- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DOJ Again Refuses to Give Judge Boasberg Sensitive Information on National Security
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:03 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That is aggressive in the worst, authoritarian way
I would care if they were citizens.
0
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
My hang up
But you don’t really have any hang ups. You work from “Orange Man Bad” backwards. Your disagreement with Trump on everything is predetermined.
This is why you aren’t taken seriously, the board already knows you’re disingenuous. And to cut you off before you say it, yea sure plenty of people did the same thing with Biden/Obama
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:03 am to Epic Cajun
The thing is, it doesn't matter because the president is vested with the authority to proclaim a predatory incursion which was done. The "terrorism" argument championed by some is a red herring.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't believe
quote:
I think
quote:
I don't think
quote:
I don't think
Opinions are like assholes...
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:06 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
Why would this lower level judge feel entitled to sensitive national security information?
He doesn't. He's just trying to make an issue of it. He is not entitled to it.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:09 am to Epic Cajun
SFP's emotions on the matter are moot.
quote:
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration is formally designating eight Latin American crime organizations as “foreign terrorist organizations,” upping its pressure on cartels operating in the U.S. and on anyone aiding them.
The move, carrying out a Jan. 20 executive order by President Donald Trump, names Tren de Aragua in Venezuela, MS-13 in El Salvador and six groups based in Mexico. The designation will be published in Thursday’s edition of the Federal Register, according to a notice Wednesday.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I was openly against it. Your point?
That has no logical connection to this situation
Doubtful. Even if you were, you have spent more time opining about this court case than you ever complained about Biden letting in illegals.
The connection is obvious. Biden acted in an authoritarian way when flying in illegals.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:10 am to DeathValley85
His brain disease is that he will ALWAYS thoughtlessly assume nefarious intent or illegality from the Trump administration regardless of merit and legal substance, but when a lefty judge with questionable conflicts takes curiously broad legal latitude to tie up a national security directive in court, he immediately assumes legitimacy. Then gets butt-hurt when others others do the same thing he's doing just for the other side.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:11 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Judge is now giving DOJ another 24 hours to answer these questions or invoke the state secrets doctrine and provide the basis of invocation.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:11 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
Why would this lower level judge feel entitled to sensitive national security information?
Homeboy is operating on survival mode. Boasberg is essential to the goings-on of the Hussein DOJ spying on Trump's campaign and well into his first term.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:12 am to Tigergreg
What you will see, as this thing unfolds, is a very clear and intentional strategy to drag this out as long as possible before his "ruling" gets punted into the next galaxy by higher courts.
That was the plan all along.
That was the plan all along.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:13 am to Vacherie Saint
And when Boasberg's influence is neutralized, there's another federal judge waiting in the wings to become the next obstructionist, kicking the lawfare into a higher gear.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:13 am to Decatur
quote:Link or fresh from MSNBC/CNN celebrating?
Judge is now giving DOJ another 24 hours to answer these questions or invoke the state secrets doctrine and provide the basis of invocation.
Put down the mimosa and link us up.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:15 am to cajunangelle
In his egotistical mind, if he disagrees with those designations, than the judge's rulings have a legal leg to stand on. And his opinions are more important that the directives of the WH and the State Dept.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:17 am to cajunangelle
MSNBC will take a short break from convulsing over Trump having classified docs at MAL and Elon seeing treasury data, to demand that this judge get to see everything he wants.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:17 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:19 am to cajunangelle
quote:
SFP's emotions on the matter are moot.
This is why I asked earlier if TDA appealed their FTO designation within their 30 day window. I haven’t seen that.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:20 am to KCT
quote:
Can they indict and arrest a Supreme Court Justice? Looks to me like Roberts is about to be officially exposed.
And they can round up ACB, too. Something has corrupted her, too.
My guess is that the FBI/DOJ are actively looking into Roberts and hopefully find enough to at least prompt his resignation.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:21 am to LChama
quote:
Mandatory recusal based on evidence of past violations by this judge.
past violations of what?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:21 am to GamecockUltimate
"Which matters because the 14th amendment gives all persons right to due process"
Does it really? When you know you are here illegally, and have been given the opportunity to leave, despite the fact that you were rounded up for committing a crime, do you have rights? Does the Constitution grant citizenship and indemnity to everyone, or to the citizens (lawfully) of the US?
Some of you people need to visit some other countries and see how they would treat people who openly invade their borders and defy authority. Other than a few of the European countries which are rapidly circling the drain, they would boot your azz out quicker than a jackrabbit on a date.
Does it really? When you know you are here illegally, and have been given the opportunity to leave, despite the fact that you were rounded up for committing a crime, do you have rights? Does the Constitution grant citizenship and indemnity to everyone, or to the citizens (lawfully) of the US?
Some of you people need to visit some other countries and see how they would treat people who openly invade their borders and defy authority. Other than a few of the European countries which are rapidly circling the drain, they would boot your azz out quicker than a jackrabbit on a date.
Page 4 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News