- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Explain what caused the towers to collspse.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:35 pm to AtticusOSullivan
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:35 pm to AtticusOSullivan
quote:
Office chairs?
How many burning office chairs does it take to produce this much smoke?
1
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:35 pm to AtticusOSullivan
Numerous buildings have been hit by planes and burned multiple times throughout modern history.
These are the first two to ever fall down as a result. Ever.
That's suspect enough, but then you look at WTC-7 and there is no explanation other than a controlled demolition, which is clearly visible in captured video. Add in the video with news reporters reporting WTC-7 collapsed, with WTC-7 in the background prior to demolition.
This is murder, conspiracy and coverup at the highest levels of society. It's hard to believe anything after that.
These are the first two to ever fall down as a result. Ever.
That's suspect enough, but then you look at WTC-7 and there is no explanation other than a controlled demolition, which is clearly visible in captured video. Add in the video with news reporters reporting WTC-7 collapsed, with WTC-7 in the background prior to demolition.
This is murder, conspiracy and coverup at the highest levels of society. It's hard to believe anything after that.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:35 pm to AtticusOSullivan
quote:
Jet fuel has a set btu content. The amount doesnt matter. The fact is there is not enough btus in kerosene/gasoline to cause inches of steel to fail. It just cant happen.
You are absolutely ignorant and full of shite.
You have a fundamental lack of understanding here.
It can happen, and it did happen.
Have you ever used a propane torch to heat and bend mild steel? It's a pretty simple concept and I can assure you the trusses and floor joists of both WTC 1 and 2 weren't manufactured out of some high strength aerospace alloy.
Frick every one of you clowns who claim to be experts because you watch some 9/11 truther videos on Youtube.
The fact that you use the day itself to spout this drivel is especially shameful.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:35 pm to flyingtexastiger
quote:
The B-767 hit the building that weighed/massed conservatively 3-4 times as much traveling 3-4 times faster carrying 12 x as much flammable liquid.
Again, none of it gets you to the temperature needed to melt steel. You're throwing around Physics I equations like you're fricking Einstein or something.
More to it went into it than Force.
You're walking around beating your chest like you're a Nobel Laureate.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:37 pm to AndyCBR
quote:
Have you ever used a propane torch to heat and bend mild steel?
Does propane burn hotter than jet fuel? You must be a big fan of Forged in Fire.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:38 pm to GWM
quote:
quote:
B-767 fuel capacity = 24,000 gallons
That's "capacity". Were they at full capacity ?
Was the B-17 at full capacity??
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:39 pm to jcaz
quote:
Explosive force of an airliner structurally messing things up for starters. But what really did it was the long burning jet fuel fire that didn’t melt, but weakened the steep support beams. Once one floor went… it was a chain reaction and the building pancaked down onto itself.
Yes, except for one little issue. Damage and weakening from heat would not have been uniform across the damaged floors. This would make one area fail before the others and that would translate to the upper part of the building falling at an angle or toward the weakened side. It's unlikely that the top would have fallen straight down, and it did. Twice.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:40 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
It doesn't matter lol they're clueless
Just naive. What caused the third building to collapse, no airplanes hit it. What about the muffed reporting that has been scrubbed from the WWW ? What about the visual demolition charges that were plainly visible ?
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:40 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
What do you think happened? The feds took advantage of terrorists flying planes into the Twin Towers to bomb some random smaller buildings?
Exactly. We should care more about the War in Iraq conspiracy, not a third tower. No one even remembers the third tower. It falling had absolutely no consequence. Why people care about that rabbit hole I don't know. I love to mention it, but I don't care about it, and anyone running an inside job would have no reason to destroy that building.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:40 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Does propane burn hotter than jet fuel? You must be a big fan of Forged in Fire.
Matters not. The point you retards fail to grasp is steel, any steel, is much weaker at elevated temperatures well below its "melting point".
The people who were not even born yet or were busy filling their diapers with shite on 9/11/01 are now experts in metallurgy, failure mechanics, and demolition and are now here to set the record straight on this event.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:41 pm to AtticusOSullivan
The frickery surrounding Tower 7 coming down leads me to believe it's a mix of what we saw and a little extra. I wouldn't be surprised at all if demolition was involved. Humans can be shady af.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:41 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Errerrerrwere
Jesus Christ, you are a dumb bitch.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:41 pm to Errerrerrwere
was pre wired for a controlled demolition,some beams were cut,thermite was used.the towers were shut down for a time to give crews some time,building 7 was the control center,eplosives were used watch some videos
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:41 pm to GWM
quote:
What about the muffed reporting that has been scrubbed from the WWW ? What about the visual demolition charges that were plainly visible ?
And what the fireman heard that day in interviews. Pop. Pop. Pooping sounds. Several on the news claiming what they heard before the demolition.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:42 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Again, none of it gets you to the temperature needed to melt steel. You're throwing around Physics I equations like you're fricking Einstein or something.
More to it went into it than Force.
You're walking around beating your chest like you're a Nobel Laureate.
I'm a LSU History major!!
Even I know that the problem has nothing to do with what is the melting point of steel! Get an Engineer in here to explain to you the stresses placed on the structure of a modern skyscraper is and what is the ultimate failure load when a 400 mph airliner takes out much of the structural strength of the building. Here's your sign BTW.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:43 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Pooping sounds
This is what your posts sound like.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:43 pm to AndyCBR
quote:
Matters not
Matters so. We still haven't got to the temperature that would cause this to fall. Been asking but noone wants to answer.
The only two steel beam buildings to ever go down in the history of the world.
What happened next?
Well, the good ole US of A went to war for the next 20 years.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:44 pm to AtticusOSullivan
quote:
Ok explain Tower 3.
Building 7 is the real kicker
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:45 pm to Bayoutigre
the steel from the aftermath was immediately shipped to china,some pieces saved showed traces of thermite
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:45 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Melting furnaces used in foundries to liquify metals run on propane , which has only a slightly higher heat of combustion than that of kerosene (jet fuel). The closed confines of an office building likely simulated those of a melting furnace, at least enough to cause the structure to weaken, if not melt.
Page 4 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News