Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Early 80's movie The Day After

Posted on 3/2/22 at 10:17 pm
Posted by boxersdrule
Member since Nov 2007
613 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 10:17 pm
I was 10 when this movie came out detailing nuclear war. I remember the crazy kiss your arse goodbye drills we'd do at school. This scene scared the ever loving shite outta me more than any stupid horror movie I ever saw. The entire movie is also available on YouTube if you've never seen it. I'm a KU Jayhawk. This movie always struck a cord with me because a good chunk of it was filmed in Allen Fieldhouse as most of the movie is set in Kansas & they used it as a makeshift hospital. Here is the carnage scene if you wanna have nightmares tonight knowing there's idiots, corrupt military & political people, & dictators with their fingers on that button...
YouTube link of carnage scene
Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
5572 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 10:20 pm to
This movie was anti-Reagan predominately, but also anti-Republican and anti-American.

All that said, I enjoyed it. Late 20’s at the time.
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
63327 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 10:23 pm to
I thought it was romantic when the two teens kiss, only to remove each other’s hair.
Posted by UnclePat76
McHenry County Illinois
Member since Sep 2004
2450 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 10:25 pm to
All the let’s bomb Russia people need to watch this. When they are done they can watch Threads which makes the Day After look like Mr.Rogers.

It was a great but horribly depressing movie. Have seen it a few times in my life. Part that hit me the most was the mom making the bed then being dragged away to the shelter. This was the movie that made us realize that it’s not just DC and New York that get nuked if we have a nuclear exchange.
Posted by UnclePat76
McHenry County Illinois
Member since Sep 2004
2450 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 10:28 pm to
I loved Reagan but he was getting too hawkish. You still had the paranoid leaders in the Kremlin like Andropov and Chernenko who remembered being attacked twice in 40 years resulting in Russia losing millions of people. Even Reagan said this movie sadly depressed him and lead him to back down.
Posted by Christopher Columbo
Member since Jun 2015
2100 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 10:36 pm to
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56349 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 10:48 pm to
i remember how serious the tv people were about it, suggesting that parents have serious talks with their kids as to whether or not they should see it. it was great marketing, and my parents played right into it, first saying we couldn't watch it and then deciding at the last minute that it would be best if we watched it. i'm sure that's exactly what the network wanted.

All i really remember is a bunch of people getting fried and jason Robards walking around with his hair falling out.
Posted by Numberwang
Bike City, USA
Member since Feb 2012
13163 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 11:21 pm to
I was six when this movie came out. I actually watched a quick 8 minute cut version of it on Youtube last night.

I remember the kid being blinded more than anything. And the bodies in the rubble.

Not remembering the Cold War is a big GenX/Millennial divide.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14198 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 11:59 pm to
Should be required viewing for the “yeah, frick Putin we need to bomb his convoy..” crowd.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17033 posts
Posted on 3/3/22 at 2:04 am to
Another good nuke movie is "By Dawn's Early Light" which was made for HBO in 1990. It shows how leaders can quickly escalate due to misunderstandings.
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
7421 posts
Posted on 3/3/22 at 3:01 am to
quote:

This movie was anti-Reagan predominately, but also anti-Republican and anti-American. All that said, I enjoyed it. Late 20’s at the time.


Then a few years later, ABC then did a miniseries called Amerika which was about a Russian take over of the US without a bomb being dropped. Some called that movie right wing propaganda. While The Day After was considered left wing propaganda.
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13496 posts
Posted on 3/3/22 at 3:43 am to
quote:

I loved Reagan but he was getting too hawkish. You still had the paranoid leaders in the Kremlin like Andropov and Chernenko who remembered being attacked twice in 40 years resulting in Russia losing millions of people. Even Reagan said this movie sadly depressed him and lead him to back down.

Actually the timeline doesn’t fit your theory.

Reagan took office in 1981 the same year that this movie was commissioned. Reagan was trying to revitalize NATO in the face of Soviet expansion and aggression in Asia, Africa, South America, Central America, and the Caribbean. Europe and parts of America were demoralized and the “Peace Movement” was pushing the West in general and NATO in particular to denuclearize first as a demonstration to the communist of our good intentions. They predicted that the paranoid Russians who “had been attacked twice in forty years”, as you put it were just peaceful people who would then follow suit.

Several problems. Russia was NOT attacked in WWI. It was the first Great Nation to mobilize against another Great Nation, Austria-Hungary, and Russia first invaded Germany and Austria-Hungary! Also, Russia was not sitting peacefully by at the start of WWII. It had fought the Japanese over control of Mongolia in the late 30s. It had made an agreement to mutually invade Poland with Hitler. It had conquered the Baltic’s, and carved up Finland. Stalin was very keen on invading Germany, but the Finnish War had revealed how crappy the Red Army was after his butcheries of the officer corps. Yes they were and are paranoid about being a backwards nation compared to Western and Central Europe. But they are not and never were peaceful.

This was a leftist propaganda film, that had the nuclear war started in Europe with a NATO-Warsaw Pact war.

Reagan was not “hawkish” at all. He wanted a strong and reinvigorated Europe to prevent Soviet expansion. He wanted to stop and reverse Soviet and Cuban expansionists in Africa and America. He did not trust Communist and called them the Evil Empire, but he was prepared to negotiate verifiable peace initiatives. Remember, “Hawkish Reagan” offered to eliminate ALL nuclear weapons with the USSR, but the “Peacenik Gorbachev” refused!
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
24969 posts
Posted on 3/3/22 at 4:22 am to
It was Reagan’s strong stance which led to the end of the Cold War. For decades the DC establishment we’re perfectly fine with allowing the old Soviet Union to exist, as long as everyone turned a blind eye to their corruption& brutality. Kinda like everyone is doing with China today.

Reagan wasn’t too hawkish. He was exactly the man needed for the time.
Posted by jctiger73
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2009
254 posts
Posted on 3/3/22 at 6:01 am to
I would suggest a movie called "Threads." It is a BBC television movie. It not only addresses the immediate impact of nuclear war, but also covers the next twenty years. It gives one something to think about. Available on DVD from Netflix.
Posted by TheFonz
Somewhere in Louisiana
Member since Jul 2016
20383 posts
Posted on 3/3/22 at 6:22 am to
I was too young to remember the initial broadcast of the movie, but I remember seeing it a few times on television later on. Maybe they showed it annually for a few years after? Anyway, another nuclear war movie very much worth watching is “Testament.” One of very few movies that ever made me tear up.
This post was edited on 3/3/22 at 6:23 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram