- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dr. Naomi Wolf on War Room, “ Pfizer prepping investors for massive lawsuits”
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:09 am to Bearcat90
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:09 am to Bearcat90
quote:
The sole exception to PREP Act immunity is for death or serious physical injury caused by “willful misconduct.”
It’s right there in the document you linked.
2
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:11 am to teke184
quote:
If people are permanently fricked up and the government goes out of their way to kill liability, the people’s ire switches from Pfizer to the government.
Other than talk radio, Joe Rogan, and Tucker Carlson, NO ONE is going to allow any of this to be told to the public.
They'll try to cancel Tucker and call him a nutjob.
And, the scumbag c*cksuckers KNEW that they would have the Mainstream Media running with their propaganda and that would allow them to get away with it.
This country would be COMPLETELY f*cking different if we had a REAL press with REAL journalist instead of 95% of the media being nothing more than braindead scum working on behalf of the Joseph Goebbels Memorial Propaganda Wing of the DNC.
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:14 am to the808bass
quote:
It’s right there in the document you linked.
Not specifically Bearcat90... They (the vaccine Nazis) don't want to hear it. The jab makes them feel safe despite the lie they live.
This post was edited on 2/10/22 at 10:17 am
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:15 am to loogaroo
The marketing plan for any drug sold in the US includes estimates for litigation.
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:16 am to the808bass
quote:
quote:
The sole exception to PREP Act immunity is for death or serious physical injury caused by “willful misconduct.”
It’s right there in the document you linked.
So is this:
"Second, PREP Act immunity reaches “all claims for loss” under federal and state law. Loss is broadly
defined to mean “any type of loss,” including (i) death; (ii) physical, mental, or emotional injury, illness,
disability, or condition; (iii) fear of such injury, including medical monitoring costs; and (iv) loss of or
damage to property, including business interruption loss. This language seemingly includes, at a
minimum, most state law tort, medical malpractice, and wrongful death claims arising from the
administration of covered countermeasures."
And this:
"If a claim is within the PREP Act’s scope, a covered person is generally immune from legal liability. The
“sole exception” to immunity is when a covered person proximately causes death or serious physical
injury to another person through willful misconduct. A serious physical injury must be life threatening,
permanently impair a body function, permanently damage a body structure, or require medical
intervention to avoid such permanent impairment or damage. Willful misconduct requires that the covered
person acted (i) intentionally to achieve a wrongful purpose; (ii) knowingly without legal or factual
justification; and (iii) in disregard of a known or obvious risk that is so great as to make it highly probable
that the harm will outweigh the benefit."
I'm not arguing for the government, just stating the case. The legal basis will say that the deaths from the jab were outweighed by "that the harm will outweigh the benefit"
And again, I think it's insidious the government did this. But I'll stand firm that Pfizer will never lose any lawsuits.
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:18 am to BigMob
quote:
Let me ask this. Would that liability still stand if it could be proven they acted outside of good faith, i.e. knowingly marketed a product they knew would cause damage? Kind of like how there’s a narrow window - malicious prosecution - where judicial immunity no longer applies? Basically, is there a line that can be crossed to nullify the law you’re referencing ?
Yes. But the Federal Government would have to go after Pfizer first.
quote:
In addition to these procedural and substantive limitations, the PREP Act contains two statutory defenses to claims of willful misconduct.
First, program planners and qualified persons cannot be found to have engaged in willful misconduct if they “acted consistent with applicable directions, guidelines, or recommendations by the Secretary regarding the administration or use of a covered countermeasure,” and notify either the Secretary or a state or local health authority of the injury or death allegedly caused by the countermeasure within seven days.
Second, countermeasure manufacturers and distributors may rely on regulatory compliance as a complete defense to a willful misconduct allegation.
When the act or omission alleged to be willful misconduct is “subject to regulation” under the Public Health Service Act or the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (e.g., by FDA), an injured person cannot succeed on a willful misconduct claim unless the Secretary or the Attorney General has brought certain enforcement actions against the manufacturer or distributor that result in the imposition of particular penalties.
This post was edited on 2/10/22 at 10:19 am
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:19 am to Bearcat90
quote:
But I'll stand firm that Pfizer will never lose any lawsuits.
Right. I would tend to agree with you.
But it’s not that they can’t be sued. It’s that John Doe isn’t likely to win. That’s very different than your first statement.
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:22 am to loogaroo
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:22 am to the808bass
quote:
quote:
But I'll stand firm that Pfizer will never lose any lawsuits.
Right. I would tend to agree with you.
But it’s not that they can’t be sued. It’s that John Doe isn’t likely to win. That’s very different than your first statement.
Yep, you're correct. I didn't even realize I'd stated it that way.
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:24 am to zatetic
Long COVID really just HIV?
>
>
>
> > > 
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:24 am to Bearcat90
All good.
Without the DOJ taking action (hard to conceive a scenario in which they would), Pfizer has defrauded its way to billions in ill-gotten gain.
Without the DOJ taking action (hard to conceive a scenario in which they would), Pfizer has defrauded its way to billions in ill-gotten gain.
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:25 am to zatetic
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:47 am to loogaroo
Pfizer's done for. Bad guys lose. Good guys win
Oh wait, their net income was up 450% last quarter. Either way, I thought the Pfizer's Demise arc was a great addition to the ever-expanding War Room larp universe
Oh wait, their net income was up 450% last quarter. Either way, I thought the Pfizer's Demise arc was a great addition to the ever-expanding War Room larp universe
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:49 am to Pecker
Pecker loves some corporatocracy.
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:49 am to loogaroo
quote:
She said the document Pfizer tried to hide for 75 years contains evidence of the danger of the vaccines.
75 years? Wut?
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:50 am to Bearcat90
quote:
As per the Federal PREP Act, you cannot sue any vaccine manufacturers.
Bless your heart. Lawyers are good at finding loopholes, in case you haven’t noticed. $$$$ talks
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:54 am to the808bass
quote:
Yes. But the Federal Government would have to go after Pfizer first.
And right now the government is running cover for Pfizer, right? It's the FDA that wanted 75 years to release the Pfizer data.
LINK
quote:
In response to a Freedom of Information Act request, the Food and Drug Administration asked a federal judge for permission to make the public wait until the year 2096 to disclose all of the data it relied upon to license Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine.
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:56 am to concrete_tiger
What about all the doctors that assured their patients that the vaccines were safe.
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:59 am to loogaroo
I had an OP last evening inviting the PT faithful to predict when the first class action lawsuits will be filed for Covid19 vaccine injuries. Did you make a prediction?
I’m predicting if America First patriots take power in the House the first class action lawsuits will happen sometime in 2023….probably before the fall of 2023…hopefully sooner.
I’m predicting if America First patriots take power in the House the first class action lawsuits will happen sometime in 2023….probably before the fall of 2023…hopefully sooner.
Posted on 2/10/22 at 11:05 am to SDVTiger
quote:
But Dr Klarvin and Dr Lsupride87 said as well
Klarvin said the MRNA spike protein is not detectable in the human body just a week or two after the vaccine. Dr McCullough has cited autopsy reports of people who were in the first wave of Covid19 vaccinations and have since died that showed the MRNA spike protein was detectable in the brain tissue months after they were vaccinated.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News