Started By
Message

re: Durham says no more charges coming

Posted on 9/14/22 at 11:50 am to
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53436 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 11:50 am to
quote:

Who is Slay News?


No idea, but they are quoting NYT and Just The News
Posted by LEASTBAY
Member since Aug 2007
14261 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 11:50 am to
quote:

according to media reports.


Their source.
Posted by Rufus T Firefly
Member since Aug 2022
483 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 11:50 am to
we're not going to fix the system from within the system

tear it down to the ground, burn it all
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53436 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 11:51 am to
quote:

We just heard the fbi paid for the Russian sourced dossier! WTF!





Yes. They did.
Posted by LEASTBAY
Member since Aug 2007
14261 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 11:52 am to
Yesterday it was reported the investigation was winding down. No one ever said no more charges. Seems made up.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
259905 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 11:52 am to
quote:

One of these days, y’all will see the truth. There were never any major charges coming from him or anyone else.


Its all part of the dog and pony show.

Spooks have conveniently created two rabid camps angry at each other. Nice political theater.
Posted by FlyingTiger1955
Member since Jan 2019
5765 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 11:57 am to
No surprise, that’s was his job from day one.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118665 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 11:59 am to
Bill Barr was the bondo Durham is the paint.


Gotta preserve MUH Institutions.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32204 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Durham says no more charges coming
He should have been able to figure that out in 2 weeks.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53436 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:02 pm to
The timing is perfect too.



More ammo for the left. How many years of $$$$ spent and nothing.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
63865 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:05 pm to
Aren't political opponents allowed to do opposition research? Aren't they allowed to make bad decisions and purchase bogus info from consultants and opposition research firms? Aren't they allowed to release this info? Isn't the press allowed to publish information that was given to them?

There has never been a criminal there there. It's just straight up dirty politics with a complicit dishonest media.
Posted by ImaObserver
Member since Aug 2019
2277 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:06 pm to
"Trust Sessions", "Trust Huber", "Trust Barr" "Trust Durham?"
But I never trusted any of them and never will trust our government or our courts again.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
48831 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:06 pm to
I'm not basing my mood on what Slay News says.
Posted by Captain Poopie Pants
Pag Island
Member since Jun 2020
463 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:07 pm to
Of course. That’s why the corrupt FBI raided Mar-a-Lago. They knew Durham was wrapping things up and Trump would release Crossfire Hurricane documents to the public.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111496 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

One of these days, y’all will see the truth. There were never any major charges coming from him or anyone else.


Who are you talking to?
Most of the people on this board are pretty aware of the corruption. There was never going to be any real damage done to the power of the state to surveil whoever they want whenever they want.

And that would be the only result of actually investigating this. A curtailing of their power.
Posted by LookSquirrel
Member since Oct 2019
5901 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:10 pm to
Not sure if this is believable or not. For instance, I never heard of "Slay News", and the author uses the pseudonym of David Hawkins.

David Hawkins (February 28, 1913 – February 24, 2002) was a professor whose interests included the philosophy of science, mathematics, economics, childhood science education, and ethics. He was also an administrative assistant at the Manhattan Project's Los Alamos Laboratory

Not saying it's wrong, just will have to look for more sources.

ETA; The first hit from a simple search shows this thread as a "source".
This post was edited on 9/14/22 at 12:17 pm
Posted by LEASTBAY
Member since Aug 2007
14261 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:13 pm to
And he uses NYT as a source but I don't remember them saying this. Maybe I'm mistake or someone can link this.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53436 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Aren't political opponents allowed to do opposition research? Aren't they allowed to make bad decisions and purchase bogus info from consultants and opposition research firms? Aren't they allowed to release this info? Isn't the press allowed to publish information that was given to them?

There has never been a criminal there there. It's just straight up dirty politics with a complicit dishonest media.



Oh please! They used the FBI and DOJ. Not only that, those agents put over those investigations sought to undo Trump and still are.


They lied to a FISA court.

They planted evidence.


Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123779 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

Slaynews?

quote:


Durham Inquiry Appears to Wind Down as Grand Jury Expires
The special counsel appointed by the Trump administration to examine the Russia investigation seems to be wrapping up its work with no further charges in store.
By Katie Benner, Adam Goldman and Charlie Savage
Sept. 14, 2022


WASHINGTON — When John H. Durham was assigned by the Justice Department in 2019 to examine the origins of the investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign’s ties to Russia, President Donald J. Trump and his supporters expressed a belief that the inquiry would prove that a “deep state” conspiracy including top Obama-era officials had worked to sabotage him.

Now Mr. Durham appears to be winding down his three-year inquiry without anything close to the results Mr. Trump was seeking. The grand jury that Mr. Durham has recently used to hear evidence has expired, and while he could convene another, there are currently no plans to do so, three people familiar with the matter said.

Mr. Durham and his team are working to complete a final report by the end of the year, they said, and one of the lead prosecutors on his team is leaving for a job with a prominent law firm.

LINK
Posted by Animal
Member since Dec 2017
4217 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Next two years are literally the precipice of this Republic


Nah, think that threshold has been crossed. We are in fall before the abrupt stop.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram