- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Federal judges just destroyed 250 billion dollars of trade tariffs
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:30 pm to VoxDawg
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:30 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Let's see what happens. If you don't succumb to your despair and eventually find a way out of your doom spiral, you might be surprised at what develops.
That's easy for you to say when it's not your business that's being put at risk by these tariffs.
2
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:31 pm to dgnx6
I think he's saying the tariffs would be a de facto consumption tax if manufacturers/retailers pass the costs on to the consumer.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:33 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
That's easy for you to say when it's not your business that's being put at risk by these tariffs.
Really? This morning I had to explain to a property management company why the same life safety upgrade I helped them budget for this fiscal year back in 2022 costs $275k more than previously projected.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:36 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:why not both???
government doesn't need more money it needs to cut spending.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:38 pm to Trevaylin
quote:22 whole billion!!!
22 billion in April,
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:05 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:
If a judge makes a sweeping ruling like this and is later overturned on appeal they should face some kind of punishment. Not hanging or anything but pretty severe.
Maybe tarring and feathering
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:07 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
why not both???
Do you think we dont spend enough? The federal govt needs to have a balanced budget and until then, we need drastic cuts, not the status quo
This post was edited on 5/29/25 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:10 pm to alphaandomega
quote:
quote:
If a judge makes a sweeping ruling like this and is later overturned on appeal they should face some kind of punishment. Not hanging or anything but pretty severe.
Maybe tarring and feathering
It worked well as our nation developed, we should bring that type of accountability back.
Back then, folks understood they needed to be prepared to stand behind their words.
Today, cowards hide behind their computers and a weak administration of fairness and justice.
Im certain, if people were held to account, folks behavior would change very quickly.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:16 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:All three need a good case of sudden onset lead poisoning.
Not hanging or anything but pretty severe.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:16 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
Trump can order Coast Guard to stop every inbound ship for deep inspections and hold up shipments for weeks until somebody cries Uncle.
No judge could do a damn thing about that, that is pure Commander-in-Chief power.
I guarantee you, the dems can find or buy a judge to stop this also. The really aggravating thing is 2 out of the 3 judges were appointed by Republicans.
And, as long as that "Convervative" woman is on the Supreme Court, she will do everything to block Trump - unless it is something about abortion.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:26 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
I think he's saying the tariffs would be a de facto consumption tax if manufacturers/retailers pass the costs on to the consumer.
There is no “if”. It’s happening. Our suppliers have mostly targeted June 1st as the date of price increases. Some already have increased costs and others are still a couple weeks away. My clients are schools, manufacturing, behavioral health, government, agricultural, medical… down to things like yoga studios and a small grocery chain.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:28 pm to Trevaylin
If Trump wants tariffs, why doesn't he go about it the right way and pass a law in Congress? Why is he trying to run the global economy by executive fiat?
This post was edited on 5/29/25 at 3:28 pm
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:28 pm to Seldom Seen
:wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah: :wah:
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:28 pm to Trevaylin
So you think a trade deficit is a justified national emergency?
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:32 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
Reported that trade tariffs secured 22 billion in April
Hey, I helped that number by paying 0.00182% of that amount
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:34 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
So you think a trade deficit is a justified national emergency?
An economic emergency is the standard. Clearly the appellate court thinks the admin has a strong argument for that.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:37 pm to Trevaylin
These evil people will eff you and eff our country simply because of TDS. I don’t believe in Eastern religions, but if karma is real, I hope it crashes on all their heads with the weight of a neutron star (or a Peavey T-40 bass for any laymen out there).
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:41 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Clearly the appellate court thinks the admin has a strong argument for that.
They simply issued a stay to allow for arguments over the next two weeks.
Given the nation wide impact that seems pretty standard.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:42 pm to Trevaylin
Those judges can’t do jackshit. It will get overturned
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:43 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
the judges just blew up all negotiating capability
They blew up Trumps "emergency" scheme.
Want better trade deals with trading partners? there is a lawful way to do that.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News