- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dr Peter McCullough destroys the entire COVID narrative on Rogan, explains HCQ, Ivermectin
Posted on 12/15/21 at 1:18 pm to musick
Posted on 12/15/21 at 1:18 pm to musick
quote:Yes it is. I am shocked this is the first time I have ever heard of him. Clear, concise, to the point. He knows his stuff.
It's a must listen
2
Posted on 12/15/21 at 1:21 pm to PaddleFaster
Highlights covered here
Watch the MSM pundits spin it...
They cite Wikipedia in the same breath as cautioning folks to beware of people who point out how many citations they have
Waiting for the worms...
https://news.yahoo.com/controversial-dr-peter-mccullough-claims-152700718.html
Watch the MSM pundits spin it...
They cite Wikipedia in the same breath as cautioning folks to beware of people who point out how many citations they have
Waiting for the worms...
https://news.yahoo.com/controversial-dr-peter-mccullough-claims-152700718.html
quote:
The Hill
Controversial Dr. Peter McCullough claims to Joe Rogan that lack of Covid treatments DELIBERATE
This post was edited on 12/15/21 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 12/15/21 at 1:23 pm to Penrod
quote:
war games every year in anticipation of certain war scenarios
Sometimes even during the "events"...
Posted on 12/15/21 at 2:59 pm to Ricardo
quote:
I don’t know why people aren’t demanding answers for that. It’s the elephant in the room that no one seems to acknowledge.
You mean other than what epidemiologists have been able to document about how respiratory viruses can compete with each other resulting in one virus suppressing the other?
I recall the above information being shared early in the pandemic prior to the 2020 flu season. Can it hold true 2 years in a row?
Posted on 12/16/21 at 3:12 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
Yes it is. I am shocked this is the first time I have ever heard of him. Clear, concise, to the point. He knows his stuff.
Listened to the interview three times this week.
Posted on 12/16/21 at 5:29 pm to musick
Listened to it this morning. Not a fan of the interview style podcasts, so JRE isn’t part of my regular rotation, so thank you for sharing.
Shared it with as many people as I thought would listen, needs to be heard.
Does anyone have a link on the person putting the CDC on the spot about showing a case of getting reinfected? It sounded like they folded and couldn’t provide one, I was hoping to read more about that.
Shared it with as many people as I thought would listen, needs to be heard.
Does anyone have a link on the person putting the CDC on the spot about showing a case of getting reinfected? It sounded like they folded and couldn’t provide one, I was hoping to read more about that.
Posted on 12/16/21 at 6:08 pm to LSU Delirium
Posted on 12/16/21 at 6:18 pm to LSU Delirium
quote:
In September a New York attorney, Elizabeth Brehm, had requested “documents reflecting any documented case of an individual who: (1) never received a COVID-19 vaccine; (2) was infected with COVID-19 once, recovered, and then later became infected again; and (3) transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to another person when reinfected.”
Damn, was hoping this was useful. That #3 kinda makes the whole article irrelevant to what we are talking about.
Have they been asked about just straight reinfection? why add that last qualifier, the podcast really made me raise my eyebrows, but that one no reinfection claim is curious. Would seem like it'd be easy to prove right or wrong; and it's a pretty radical claim.
This post was edited on 12/16/21 at 6:23 pm
Posted on 12/16/21 at 6:23 pm to musick
I'm about 17 minutes into the interview on Spotify and it's pretty wild, if true.
Posted on 12/16/21 at 11:02 pm to Pendulum
Yeah, so he makes really interesting points about the refusal to combine pre-hospitalization treatments and to track effectiveness of it.. BUT
He also makes two really bold claims:
1. That nobody has gotten COVID twice.
2. That no asymptomatic people spread COVID
Those two claims raises red flags. He mentions these tests that would be required to prove it and it's a battery of tests that basically nobody does.
He also makes two really bold claims:
1. That nobody has gotten COVID twice.
2. That no asymptomatic people spread COVID
Those two claims raises red flags. He mentions these tests that would be required to prove it and it's a battery of tests that basically nobody does.
Posted on 12/16/21 at 11:07 pm to MJQuick
quote:
This guy is a quack.
If you don’t want to have a factual debate then post your resume and we can see who is more of a quack if that is your measure of validity.
Posted on 12/17/21 at 6:01 am to WaWaWeeWa
While I believe the vaccine push is all about money because common sense tells you this I do struggle with one factor:
If they created a vaccine that they wanted everyone to take to make money from a virus that was created in a lab by them, why not make the vaccine work really well?
If they created a vaccine that they wanted everyone to take to make money from a virus that was created in a lab by them, why not make the vaccine work really well?
Posted on 12/17/21 at 6:42 am to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
The tests aren’t that great. They can’t distinguish between other coronaviruses’ . That’s why flu numbers went to almost zero
Well, the flu is not a coronavirus, it is an influenza virus.
Posted on 12/17/21 at 9:03 am to BeepNode
I have found nothing that refutes him.
Big high point: HZQ and Ivermectin DO work.
Big high point: HZQ and Ivermectin DO work.
Posted on 12/17/21 at 9:13 am to Pendulum
quote:
Have they been asked about just straight reinfection? why add that last qualifier, the podcast really made me raise my eyebrows, but that one no reinfection claim is curious. Would seem like it'd be easy to prove right or wrong; and it's a pretty radical claim.
The theory is no reinfections. The theory is NOT no infection after a false positive. You do remember them intentionally ramping up the false positives by increasing the sensitivity of the test dramatically???
Posted on 12/17/21 at 2:14 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
Yes it is. I am shocked this is the first time I have ever heard of him.
Me too. Where has this guy been the entire time? He is telling it like it is!!
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News