- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Federal judge rules that U of Wyoming sorority must allow men claiming to be women to join
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:02 pm to wackatimesthree
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:02 pm to wackatimesthree
I’m suggesting it’s all part of the same agenda. Not that it’s one and not the other.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:02 pm to cafeaulait19
quote:
You would think they might be able to come up with a reason not to extend a bid …
In my fraternity, it only took one "nay" to deny it. The naysayer would have to explain his reason to the President of the chapter. The President could overrule one "no" vote; however, if that person got just one dude to back his play, it was over. Not even the President could override 2 votes.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:03 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:
Was never in a frat (didn’t need to rent friends)
Was in a fraternity but was pretty apathetic about it. But I found most people who said something like this were bitter and probably would need to rent a friend.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:05 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I’m suggesting it’s all part of the same agenda. Not that it’s one and not the other.
Yeah, but that's like the whole "Tariffs are to even out trade imbalances" vs "tariffs are to bring manufacturing back here." Both can't happen. If one does, the other won't.
In this case (as it was originally framed, anyway...it now looks like an totally different case), the LGBTQs only win if the sorority accepts the member; they lose if the sorority shuts down.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:07 pm to Laugh More
quote:
That old guy doesn’t believe that shite.
He’s either got skeletons in his closet or a bunch of Benjamins in his closet
He's probably been wearing women's panties and blowing dudes at the local glory hole for decades...
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:07 pm to L.A.
Speaking for GDI, we don't want him, either.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:07 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
This will eventually go to SCOTUS and be struck down.
Yeah SCOTUS already ruled on this with the Boy Scouts years ago, and said the "Right of Association" also include "Right of disassociation". in that private organizations can exclude people they don't want.
Boy Scouts did not have to allow gays in the troops but they caved to social pressure.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:08 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:
Was never in a frat (didn’t need to rent friends),
Id love to analyze your finances and show you all the rent a friends you have.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:10 pm to AubieinNC2009
quote:
Yeah SCOTUS already ruled on this with the Boy Scouts years ago, and said the "Right of Association" also include "Right of disassociation". in that private organizations can exclude people they don't want.
That makes sense in the context of the fact that it appears that this case is not framed correctly.
It appears that individual members of the sorority brought the lawsuit, not the sorority, and they individuals brought it against the sorority.
And the judge ruled that the sorority could decide for themselves who to accept or not, and the sorority is the one who let the guy stay.
So that makes sense. That judge's was ruling consistent with the case you mentioned.
This post was edited on 8/25/25 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:12 pm to L.A.
Good thing they circled the dude or I never would have known which one.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:13 pm to L.A.
How long before one of the girls gets raped, or finds herself nude online because the perv was filming them?
I would love anyone who thinks (leftists) this ruling is correct, please explain how this is OK.
I would love anyone who thinks (leftists) this ruling is correct, please explain how this is OK.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:15 pm to PeleofAnalytics
quote:
But I found most people who said something like this were bitter and probably would need to rent a friend.
Was mostly a nod to Ags of a certain age. One of the more notorious dorms on campus used to sell a T-shirt that said “Rent a Friend. Join a Frat.”
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:15 pm to L.A.
It’s a private membership organization and subject to a vote of the current membership to issue bids to new members and to initiate them.
The court is saying that they MUST issue a bid and initiate someone they don’t want?
The court is saying that they MUST issue a bid and initiate someone they don’t want?
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:15 pm to anc
quote:
Kappa Kappa Gamma's national office did this - they updated their membership standards to read "open to women and those who identify as women."
OK, that makes some sense of this situation. Otherwise, this ruling is, pardon the pun, way out of left field.
If the national orgs persist in their insistence, expect membership in those organizations to shrink dramatically.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:17 pm to GeauxBurrow312
quote:
How is a perverted **** allowed to insert himself into their lives without getting the shite kicked out of him?
I'm sure one of the girls' boyfriends will pay him a visit if he tries anything. If not, he doesn't deserve her. or maybe he is a lefty and sees no problem.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:18 pm to SallysHuman
That is what I was thinking. Don't all the girls in the sorority have to approve his joining?
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:18 pm to L.A.
So they pledge. Don't pick them. Eazy, peazy! See how much money "it" has when they sue. Surely the national would help them out. Missing the point, I know but this has to be fought some time.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:19 pm to BhamTigah
quote:
Good thing they circled the dude or I never would have known which one.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:28 pm to BigJim
quote:
Kappa Kappa Gamma's national office did this - they updated their membership standards to read "open to women and those who identify as women."
Hell, maybe this becomes a cautionary lesson in organizations like this thinking they have to kowtow virtue signal to every progressive pet cause du jour.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:55 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
He's probably been wearing women's panties and blowing dudes at the local glory hole for decades...

Popular
Back to top



1





