- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Felony Hate Crime for making fun of someone's clothes?
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:27 am to Patrick Little CA
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:27 am to Patrick Little CA
The problem with this statute is going the be the word "harasses"
If it's anything like how ADA's treat harassment in the Domestic Assault cases they'll stretch that for their own advantage until someone is forced to pay $25K to appeal a conviction to the State Supreme Court.
If a Man drive buy his former marital residence he's harassing. If his soon to be ex-wife calls him a deadbeat on Facebook, that's not harassment.
ADA's will get to yield this statute however THEY feel is appropriate.
If it's anything like how ADA's treat harassment in the Domestic Assault cases they'll stretch that for their own advantage until someone is forced to pay $25K to appeal a conviction to the State Supreme Court.
If a Man drive buy his former marital residence he's harassing. If his soon to be ex-wife calls him a deadbeat on Facebook, that's not harassment.
ADA's will get to yield this statute however THEY feel is appropriate.
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:28 am to AndyJ
It says harass OR follow OR "disrupt their quote enjoyment". Saying anything is what it says.
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:31 am to AndyJ
quote:
And for some reason, the idiots here go nuts because it will be good for Jewish people.
Quit lying. People are upset because it seems to overstep the 1A and with every little law like this the slippery slope gets steeper.
No one gives an F if it benefits Jews or not.
One of the first comments was about saggy pants. How many Jews walk around with saggy pants?
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:46 am to stout
“ A person who willfully follows, harasses, or
62 interferes with another person's quiet enjoyment based on the
63 person's wearing of religious-based garments or garments
64 commonly associated with a particular religious or ethnic group
65 or any other indicia of any religious or ethnic heritage commits
66 the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third
67 degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s.
68 775.084. A violation of this subsection shall be considered a
69 hate crime for purposes of the reporting requirements of s.”
62 interferes with another person's quiet enjoyment based on the
63 person's wearing of religious-based garments or garments
64 commonly associated with a particular religious or ethnic group
65 or any other indicia of any religious or ethnic heritage commits
66 the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third
67 degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s.
68 775.084. A violation of this subsection shall be considered a
69 hate crime for purposes of the reporting requirements of s.”
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:47 am to AndyJ
None of that backs up your previous claim that this board is upset about the law because it benefits Jews.
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:48 am to stout
quote:there is no question that this board harbors at share of antisemites, but I wonder if either of you read the bill in its entirety.quote:Quit lying. People are upset because it seems to overstep the 1A and with every little law like this the slippery slope gets steeper.
And for some reason, the idiots here go nuts because it will be good for Jewish people.
It does contain some provisions specific to the Jewish religion.
This post was edited on 3/5/23 at 11:49 am
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:52 am to AggieHank86
quote:
It does contain provisions specific to the Jewish religion.
Examples? Are Jewish people the only religion that has easily recognizable religious garments?
I guess Muslims wearing a hijab doesn't count IYO because you and andyj are trying to make this all about Jews.
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:53 am to Patrick Little CA
So Desantis is a dictator
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:54 am to TigerOnTheMountain
quote:or Christians and their stupid little crosses.
Jews (and) their stupid little hat
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:55 am to AggieHank86
That won't be enforced. Go stand by a Jewish neighborhood with your cross and you will definitely get the derisive comments. But you won't get the hate crime.
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:56 am to AggieHank86
quote:
or Christians and their stupid little crosses.
We don’t find this offensive to the point of demanding action on our behalf by the state
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:58 am to TimeOutdoors
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/20/23 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 3/5/23 at 12:02 pm to stout
quote:so, you did not bother to read the statute. Unsurprising. section 806..13(2)(b)
It does contain provisions specific to the Jewish religion.quote:
Examples?
quote:by citing you to specific statutory language dealing with Jews? You are a strange duck.
you and andyj are trying to make this all about Jews.
quote:That is quite a reach.
I guess Muslims wearing a hijab doesn't count IYO
This post was edited on 3/5/23 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 3/5/23 at 12:03 pm to TigerIron
So people can’t make fun of my kilt if I wear it in public?
Posted on 3/5/23 at 12:03 pm to AggieHank86
Why are so many people ignoring this part of the bill?:
It says if a guy hands you a flier and you throw it on the ground, the other guy gets charged with misdemeanor littering. Kind of annoying, but not a big deal right? Well, keep reading:
If the flier is an invite to a party, it's a misdemeanor. However, if the flier says "Muslims suck" then you are charged with a felony.
100% unconstitutional. There is no way SCOTUS lets it stand. Even the liberal members won't like it and I can see it getting overturned 9-0.
quote:
A person who distributes pamphlets, flyers, or other materials, whether for commercial or noncommercial purposes, in a public place, including outside a private residence, and such materials discarded by recipients, leads to littering, commits a misdemeanor of the first degree,
It says if a guy hands you a flier and you throw it on the ground, the other guy gets charged with misdemeanor littering. Kind of annoying, but not a big deal right? Well, keep reading:
quote:
If a violation of sub-subparagraph a. involves material that evidences religious or ethnic animus, including content described in s. 806.13(2)(b), the offense is reclassified as a felony of the third degree
If the flier is an invite to a party, it's a misdemeanor. However, if the flier says "Muslims suck" then you are charged with a felony.
100% unconstitutional. There is no way SCOTUS lets it stand. Even the liberal members won't like it and I can see it getting overturned 9-0.
Posted on 3/5/23 at 12:03 pm to TimeOutdoors
quote:I know how diversified Florida is.
Florida is a very diverse State. This isn’t about someone wearing pants too big for them. This is about people wearing clothes often associated with their culture or religion. Pan African, Jamaican, etc
Posters have to be more responsible here. Anyone claiming this is about loose pants etc is no better than the fake news we find with CNN and MSNBC.
From being asked by an 88 year old in Publix to get an item from a shelf. To every culture and ethnicity, I can think of in Florida.
This doesn't mean a law should be created for the one millionth chance some ignorant person stares at a muslim woman or dot indian and says something. Or dares to say something when people suddenly speak spanish and point at someone.
You cannot fix ignorance this way, and you shouldn't put the ignorant in jail or fine them. All of Bama would be locked up.
This post was edited on 3/5/23 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 3/5/23 at 12:05 pm to TheFolker
quote:apparently so
So people can’t make fun of my kilt if I wear it in public?
but they are still permitted to make fun of what’s underneath it
Posted on 3/5/23 at 12:06 pm to AUstar
The tv is censored. The internet is censored. The radio is censored. They are worried about pamphlets though. There must be some devastating information
Posted on 3/5/23 at 12:07 pm to TheFolker
This post was edited on 3/20/23 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 3/5/23 at 12:07 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:(looks under kilt and sees white ribbon)
they are still permitted to make fun of what’s underneath it
“I don’t know where we’ve been, laddie, but we only took fourth prize”
This post was edited on 3/5/23 at 12:08 pm
Popular
Back to top


0






