- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ethics Complaint Filed Against Rep. Ilhan Omar
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:40 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:40 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I keep asking for an outline of the procedures for deporting a US citizen.
We're just sending her back to LA or Detroit or Baltimore or just pick any large hood you like
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:41 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
For the whole marrying her brother bs story.
You got a link saying she didn't?
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:41 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I am still waiting.

Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:43 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Send her back. Tell her to take her brother with her. Someone says this in every thread about this woman. I keep asking for an outline of the procedures for deporting a US citizen. I am still waiting.
Wait no longer dumbass.
Although rare, it is possible for a naturalized U.S. citizen to have their citizenship stripped through a process called "denaturalization." Former citizens who are denaturalized are subject to removal (deportation) from the United States. Natural-born U.S. citizens may not have their citizenship revoked against their will, since birthright citizenship is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, but they may choose to renounce their citizenship on their own.
This article covers the grounds for having one's U.S. citizenship revoked, the basics of the denaturalization process, and defenses to denaturalization.
Grounds for Denaturalization
Falsification or Concealment of Relevant Facts: You must be absolutely truthful when filling out paperwork and answering interview questions related to the naturalization application process. Even if the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) fails to recognize any lies or ommissions at first, the agency may file a denaturalization action against you after citizenship has been granted. Examples include failure to disclose criminal activities or lying about one's real name or identity.
Refusal to Testify Before Congress: You may not refuse to testify before a U.S. congressional committee whose job it is to investigate your alleged involvement in subversive acts, such as those intended to harm U.S. officials or overthrow the U.S. government. This requirement to testify in order to maintain citizenship status expires after 10 years.
Membership in Subversive Groups: Your citizenship may be revoked if the U.S. government can prove that you joined a subversive organization within five years of becoming a naturalized citizen. Membership in such organizations is considered a violation of the oath of U.S. allegiance. Examples include the Nazi Party and Al Qaeda.
Dishonorable Military Discharge: Since you may become a naturalized U.S. citizen by virtue of serving in the U.S. military, your citizenship may be revoked if you are dishonorably discharged before serving five years. Reasons for dishonorable discharge, which must follow a general court-martial, include desertion and sexual assault.
Findlaw link
This post was edited on 7/23/19 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:44 pm to Jarlaxle
being that judicial watch had to do this speaks volumes about corrupt DC.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:44 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
She should sue Fitton and Judicial Watch for their every penny.
You people are full blown cracking up.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:47 pm to TheHarahanian
quote:
David Steinberg
He was a hoot back in the 70's. Carson had him on the Tonight Show quite a few times.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:48 pm to Dale51
quote:
You people are full blown cracking up.
They have to resist on principle alone
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:48 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
quote:FightnBobLafollettesupports incest marriage
He also supports fundamentalist muslims, who don't have any concerns or problems with what happened on 9/11, beyond backlash against other muslims who have already invaded.
He also supports socialists, who openly seek to destroy this country's institutions and founding principles, so they can be re-made more in line with the communist/socialist mold which has destroyed country after country.
FightnBobLafollette is a traitor, whose value to this country is commensurate with the brown stain on toilet paper when one wipes their arse. Yawn indeed.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:48 pm to Wtodd
quote:
Well incest is a crime
well it was....until now
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:51 pm to Beessnax
quote:
And we elected her to be a lawmaker?
Not unless we live in her distric. Which we don't. She got elected by her fellow jihadi's.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:52 pm to upgrayedd
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:56 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
The conspiracies around Omar’s marriage have been further fueled by the lack of documents her family has because of their status as refugees from war-torn Somalia, Omar’s reluctance to discuss the smear, and her own complicated marriage history—which critics have used to sow confusion about her marriage.
Lol
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:57 pm to Jarlaxle
Doesn't something or someone have to actually possess ethics, and practice them? In order to be sued or a complaint made against them?
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:57 pm to the808bass
What is "complicated" about her marriage history if not what is being speculated?
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:57 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
You got a link saying she didn't?
Some drivel from the Daily Beast
So that's a no to the link, huh?
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:59 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
What is "complicated" about her marriage history if not what is being speculated?
Well, first she religiously married a guy but not legally. Then she legally married a guy but not religiously. Then she got religiously divorced but not legally. Then she got legally divorced. Then she shacked up with her first husband again. And so on and so forth.
This post was edited on 7/23/19 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:59 pm to mmcgrath
Lmao nothing in that link disproved the claim
They played semantics about the source of the claim
They played semantics about the source of the claim
Popular
Back to top


0











