- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Elon Musk: “If you have bureaucracy in charge, then what meaning does democracy have?"
Posted on 2/11/25 at 6:27 pm to SingleMalt1973
Posted on 2/11/25 at 6:27 pm to SingleMalt1973
quote:
That is correct but they are dismantling a kleptocracy which we sure as hell not supposed to have.
FIFY
Posted on 2/11/25 at 6:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Somebody needs to tell Elon we're not a democracy.
I was going to post the same thing.

Posted on 2/11/25 at 7:43 pm to OBReb6
quote:
What would be your message to these people?
If you start veer of the side of the road don't over correct your steering. Try avoid making sudden, large adjustments to the steering wheel when trying to correct your vehicle's course, as this can easily lead to loss of control and potentially dangerous situations; instead, make smooth, gradual steering inputs to regain control.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 8:00 pm to ThuperThumpin
Judges trampling upon the rights of the Executive branch need to be punished. Congress should pass a law that the President has the right to audit any agnecy in the executive branch with whomever he chooses and to stop payments that are wasteful and fraudulent. The dems who go against this are going to be scorched in the next election. Trump hasd the authority to take away security clearances and he has the authority to grant them. A political appointee who was appointed by an elected president has more right to review sensitive information than some bureaucrat who believes his liberal agenda trumps what is best for the nation's welfare.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 8:03 pm to BBONDS25
Oh ok, so we’re don’t pretending I should be upset the federal government had an IT department and were onto “he only makes suggestions”
I mean besides the information he can now access that is protected by federal law, i guess I will take comfort in the guy making suggestions to the president having no idea how our government works.
I mean besides the information he can now access that is protected by federal law, i guess I will take comfort in the guy making suggestions to the president having no idea how our government works.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:25 pm to John Barron
Posted on 2/12/25 at 9:32 am to SammyTiger
quote:
Oh ok, so we’re don’t pretending I should be upset the federal government had an IT department and were onto “he only makes suggestions”
Is English your second language? And yes…he is making suggestions. Do you think otherwise?
quote:
I mean besides the information he can now access that is protected by federal law,
Which information are you referring to, specifically? And what federal law are you referring to, specifically? I guarantee you don’t know and you are just ignorantly repeating some msnbc talking point.
quote:
i guess I will take comfort in the guy making suggestions to the president having no idea how our government works.
So….you prefer status quo? Yikes.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 9:36 am to SammyTiger
He didn’t freeze funds, the executive did. Doge is just auditing
And congress doesn’t allocate line item spending just budget
Lack of understanding on this is amazing. SFP certainly hasn’t grasped the concept
And congress doesn’t allocate line item spending just budget
Lack of understanding on this is amazing. SFP certainly hasn’t grasped the concept
Posted on 2/12/25 at 9:57 am to lsu777
quote:
And congress doesn’t allocate line item spending just budget
except they sometimes do allocate funds.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 9:59 am to SammyTiger
quote:
except they sometimes do allocate funds.
In those specific cases has the funds been shutoff?
You are right in some cases they do specify a specific item to be bought or a program to have certain funds
But how those funds are actually spent is not done by congress
Posted on 2/12/25 at 10:00 am to John Barron
Posted on 2/12/25 at 10:26 am to SammyTiger
I’ll ask again:
quote:
Which information are you referring to, specifically? And what federal law are you referring to, specifically?
Posted on 2/12/25 at 10:30 am to OBReb6
quote:
So if both parties are moving this direction, we need to make sure we are the ones in power when the shoe drops. I wish I could say I’m joking about all of this.
Exactly. All this is ok if you agree with who is in charge. When you have a tranny that identifies as a dog on weekends as president and they are pushing their agenda on us it's not good.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 10:11 am to BBONDS25
quote:
What, specifically, is his conflict of interest?
He has open investigations and litigation that is occurring against his companies by 11 of the 12 federal agencies that he has attacked, so far.
He has just been awarded a federal contract worth $400 million for armored Tesla cybertrucks.
... and all of this is occurring while he's asserting some interest in "eliminating corruption" in the federal government.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:31 pm to John Barron
Musk showing how much of an entitled idiot he is while Donnie is half asleep in the cuck chair
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
If you were corrupt, Trump would hire you
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:44 pm to Padme
quote:
Also, how does someone making a couple hundred thousand per year become millionaires over time? Where are they acquiring their wealth?
Is this a joke? How is someone making a couple hundred thousand a year NOT becoming a millionaire over time?
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:48 pm to John Barron
Those commie founding fathers with their constitution and separation of powers. #musk_rant
Popular
Back to top
