- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: EO on LGBT adoption incoming (edit: false alarm)
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:23 pm to Sentrius
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:23 pm to Sentrius
quote:
a stable home with a stable family is still a good environment for children regardless of its straight or gay over a fricking orphanage
By what measure?
And even if so, should we prevent people who believe that homosexual acts are perverse from participation in adoption services? Even though such people constituted probably 100% of the available services not very long ago?
1
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:24 pm to uway
quote:
Why? Because people who don't think we should murder human fetuses don't also believe it's their responsibility to raise everyone else's children for them? brilliant
I would assume the pro life crowd would want children in a safe and loving household regardless of the sexual orientation of the adoptive parents. Life being precious and all. Also better they are raised by gay taxpaying parents instead of public funds in the system right?
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:24 pm to The Spleen
quote:
FWIW, every leak on his EO's so far have been pretty spot on. Details haven't been leaked, but scope and intent of them has.
I agree, but those links didn't come from a nobody like this.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:24 pm to The Spleen
quote:
FWIW, every leak on his EO's so far have been pretty spot on. Details haven't been leaked, but scope and intent of them has.
al.com has been getting lots of Trump leaks?
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:25 pm to uway
A difficult topic for sure. My thoughts are that it surely is better to be in a stable same-sex parent household than being raised by the state. How much better? I don't know
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:25 pm to uway
quote:
You're saying this would be true if he issued an executive order that let groups exclude same sex couples from their adoption services?
I'm saying an order like that will basically be ignored in California for example- the state gov won't certify or fund any group that chooses to puruse those policies.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:26 pm to clooneyisgod
quote:
I think many objective observers will agree that his trigger happy high volume use of executive orders, in general, flies in the face of small government principles. And if you're short on time, you can spare me your intense response about the substance of his executive orders actually being "small government" in nature. On other hand if you have a ton of time on your hands, feel free to unburden yourself and put it all down here. I'm really looking forward to reading it.
Your response says all I need to know. You clearly know that his executive orders so far do align with small government principles. I needn't say anymore.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:27 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
I needn't say anymore.
Agreed.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:27 pm to Broseph Barksdale
quote:
I agree, but those links didn't come from a nobody like this.
Connor Sheets? His Tweet simply links to the lgbqt site, who claims to have been leaked the info. There are a LOT of gay people in DC, many presumably working in Trump's White House. I don't 100% buy what they're reporting, but I don't doubt the possibility some are leaking the info.
A Washington Post(I know, fake news) is also reporting his sources are saying similar.
We shall see....
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:29 pm to Sentrius
quote:
You're still a fricking chicken shite.
You looked so pathetic ghosting this board after Trump won.
I was gone regardless of who won for at least a month hell I even told people on here that I was going on vacation either way. Almost no one I know regardless of party was doimg anything but vacation until the New Year, unless you work political cycles you wouldn't understand but we essetially work without weekends for 12-18 months working 80-100 weeks then take months off.
This post was edited on 1/30/17 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:30 pm to TennesseeFan25
Proof positive you have no clue how bad the foster system actually is.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:32 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Trump is an idiot if he tries to shutdown those adoptions.
The idiots are the ones who actually believe shite like this.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:34 pm to BamaGradinTn
The Trump team has been unconventional but not stupid. This rumor would make for a hell of a distraction.
If signed, one is forced to really wonder if Trump and Co have the political acumen to do the job.
If signed, one is forced to really wonder if Trump and Co have the political acumen to do the job.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:35 pm to montanagator
quote:
I was gone regardless of who won for at least a month
Right.
quote:
hell I even told people on here that I was going on vacation either way.
Provide links backing this up or STFU.
quote:
Almost no one I know regardless of party was doimg anything but vacation until the New Year, unless you work political cycles you wouldn't understand but we essetially work without weekends for 12-18 months working 80-100 weeks then take months off.
You were posting on the SEC Rant, team boards and other boards as well in that time frame while avoiding this board.
You're still a chicken shite that can't even admit it and take your lumps.
People like NT74, Big Scrub and others took theirs like a real man.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:44 pm to montanagator
quote:
I was gone regardless of who won for at least a month
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:46 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
What could this possibly be about?
Sounds like he might be opening a can of worms best left in the cupboard.
Sounds like he might be opening a can of worms best left in the cupboard.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:46 pm to The Spleen
Those people have no inside sources.
And we are relying on their interpretation of the text of the EO.
And we are relying on their interpretation of the text of the EO.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:47 pm to joshnorris14
I'm just hoping it shuts their damn asses up for a few days. Everyone is tired of the sermons
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:53 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Those people have no inside sources.
Maybe they don't. I'm skeptical of what has been reported.
My opinion is based on my gut feeling, which isn't worth a damn I know.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 4:53 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Josh Rogin ?@joshrogin 20m20 minutes ago
More: EO could allow fed employees to refuse to serve LGBT based on belief marriage is b/t man & woman or gender is immutable from birth
More: EO could allow fed employees to refuse to serve LGBT based on belief marriage is b/t man & woman or gender is immutable from birth
Page 8 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News