:12 pm to Placekicker
The death penalty always makes for good debate. I'm very pro-death penalty; however, I also acknowledge that the state does get it wrong from time to time.
As long as we maintain innocence until proven guilty as the standard and guilty beyond a reasonable doubt with a unanimous decision by a jury - hang them high. A few innocent people might die, but I'm okay with that. Nothing is perfect, and the good suffer because evil exists. That should not paralyze us from punishing the wicked.
As long as we maintain innocence until proven guilty as the standard and guilty beyond a reasonable doubt with a unanimous decision by a jury - hang them high. A few innocent people might die, but I'm okay with that. Nothing is perfect, and the good suffer because evil exists. That should not paralyze us from punishing the wicked.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 12:12 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Again, I am simply citing purely-empirical data.
You simply stated that you can make an argument that a child molester is a victim. Once you touch a child, no matter what may have led to it, you are the opposite of a victim. To state otherwise is supporting scum... which you're doing.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 12:14 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Roger, SOS is dodging the question like Ben Stiller playing dodgeball. Perhaps YOU have balls.
Can YOU name even one convicted child molester with was not himself molested as a child?
Simple question.
EVERYONE acknowledges that such molestation does irreparable damage to the mental and emotional development of a child. We have seen example(s) of it.
That being the case, why is it NOT appropriate to consider that damage in determining the appropriate punishment for an offender? (e.g. life in prison rather than an extra-judicial execution in GenPop)
Man up. Answer the questions, sir.
Can YOU name even one convicted child molester with was not himself molested as a child?
Simple question.
EVERYONE acknowledges that such molestation does irreparable damage to the mental and emotional development of a child. We have seen example(s) of it.
That being the case, why is it NOT appropriate to consider that damage in determining the appropriate punishment for an offender? (e.g. life in prison rather than an extra-judicial execution in GenPop)
Man up. Answer the questions, sir.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 12:14 pm to Placekicker
I would need to see the state's definition of an act of pedophilia before I would sign off on this.
If an adult (21 and over) has sex with a 12 yr old, then sure, execute them. But if a 21 yr old adult has sex with a 17 yr old, then no.
If an adult (21 and over) has sex with a 12 yr old, then sure, execute them. But if a 21 yr old adult has sex with a 17 yr old, then no.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 12:17 pm to AggieHank86
quote:he's reacting like an actual victim of the very subject of the thread so I tend to listen to what he has to say
You are reacting to this discussion like an emotional teenage girl.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 12:18 pm to SOSFAN
So, we agree that being molested does irreparable damage to the psyche of a child, right?
Once that damage is done, it just "disappears" in your eyes, for an individual who is so-damaged as to act upon the impulses caused by that very damage?
NO ONE is "excusing" his actions. We are DISCUSSING the appropriate punishment FOR those actions.
Set aside the emotional outbursts, SOS. Analyze the facts before you like a rational adult.
Once that damage is done, it just "disappears" in your eyes, for an individual who is so-damaged as to act upon the impulses caused by that very damage?
NO ONE is "excusing" his actions. We are DISCUSSING the appropriate punishment FOR those actions.
Set aside the emotional outbursts, SOS. Analyze the facts before you like a rational adult.
Page 7 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News